Architect James Chen has revolutionized affordable housing design through innovative use of recycled materials. His residential project in Portland su...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Architect James Chen has revolutionized affordable housing design through innovative use of recycled materials. His residential project in Portland successfully reduced construction costs _____ each unit incorporating solar panels and rainwater collection systems that minimize long-term utility expenses.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
with
; with
, with
with,
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Architect James Chen
- has revolutionized affordable housing design
- through innovative use of recycled materials.
- has revolutionized affordable housing design
- His residential project in Portland
- successfully reduced construction costs
- [?] each unit incorporating solar panels and rainwater collection systems
- that minimize long-term utility expenses.
- [?] each unit incorporating solar panels and rainwater collection systems
- successfully reduced construction costs
Understanding the Meaning
The first sentence gives us context:
- Architect James Chen revolutionized affordable housing design
- by using recycled materials in innovative ways
Now let's look at the second sentence:
- "His residential project in Portland successfully reduced construction costs"
- This is a complete statement - the project reduced costs
This is where we have the blank.
Let's look at the choices:
- A: with (no punctuation)
- B: ; with (semicolon before)
- C: , with (comma before)
- D: with, (comma after)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- "with each unit incorporating solar panels and rainwater collection systems that minimize long-term utility expenses"
Now let's understand what this is telling us:
- "with each unit incorporating solar panels and rainwater collection systems..."
- This is giving us additional detail about HOW the project worked
- It's explaining that each unit had these features
- "that minimize long-term utility expenses"
- This further describes the solar panels and rainwater systems
- They help reduce what residents pay for utilities over time
So the complete picture is:
- The project reduced construction costs, and additionally, each unit has features that reduce ongoing utility costs
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "His residential project in Portland successfully reduced construction costs" = a complete thought
- It has a subject ("His residential project") and verb ("reduced")
- It could stand alone as a sentence
- "with each unit incorporating solar panels..." = additional descriptive information
- This is NOT a complete sentence on its own
- It's a phrase that adds extra detail about the project
When we have a complete thought followed by a descriptive phrase that adds information, we need a comma to separate them.
So we need C: , with
- The comma comes before "with" to separate the complete main clause from the additional descriptive phrase
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Commas to Separate Complete Thoughts from Descriptive Phrases
When you have a complete independent clause (a full sentence with subject and verb) followed by a descriptive phrase that adds extra information, use a comma to separate them:
Pattern:
- Complete independent clause + comma + descriptive phrase starting with "with"
Example 1:
- "The museum expanded its collection, with new artworks arriving monthly"
- Complete thought: "The museum expanded its collection"
- Descriptive phrase: "with new artworks arriving monthly"
Example 2:
- "The company launched three new products, with each one targeting a different market"
- Complete thought: "The company launched three new products"
- Descriptive phrase: "with each one targeting a different market"
In our question:
- Complete thought: "His residential project in Portland successfully reduced construction costs"
- Descriptive phrase: "with each unit incorporating solar panels and rainwater collection systems..."
- Solution: Place a comma before "with" to properly separate these two parts
The descriptive phrase starting with "with" (called a prepositional phrase with a participle in grammar terms) cannot stand alone as a sentence. It provides supplementary information about the main statement, so we use a comma to signal this relationship to the reader.
with
✗ Incorrect
- Creates no separation between the complete main clause and the additional descriptive phrase
- Readers need a pause point to signal that new descriptive information is being added
- Without punctuation, the sentence feels rushed and doesn't follow standard conventions
; with
✗ Incorrect
- Semicolons are used to connect two complete independent clauses (two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as sentences)
- "with each unit incorporating solar panels..." cannot stand alone as a sentence
- It's a descriptive phrase that depends on the main clause, not an independent statement
, with
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
with,
✗ Incorrect
- Places the comma in the wrong position
- The comma needs to come BEFORE "with" to separate the main clause from what follows
- Putting it after "with" would incorrectly break up the phrase "with each unit," separating words that belong together