prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

A wire that is 4{,650} millimeters long is to be cut into as many 120-millimeter pieces as possible. Each cut...

GMAT Algebra : (Alg) Questions

Source: Prism
Algebra
Linear inequalities in 1 or 2 variables
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

A wire that is \(\mathrm{4{,}650}\) millimeters long is to be cut into as many \(\mathrm{120}\)-millimeter pieces as possible. Each cut wastes an additional \(\mathrm{15}\) millimeters of wire due to the cutting process. What is the maximum number of \(\mathrm{120}\)-millimeter pieces that can be obtained from the wire?

A

34

B

35

C

38

D

39

Solution

1. TRANSLATE the problem information

  • Given information:
    • Total wire length: 4,650 mm
    • Desired piece length: 120 mm each
    • Waste per cut: 15 mm
    • Find: Maximum number of pieces possible

2. INFER the cutting relationship

  • Key insight: To get k pieces from one wire, you need exactly (k-1) cuts
  • Think about it: 1 cut → 2 pieces, 2 cuts → 3 pieces, etc.
  • Total wire consumed = (pieces × length) + (cuts × waste per cut)
  • Total wire consumed = \(120\mathrm{k} + 15(\mathrm{k}-1)\)

3. TRANSLATE the constraint

  • The wire consumed cannot exceed what we have:
    \(120\mathrm{k} + 15(\mathrm{k}-1) \leq 4,650\)

4. SIMPLIFY the inequality

  • Expand: \(120\mathrm{k} + 15\mathrm{k} - 15 \leq 4,650\)
  • Combine: \(135\mathrm{k} - 15 \leq 4,650\)
  • Add 15: \(135\mathrm{k} \leq 4,665\)
  • Divide by 135: \(\mathrm{k} \leq 34.555...\) (use calculator)

5. APPLY CONSTRAINTS to find the answer

  • Since we can't cut a fractional piece, k must be a whole number
  • Maximum whole number ≤ 34.555 is \(\mathrm{k} = 34\)

6. Verify the answer

  • For \(\mathrm{k} = 34\): \(120(34) + 15(33) = 4,575 \leq 4,650\)
  • For \(\mathrm{k} = 35\): \(120(35) + 15(34) = 4,710 \gt 4,650\)

Answer: A. 34




Why Students Usually Falter on This Problem

Most Common Error Path:

Weak INFER skill: Students often assume you need k cuts to get k pieces, leading to the equation \(120\mathrm{k} + 15\mathrm{k} \leq 4,650\). This gives \(135\mathrm{k} \leq 4,650\), so \(\mathrm{k} \leq 34.44\), leading them to conclude \(\mathrm{k} = 34\). While this happens to give the right answer, it's based on incorrect reasoning about the cutting process.

Second Most Common Error:

Poor TRANSLATE reasoning: Students might ignore the waste entirely and simply divide \(4,650 \div 120 = 38.75\), concluding they can get 38 pieces. This may lead them to select Choice C (38).

The Bottom Line:

This problem requires careful attention to the relationship between cuts and pieces. The cutting waste creates a constraint that's more complex than simple division, and students must translate the physical cutting process accurately into mathematics.

Answer Choices Explained
A

34

B

35

C

38

D

39

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.