A rectangular garden has a perimeter of 28 feet. If the length of the garden is x feet, where 0...
GMAT Advanced Math : (Adv_Math) Questions
A rectangular garden has a perimeter of 28 feet. If the length of the garden is \(\mathrm{x}\) feet, where \(\mathrm{0 < x < 14}\), the area \(\mathrm{A}\) of the garden is given by \(\mathrm{A = x(14 - x)}\). For what value of \(\mathrm{x}\) is the area of the garden maximized?
Express your answer as an integer.
1. INFER the mathematical approach
- Given information:
- Rectangular garden with perimeter 28 feet
- Length = \(\mathrm{x}\) feet (where \(\mathrm{0 < x < 14}\))
- Area function: \(\mathrm{A = x(14 - x)}\)
- Key insight: To maximize area, we need to find the maximum value of this quadratic function
2. SIMPLIFY to standard quadratic form
- Expand \(\mathrm{A = x(14 - x)}\):
\(\mathrm{A = 14x - x^2 = -x^2 + 14x}\) - This gives us standard form with:
- \(\mathrm{a = -1, b = 14, c = 0}\)
3. INFER the optimization strategy
- Since \(\mathrm{a = -1 < 0}\), the parabola opens downward
- Maximum occurs at the vertex
- Use vertex formula: \(\mathrm{x = -b/(2a)}\)
4. SIMPLIFY using the vertex formula
- \(\mathrm{x = -b/(2a)}\)
\(\mathrm{x = -14/(2(-1))}\)
\(\mathrm{x = -14/(-2)}\)
\(\mathrm{x = 7}\)
5. APPLY CONSTRAINTS to verify the solution
- Check domain: \(\mathrm{0 < 7 < 14}\) ✓
- The solution is valid
Answer: 7
Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem
Most Common Error Path:
Weak SIMPLIFY execution: Students make sign errors when applying the vertex formula, particularly with the negative coefficients.
They might calculate \(\mathrm{x = -14/(2(-1))}\) incorrectly as \(\mathrm{x = -14/2 = -7}\), forgetting to properly handle the double negative. Since \(\mathrm{-7}\) is outside the given domain (\(\mathrm{0 < x < 14}\)), this creates confusion about whether their approach is wrong or if they should use the absolute value, leading them to guess or select an incorrect answer.
Second Most Common Error:
Poor INFER reasoning: Students don't recognize this as a vertex-finding problem and instead try to solve by setting the derivative equal to zero or by trial-and-error testing values.
Without the systematic vertex approach, they may test a few values like \(\mathrm{x = 5}\), \(\mathrm{x = 10}\), etc., and pick whichever gives a larger area without finding the true maximum. This leads to selecting a reasonable but incorrect value.
The Bottom Line:
Success requires recognizing the optimization nature of the problem and systematically applying the vertex formula with careful attention to sign handling.