For a certain region, the table shows the average number of store employees in 2016 by type of store. Based...
GMAT Problem-Solving and Data Analysis : (PS_DA) Questions
For a certain region, the table shows the average number of store employees in 2016 by type of store. Based on the table, how much greater was the average number of store employees in warehouse stores than in supermarkets?
| Type of store | Average number of employees |
|---|---|
| Warehouse store | 365 |
| Department store | 213 |
| Supermarket | 130 |
83
152
235
495
1. TRANSLATE the problem information
- Given information:
- Table showing average employees by store type
- Warehouse stores: 365 employees
- Department stores: 213 employees
- Supermarkets: 130 employees
- What we need: How much greater warehouse stores than supermarkets
2. TRANSLATE the question language
- "How much greater A than B" means: \(\mathrm{A - B}\)
- So we need: Warehouse stores - Supermarkets
- This gives us: \(\mathrm{365 - 130}\)
3. Calculate the difference
\(\mathrm{365 - 130 = 235}\)
Answer: C. 235
Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem
Most Common Error Path:
Weak TRANSLATE skill: Students misinterpret "how much greater" and think it means addition rather than subtraction.
Instead of finding the difference between warehouse stores and supermarkets, they add the values together: \(\mathrm{365 + 130 = 495}\). This may lead them to select Choice D (495).
Second Most Common Error:
Poor TRANSLATE reasoning: Students correctly understand they need subtraction, but they misread the table or mix up which store types to compare.
They might compare department stores to supermarkets (\(\mathrm{213 - 130 = 83}\)) or warehouse stores to department stores (\(\mathrm{365 - 213 = 152}\)). This may lead them to select Choice A (83) or Choice B (152).
The Bottom Line:
This problem tests whether students can accurately translate comparison language into mathematical operations and carefully read data from tables. The arithmetic is simple, but the language interpretation is crucial.
83
152
235
495