prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Alice Guy-Blaché directed hundreds of films between 1896 and 1920. She wanted audiences to feel like they were watching real...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Official
Information and Ideas
Inferences
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Alice Guy-Blaché directed hundreds of films between 1896 and 1920. She wanted audiences to feel like they were watching real people on screen. She would encourage actors in her films to behave naturally. Guy-Blaché even hung a large sign reading 'Be Natural' in the studio where she made her films. At the time, films lacked sound, so actors needed to rely solely on their bodies and facial expressions to convey emotions. As a result, actors tended to highly exaggerate their actions and expressions. The style of acting in Guy-Blaché's films was therefore ______

Which choice most logically completes the text?

A
copied by many of Guy-Blaché's peers.
B
familiar to actors who had worked on other directors' films.
C
very unusual for the period.
D
better than film acting today.
Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Alice Guy-Blaché directed hundreds of films between 1896 and 1920."
  • What it says: A.G-B = director, many films, 1896-1920
  • What it does: Introduces the main subject and time period
  • What it is: Background context
"She wanted audiences to feel like they were watching real people on screen."
  • What it says: Goal = realistic viewing experience
  • What it does: Explains her artistic philosophy
  • What it is: Central claim
"She would encourage actors in her films to behave naturally."
  • What it says: Method = natural acting direction
  • What it does: Provides evidence for how she pursued her goal
  • What it is: Supporting evidence
"Guy-Blaché even hung a large sign reading 'Be Natural' in the studio where she made her films."
  • What it says: Physical sign "Be Natural" in studio
  • What it does: Reinforces her commitment to natural acting
  • What it is: Additional evidence
"At the time, films lacked sound, so actors needed to rely solely on their bodies and facial expressions to convey emotions."
  • What it says: Silent films require only body/face for emotion
  • What it does: Introduces the technical constraints of the era
  • What it is: Historical context
"As a result, actors tended to highly exaggerate their actions and expressions."
  • What it says: Constraint result = exaggerated acting
  • What it does: Explains the typical response to silent film limitations
  • What it is: Consequence/norm

Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: Guy-Blaché promoted natural acting in an era where technical constraints typically led to exaggerated performance styles.

Argument Flow: The passage establishes Guy-Blaché's commitment to natural acting, then explains how silent film constraints usually made actors exaggerate, setting up a contrast that leads to the missing conclusion about how her approach differed from the norm.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The passage creates a clear setup: Guy-Blaché pushed for natural acting, but the era's silent film constraints made actors typically exaggerate
  • Since she was actively working against the standard practice of her time, her natural style would stand out as different from what audiences and industry people were used to seeing
  • The answer should capture how her approach contrasted with the exaggerated norm of that period
Answer Choices Explained
A
copied by many of Guy-Blaché's peers.
✗ Incorrect
  • Claims her style was copied by peers
  • The passage gives no information about other directors following her approach
  • Actually contradicts the implication that her style was distinctive
B
familiar to actors who had worked on other directors' films.
✗ Incorrect
  • Suggests her style would be familiar to actors from other films
  • This contradicts the passage's setup - if other films used exaggerated acting, her natural style wouldn't be familiar
C
very unusual for the period.
✓ Correct
  • Captures that her natural style differed significantly from the era's exaggerated norm
  • Flows logically from the contrast: everyone else exaggerated due to silent film constraints, but she promoted natural acting
D
better than film acting today.
✗ Incorrect
  • Makes a comparison to modern film acting that the passage doesn't support
  • Goes beyond the scope of what we can conclude from the given information
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.