Text 1Africa's Sahara region—once a lush ecosystem—began to dry out about 8,000 years ago. A change in Earth's orbit that...
GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions
Africa's Sahara region—once a lush ecosystem—began to dry out about 8,000 years ago. A change in Earth's orbit that affected climate has been posited as a cause of desertification, but archaeologist David Wright also attributes the shift to Neolithic peoples. He cites their adoption of pastoralism as a factor in the region drying out: the pastoralists' livestock depleted vegetation, prompting the events that created the Sahara Desert.
Text 2
Research by Chris Brierley et al. challenges the idea that Neolithic peoples contributed to the Sahara's desertification. Using a climate-vegetation model, the team concluded that the end of the region's humid period occurred 500 years earlier than previously assumed. The timing suggests that Neolithic peoples didn't exacerbate aridity in the region but, in fact, may have helped delay environmental changes with practices (e.g., selective grazing) that preserved vegetation.
Based on the texts, how would Chris Brierley (Text 2) most likely respond to the discussion in Text 1?
By pointing out that given the revised timeline for the end of the Sahara's humid period, the Neolithic peoples' mode of subsistence likely didn't cause the region's desertification
By claiming that pastoralism was only one of many behaviors the Neolithic peoples took part in that may have contributed to the Sahara's changing climate
By insisting that pastoralism can have both beneficial and deleterious effects on a region's vegetation and climate
By asserting that more research needs to be conducted into factors that likely contributed to the desertification of the Sahara region
Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage
Part A: Create Passage Analysis Table
| Text from Passage | Analysis |
|---|---|
| 'Africa's Sahara region—once a lush ecosystem—began to dry out about 8,000 years ago.' |
|
| 'A change in Earth's orbit that affected climate has been posited as a cause of desertification, but archaeologist David Wright also attributes the shift to Neolithic peoples.' |
|
| 'He cites their adoption of pastoralism as a factor in the region drying out: the pastoralists' livestock depleted vegetation, prompting the events that created the Sahara Desert.' |
|
| 'Research by Chris Brierley et al. challenges the idea that Neolithic peoples contributed to the Sahara's desertification.' |
|
| 'Using a climate-vegetation model, the team concluded that the end of the region's humid period occurred 500 years earlier than previously assumed.' |
|
| 'The timing suggests that Neolithic peoples didn't exacerbate aridity in the region but, in fact, may have helped delay environmental changes with practices (e.g., selective grazing) that preserved vegetation.' |
|
Part B: Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements
Visual Structure Map:
[HISTORICAL CONTEXT: Sahara dried 8K years ago]
→ [COMPETING THEORIES]
├── Wright's Theory: Neolithic pastoralism → vegetation loss → desertification
└── Brierley's Challenge: Model shows earlier timeline, Neolithic peoples may have delayed changes
Main Point:
Two researchers disagree about whether Neolithic peoples caused Sahara desertification, with Brierley's timeline research suggesting they didn't cause it and may have actually delayed it.
Argument Flow:
Text 1 presents Wright's theory that Neolithic pastoralism caused desertification through vegetation depletion. Text 2 counters this by showing the humid period ended earlier than previously thought, suggesting Neolithic peoples arrived after the drying began and may have actually helped slow the process.
Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely
What's being asked?
How Brierley would respond to Wright's discussion in Text 1
What type of answer do we need?
Brierley's likely counterargument or rebuttal
Any limiting keywords?
'Based on the texts' - we must stick to what's provided. This is asking us to predict how one researcher would respond to another's claims, based on the contrasting evidence and conclusions presented in the two texts.
Step 3: Prethink the Answer
- Based on our analysis, Brierley's key finding is that the humid period ended 500 years earlier than previously assumed
- This timing is crucial because if the drying started earlier, then Neolithic peoples couldn't have been the cause - they would have arrived after the process was already underway
- Brierley would likely emphasize this timeline mismatch to refute Wright's causation claim
- The right answer should focus on how Brierley's revised timeline undermines Wright's theory about Neolithic peoples causing desertification
- The right answer should emphasize that the earlier timeline rules out Neolithic peoples as the cause of desertification
By pointing out that given the revised timeline for the end of the Sahara's humid period, the Neolithic peoples' mode of subsistence likely didn't cause the region's desertification
- This directly addresses Brierley's key finding - the revised timeline
- Shows how the earlier end date undermines Wright's causation theory
- Matches our prethinking about timeline being the crucial counter-evidence
By claiming that pastoralism was only one of many behaviors the Neolithic peoples took part in that may have contributed to the Sahara's changing climate
- Suggests Brierley agrees pastoralism contributed but was 'only one' factor
- Contradicts Brierley's actual position that Neolithic peoples didn't cause desertification
- What trap this represents: Students might think this sounds moderate and reasonable, but it misses that Brierley completely rejects the causation claim
By insisting that pastoralism can have both beneficial and deleterious effects on a region's vegetation and climate
- While Text 2 mentions beneficial effects, this isn't Brierley's main response to Wright
- Focuses on effects rather than the timing argument that's central to Brierley's challenge
- What trap this represents: Students might be drawn to this because it mentions both beneficial and harmful effects, but it misses the core timeline argument
By asserting that more research needs to be conducted into factors that likely contributed to the desertification of the Sahara region
- Brierley isn't calling for more research - he's presenting definitive findings from his model
- This is too vague and doesn't capture Brierley's specific counter-argument