A new car is purchased for $25,000. The value of the car depreciates by 20% at the end of each...
GMAT Advanced Math : (Adv_Math) Questions
A new car is purchased for \(\$25,000\). The value of the car depreciates by \(20\%\) at the end of each year. What is the value of the car, in dollars, at the end of the third year?
$10,000
$12,800
$15,000
$16,000
$20,000
1. TRANSLATE the problem information
- Given information:
- Initial car value: $25,000
- Car depreciates by 20% each year
- Need value after 3 years
- TRANSLATE the key phrase: "depreciates by 20%" means the car retains \(\mathrm{100\% - 20\% = 80\%}\) of its value each year
2. INFER the mathematical pattern
- This creates a repeated multiplication situation
- Each year: \(\mathrm{New\ value = Previous\ value \times 0.8}\)
- We can either calculate year-by-year or use the pattern \(\mathrm{Value = Initial \times (0.8)^n}\)
3. SIMPLIFY using year-by-year calculation
- End of Year 1: \(\mathrm{\$25,000 \times 0.8 = \$20,000}\)
- End of Year 2: \(\mathrm{\$20,000 \times 0.8 = \$16,000}\)
- End of Year 3: \(\mathrm{\$16,000 \times 0.8 = \$12,800}\)
OR using the exponential pattern:
- Value after 3 years = \(\mathrm{\$25,000 \times (0.8)^3}\)
- Calculate \(\mathrm{(0.8)^3 = 0.512}\) (use calculator)
- \(\mathrm{\$25,000 \times 0.512 = \$12,800}\) (use calculator)
Answer: B) $12,800
Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem
Most Common Error Path:
Weak TRANSLATE skill: Students misinterpret "depreciates by 20%" as meaning the car is worth 20% of its original value each year, rather than losing 20% each year.
This leads them to calculate: \(\mathrm{\$25,000 \times 0.2 = \$5,000}\) per year, thinking the car loses $5,000 annually for a final value of \(\mathrm{\$25,000 - 3(\$5,000) = \$10,000}\).
This may lead them to select Choice A ($10,000).
Second Most Common Error:
Poor INFER reasoning: Students correctly understand the 80% retention but apply it incorrectly by calculating \(\mathrm{\$25,000 \times 0.8 \times 3 = \$60,000}\), treating it as simple multiplication rather than repeated multiplication.
This leads to confusion since $60,000 exceeds the original value, causing them to get stuck and guess.
The Bottom Line:
The key challenge is correctly translating percentage depreciation into mathematical operations and recognizing that each year's calculation builds on the previous year's result, not the original value.
$10,000
$12,800
$15,000
$16,000
$20,000