A wire that is 4{,650} millimeters long is to be cut into as many 120-millimeter pieces as possible. Each cut...
GMAT Algebra : (Alg) Questions
A wire that is \(\mathrm{4{,}650}\) millimeters long is to be cut into as many \(\mathrm{120}\)-millimeter pieces as possible. Each cut wastes an additional \(\mathrm{15}\) millimeters of wire due to the cutting process. What is the maximum number of \(\mathrm{120}\)-millimeter pieces that can be obtained from the wire?
34
35
38
39
1. TRANSLATE the problem information
- Given information:
- Total wire length: 4,650 mm
- Desired piece length: 120 mm each
- Waste per cut: 15 mm
- Find: Maximum number of pieces possible
2. INFER the cutting relationship
- Key insight: To get k pieces from one wire, you need exactly (k-1) cuts
- Think about it: 1 cut → 2 pieces, 2 cuts → 3 pieces, etc.
- Total wire consumed = (pieces × length) + (cuts × waste per cut)
- Total wire consumed = \(120\mathrm{k} + 15(\mathrm{k}-1)\)
3. TRANSLATE the constraint
- The wire consumed cannot exceed what we have:
\(120\mathrm{k} + 15(\mathrm{k}-1) \leq 4,650\)
4. SIMPLIFY the inequality
- Expand: \(120\mathrm{k} + 15\mathrm{k} - 15 \leq 4,650\)
- Combine: \(135\mathrm{k} - 15 \leq 4,650\)
- Add 15: \(135\mathrm{k} \leq 4,665\)
- Divide by 135: \(\mathrm{k} \leq 34.555...\) (use calculator)
5. APPLY CONSTRAINTS to find the answer
- Since we can't cut a fractional piece, k must be a whole number
- Maximum whole number ≤ 34.555 is \(\mathrm{k} = 34\)
6. Verify the answer
- For \(\mathrm{k} = 34\): \(120(34) + 15(33) = 4,575 \leq 4,650\) ✓
- For \(\mathrm{k} = 35\): \(120(35) + 15(34) = 4,710 \gt 4,650\) ✗
Answer: A. 34
Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem
Most Common Error Path:
Weak INFER skill: Students often assume you need k cuts to get k pieces, leading to the equation \(120\mathrm{k} + 15\mathrm{k} \leq 4,650\). This gives \(135\mathrm{k} \leq 4,650\), so \(\mathrm{k} \leq 34.44\), leading them to conclude \(\mathrm{k} = 34\). While this happens to give the right answer, it's based on incorrect reasoning about the cutting process.
Second Most Common Error:
Poor TRANSLATE reasoning: Students might ignore the waste entirely and simply divide \(4,650 \div 120 = 38.75\), concluding they can get 38 pieces. This may lead them to select Choice C (38).
The Bottom Line:
This problem requires careful attention to the relationship between cuts and pieces. The cutting waste creates a constraint that's more complex than simple division, and students must translate the physical cutting process accurately into mathematics.
34
35
38
39