A father is currently three times as old as his son. In 6 years, the father will be twice as...
GMAT Algebra : (Alg) Questions
A father is currently three times as old as his son. In 6 years, the father will be twice as old as his son will be then. What is the father's current age?
6
12
18
24
1. TRANSLATE the problem information
- Given information:
- Father is currently 3 times as old as son
- In 6 years, father will be 2 times as old as son will be then
- Need to find father's current age
- What this tells us: We have two different time periods (now and 6 years from now) with different age relationships
2. INFER the approach
- This problem involves relationships at two different times, so we need a system of equations
- Let \(\mathrm{s}\) = son's current age and \(\mathrm{f}\) = father's current age
- We'll set up one equation for each time period, then solve
3. TRANSLATE each relationship into equations
- Current relationship: \(\mathrm{f = 3s}\)
- Future relationship (6 years from now): \(\mathrm{f + 6 = 2(s + 6)}\)
- Father's age in 6 years = \(\mathrm{f + 6}\)
- Son's age in 6 years = \(\mathrm{s + 6}\)
- Father will be twice the son's age then
4. SIMPLIFY by substituting and solving
- Substitute \(\mathrm{f = 3s}\) into the second equation:
\(\mathrm{3s + 6 = 2(s + 6)}\) - Expand:
\(\mathrm{3s + 6 = 2s + 12}\) - Collect like terms:
\(\mathrm{3s - 2s = 12 - 6}\) - Solve:
\(\mathrm{s = 6}\)
5. Find father's current age
- Since \(\mathrm{f = 3s}\) and \(\mathrm{s = 6}\):
\(\mathrm{f = 3(6) = 18}\)
Answer: C. 18
Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem
Most Common Error Path:
Weak TRANSLATE skill: Students often struggle to correctly set up the future age relationship equation. They might write \(\mathrm{f + 6 = 2s}\) instead of \(\mathrm{f + 6 = 2(s + 6)}\), forgetting that the son will also be 6 years older.
This incorrect equation leads to:
\(\mathrm{3s + 6 = 2s}\) → \(\mathrm{s = -6}\) (impossible age)
This creates confusion and typically leads to guessing among the answer choices.
Second Most Common Error:
Poor INFER reasoning: Students might try to solve this with just one equation, not recognizing that they need both the current and future relationships to create a solvable system.
They might only use \(\mathrm{f = 3s}\) and get stuck because they have two unknowns but only one equation. This leads to abandoning systematic solution and guessing.
The Bottom Line:
Age relationship problems require careful attention to time periods. The key insight is recognizing that "in 6 years" affects BOTH people's ages, not just one person's age. Students must translate each time period separately and then connect them through the same variables.
6
12
18
24