prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Ancient Roman engineers constructed concrete buildings and infrastructure that exhibit extraordinary longevity, with numerous structures and water del...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Prism
Information and Ideas
Inferences
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Ancient Roman engineers constructed concrete buildings and infrastructure that exhibit extraordinary longevity, with numerous structures and water delivery systems remaining intact after two thousand years, whereas contemporary concrete construction commonly degrades within several decades. Building professionals historically attributed this enhanced permanence to exclusive limestone deposits available to Roman constructors, yet mineralogical analysis has demonstrated that present-day concrete utilizes limestone extracted from identical geological strata employed in Roman times. Systematic examination of Roman construction locations, nevertheless, has uncovered specialized blending protocols and hardening techniques recorded in historical documents, suggesting that ____________

Which choice most logically completes the text?

A

Roman constructions were presumably not regarded as more enduring than alternative structures from their era.

B

current concrete would attain comparable permanence if alternative limestone deposits were employed.

C

the outstanding longevity of Roman concrete results from expert construction methodologies utilized by historical builders.

D

present-day construction practices duplicate the precise techniques employed by Roman engineers.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Ancient Roman engineers constructed concrete buildings and infrastructure that exhibit extraordinary longevity, with numerous structures and water delivery systems remaining intact after two thousand years,"
  • What it says: Roman concrete = 2000+ yrs intact
  • What it does: Establishes the remarkable durability of Roman construction
  • What it is: Context/background claim
"whereas contemporary concrete construction commonly degrades within several decades."
  • What it says: Modern concrete = degrades in decades
  • What it does: Contrasts Roman durability with modern concrete's short lifespan
  • What it is: Contrasting evidence
"Building professionals historically attributed this enhanced permanence to exclusive limestone deposits available to Roman constructors,"
  • What it says: Experts thought = special limestone caused durability
  • What it does: Presents the traditional explanation for Roman concrete's superiority
  • What it is: Historical claim/theory
"yet mineralogical analysis has demonstrated that present-day concrete utilizes limestone extracted from identical geological strata employed in Roman times."
  • What it says: Analysis shows = same limestone used then & now
  • What it does: Contradicts the limestone theory with scientific evidence
  • What it is: Contradicting evidence
"Systematic examination of Roman construction locations, nevertheless, has uncovered specialized blending protocols and hardening techniques recorded in historical documents,"
  • What it says: Research found = special mixing/hardening methods in old docs
  • What it does: Introduces new evidence about Roman construction methods
  • What it is: New evidence/discovery

Part B: Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: Roman concrete's exceptional durability cannot be explained by different materials, leading researchers to discover that specialized construction techniques may be the real reason.

Argument Flow: The passage moves from establishing Roman concrete's superiority, to debunking the traditional limestone explanation, to presenting new evidence about specialized Roman techniques that points toward a different explanation for their concrete's longevity.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The passage has established: Roman concrete is incredibly durable, we thought it was due to special limestone, but that theory was proven wrong since they used the same limestone we use today
  • However, researchers then discovered specialized construction techniques in historical documents
  • The right answer should connect these newly discovered techniques to explaining Roman concrete's superior durability
Answer Choices Explained
A

Roman constructions were presumably not regarded as more enduring than alternative structures from their era.

✗ Incorrect

Claims Roman constructions weren't seen as more durable - contradicts the entire premise

B

current concrete would attain comparable permanence if alternative limestone deposits were employed.

✗ Incorrect

Suggests using different limestone would help - contradicts the finding that identical limestone is used

C

the outstanding longevity of Roman concrete results from expert construction methodologies utilized by historical builders.

✓ Correct

States that expert construction methodologies explain Roman concrete's longevity - perfectly matches our prethinking and logically follows from the evidence

D

present-day construction practices duplicate the precise techniques employed by Roman engineers.

✗ Incorrect

Claims current practices duplicate Roman techniques - contradicts the premise that modern concrete degrades quickly

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.