A recent study tracked the number of bee species present in twenty-seven New York apple orchards over a ten-year period....
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
A recent study tracked the number of bee species present in twenty-seven New York apple orchards over a ten-year period. ______ found that when wild growth near an orchard was cleared, the number of different bee species visiting the orchard decreased.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Entomologist Heather Grab:
Entomologist, Heather Grab,
Entomologist Heather Grab
Entomologist Heather Grab,
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- A recent study
- tracked the number of bee species
- present in twenty-seven New York apple orchards
- over a ten-year period.
- tracked the number of bee species
- [Entomologist Heather Grab + (?)]
- found
- that when wild growth near an orchard was cleared,
- the number of different bee species visiting the orchard decreased.
- found
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start with the first sentence:
- 'A recent study tracked the number of bee species present in twenty-seven New York apple orchards over a ten-year period.'
- This tells us someone did a long-term study watching how many different types of bees visited apple orchards in New York.
Now the second sentence begins with our blank and tells us who did the study:
- '[Blank] found that...'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- All choices give us: "Entomologist Heather Grab"
- They differ in punctuation - some have colons, some have commas
To see what works here, let's read the complete sentence:
- 'Entomologist Heather Grab [?] found that when wild growth near an orchard was cleared, the number of different bee species visiting the orchard decreased.'
Let's understand what this is telling us:
- An entomologist (a scientist who studies insects) named Heather Grab discovered something through this study
- What she found: when people cleared away wild plants near an orchard, fewer types of bees came to visit
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "Entomologist Heather Grab" is the subject - the person doing the action
- "Entomologist" is the professional title
- "Heather Grab" is the person's name
- Together they form one complete unit: title + name
- "found" is the verb - what she did
- These two parts go directly together:
- Title + name → verb
- Subject → action
When a title directly identifies someone by name and they're the subject performing an action, they form a single, smooth noun phrase. No punctuation should come between them or between the subject and its verb.
So we need: Choice C - "Entomologist Heather Grab" (no punctuation)
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Punctuation with Titles and Names as Subjects
When a professional title or designation directly precedes and identifies a person's name, and together they serve as the subject of the sentence, they form a unified noun phrase that needs no punctuation:
Pattern: Title + Name = Subject → Verb
Example 1:
- Correct: Astronaut Sally Ride became the first American woman in space
- "Astronaut" (title) + "Sally Ride" (name) = complete subject
- No comma needed before the verb "became"
Example 2:
- Correct: Professor James Chen published groundbreaking research
- "Professor" (title) + "James Chen" (name) = complete subject
- No comma before "published"
Example 3 (from our question):
- Correct: Entomologist Heather Grab found that...
- "Entomologist" (title) + "Heather Grab" (name) = complete subject
- No punctuation before "found"
Why this matters:
When the title and name work together to identify who is performing the action, they should flow as one smooth unit directly into the verb. Adding punctuation (commas or colons) would incorrectly break up this natural subject-verb relationship.
Note: This is different from situations where you're providing additional information about someone already mentioned (called an appositive in grammar terms), which would require commas: "The researcher, an entomologist from Cornell, conducted the study."
Entomologist Heather Grab:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce something that follows - like a list, an explanation, or an elaboration
- Here, "found" is simply the verb that goes with the subject "Entomologist Heather Grab"
- A colon would incorrectly separate the subject from its verb and suggest something is being introduced, which isn't the case
Entomologist, Heather Grab,
✗ Incorrect
- The comma after "Entomologist" would incorrectly separate the title from the name
- When a title directly identifies a specific person, they should flow together as one unit
- The comma after "Grab" would also unnecessarily separate the subject from the verb
- This creates awkward, incorrect pauses where the sentence should flow smoothly
Entomologist Heather Grab
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
Entomologist Heather Grab,
✗ Incorrect
- The comma after "Grab" incorrectly separates the subject from its verb
- This is like writing "The scientist, discovered something" - it creates an inappropriate pause
- The subject and verb should connect directly without interruption