prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

As a behavioral economist, Katy Milkman of the University of Pennsylvania recognizes that people sometimes make irrational economic decisions. Milkman...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Official
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

As a behavioral economist, Katy Milkman of the University of Pennsylvania recognizes that people sometimes make irrational economic decisions. Milkman's research can thus address anomalies that neoclassical economic _______ assume that people are consistently rational decision-makers—cannot explain.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A
models—which
B
models, which
C
models which
D
models which—
Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • As a behavioral economist,
    • Katy Milkman of the University of Pennsylvania
      • recognizes
        • that people sometimes make irrational economic decisions.
  • Milkman's research
    • can thus address anomalies
      • that neoclassical economic models [?] which assume that people
        • are consistently rational decision-makers [?]
          • cannot explain.

Understanding the Meaning

The first sentence sets up the context:

  • 'As a behavioral economist, Katy Milkman of the University of Pennsylvania recognizes that people sometimes make irrational economic decisions.'
    • This tells us Milkman's field and her key insight
    • People don't always make rational economic choices

Now the second sentence tells us the significance of Milkman's research:

  • 'Milkman's research can thus address anomalies'
    • "Thus" = because she understands irrationality
    • She can explain anomalies (things that don't fit the expected pattern)

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • The punctuation varies around the phrase "which assume that people are consistently rational decision-makers"

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

  • 'that neoclassical economic models... cannot explain'
    • This is describing what anomalies we're talking about
    • Anomalies that traditional economic models can't explain

So putting it together, the structure is:

  • 'anomalies that neoclassical economic models [description of the models] cannot explain'

Now let's understand what this middle part is doing:

  • 'which assume that people are consistently rational decision-makers'
    • This describes what neoclassical models assume
    • They assume people are always rational

The complete meaning:

  • Milkman's research can explain problems that traditional economic models (which assume people are always rational) can't explain
  • This makes sense because Milkman recognizes people are sometimes irrational, while traditional models don't account for that

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • The phrase "which assume that people are consistently rational decision-makers" is:
    • Additional information about the models (non-essential - we could remove it and the sentence would still work)
    • Interrupting the flow from "models" to "cannot explain"
  • We have: "models" ... [interrupting information] ... "cannot explain"
    • The subject "models" is separated from its verb "cannot explain"

When you have non-essential information that interrupts between related parts of a sentence, you need matching punctuation on both sides - like putting the interruption in a container.

So we need: matching dashes (or matching commas, but dashes work better for substantial interruptions like this one).

The correct answer is A: models—which ... decision-makers—cannot


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using Matching Punctuation to Set Off Interrupting Information

When you insert descriptive information that:

  • Is non-essential (could be removed without breaking the sentence)
  • Interrupts the flow between related parts (like between a subject and its verb)

You must use matching punctuation on both sides to set it off - either two commas or two dashes:

With dashes (for emphasis or longer interruptions):

  • The research—which took five years to complete—changed the field
  • "research" connects to "changed" (subject and verb)
  • The middle part interrupts with extra information
  • Matching dashes create a clear container

With commas (for simpler, shorter interruptions):

  • The scientist, who worked in Boston, made an important discovery
  • Same principle with commas instead of dashes

In this question:

  • "neoclassical economic models" [subject] needs to connect to "cannot explain" [verb]
  • "which assume that people are consistently rational decision-makers" interrupts with descriptive information
  • Matching dashes properly set off this substantial interruption: models—which assume...—cannot explain
Answer Choices Explained
A
models—which
✓ Correct
  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
B
models, which
✗ Incorrect
  • While commas can set off non-essential clauses, notice the formatting: "decision-makers,cannot" has no space after the comma
  • This is a formatting error that makes the choice incorrect
  • Even if properly formatted, dashes are more effective than commas for substantial interruptions with their own internal clause structure
C
models which
✗ Incorrect
  • Has no punctuation at all
  • This makes the phrase seem like essential information, as if we're distinguishing between some models that assume rationality and others that don't
  • But the meaning requires this to be non-essential descriptive information about all neoclassical models
  • Without punctuation, the sentence runs on and is difficult to parse
D
models which—
✗ Incorrect
  • Places a dash after "which" instead of before it
  • Has no closing punctuation to match and complete the interruption
  • The unmatched punctuation creates confusion about where the interruption begins and ends
  • Doesn't properly mark the opening of the interrupting element
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.