prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

There were approximately 113,000 occupational therapy jobs in the United States in 2012. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has projected...

GMAT Problem-Solving and Data Analysis : (PS_DA) Questions

Source: Official
Problem-Solving and Data Analysis
Percentages
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

There were approximately \(\mathrm{113,000}\) occupational therapy jobs in the United States in \(\mathrm{2012}\). The Bureau of Labor Statistics has projected that this number will increase by \(\mathrm{29\%}\) from \(\mathrm{2012}\) to \(\mathrm{2022}\). Of the following, which is closest to the number of occupational therapy jobs the bureau has projected for the United States in \(\mathrm{2022}\)?

A

115,900

B

116,300

C

142,000

D

145,800

Solution

1. TRANSLATE the problem information

  • Given information:
    • 2012 jobs: \(113,000\)
    • Projected increase: \(29\%\) from 2012 to 2022
    • Need to find: Total jobs in 2022
  • What this tells us: We need to calculate what \(113,000\) becomes after a \(29\%\) increase

2. TRANSLATE the percentage increase concept

  • "Increase by \(29\%\)" means the new amount = original amount + \(29\%\) of original amount
  • This can be calculated as:
    \(\mathrm{New\ amount = Original \times (1 + 0.29)}\)
    \(\mathrm{New\ amount = Original \times 1.29}\)
  • So we need: \(113,000 \times 1.29\)

3. SIMPLIFY the calculation

  • \(113,000 \times 1.29 = 145,770\) (use calculator)
  • Looking at answer choices, \(145,770\) is closest to \(145,800\)

Answer: D. 145,800




Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem

Most Common Error Path:

Weak TRANSLATE skill: Misunderstanding what "increase by \(29\%\)" means

Students often think "increase by \(29\%\)" means "add 29" or "add 2,900" instead of adding \(29\%\) of the original amount. They might calculate:

  • \(113,000 + 29 = 113,029\) (way too small)
  • \(113,000 + 2,900 = 115,900\)

This may lead them to select Choice A (115,900)


Second Most Common Error:

Poor TRANSLATE reasoning: Confusing \(29\%\) with \(2.9\%\)

Students might convert \(29\%\) incorrectly as \(2.9\%\) and calculate:
\(113,000 \times 1.029 = 116,277\)

This may lead them to select Choice B (116,300)


The Bottom Line:

The key challenge is correctly interpreting "increase by \(29\%\)" as multiplying by \(1.29\), not just adding some version of 29 to the original number.

Answer Choices Explained
A

115,900

B

116,300

C

142,000

D

145,800

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.