As British scientist Peter Whibberley has observed, 'the Earth is not a very good timekeeper.' Earth's slightly irregular rotation rate...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
As British scientist Peter Whibberley has observed, 'the Earth is not a very good timekeeper.' Earth's slightly irregular rotation rate means that measurements of time must be periodically adjusted. Specifically, an extra 'leap second' (the \(86,401^{\mathrm{st}}\) second of the day) is ________ time based on the planet's rotation lags a full nine-tenths of a second behind time kept by precise atomic clocks.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
added, whenever
added; whenever
added. Whenever
added whenever
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- As British scientist Peter Whibberley has observed,
- 'the Earth is not a very good timekeeper.'
- Earth's slightly irregular rotation rate
- means that measurements of time
- must be periodically adjusted.
- means that measurements of time
- Specifically,
- an extra 'leap second'
- (the 86,401st second of the day)
- is added [?]
- whenever time based on the planet's rotation
- lags a full nine-tenths of a second behind time
- kept by precise atomic clocks.
- lags a full nine-tenths of a second behind time
- an extra 'leap second'
Understanding the Meaning
The passage starts with some background context:
- A scientist observes that Earth isn't a perfect timekeeper
- Earth's rotation isn't perfectly regular
- So we need to adjust our time measurements sometimes
Now we get to the specific example:
- An extra 'leap second' (the 86,401st second of the day) is added [?]
This is where we have the blank.
Let's look at the choices:
- They're asking us whether we need punctuation after "added" – a comma, a semicolon, a period, or nothing at all.
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- "whenever time based on the planet's rotation lags a full nine-tenths of a second behind time kept by precise atomic clocks"
Let's break this down:
- "whenever" tells us WHEN this leap second gets added
- It's added when the time based on Earth's rotation falls behind atomic clock time by nine-tenths of a second
So the complete picture is:
- A leap second is added whenever (at whatever time) the Earth-based time lags behind atomic clock time by 0.9 seconds.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have a complete statement: "an extra leap second is added"
- This could stand alone as a sentence – it has a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought.
- Then we have "whenever time based on the planet's rotation lags..."
- This part starts with "whenever" – a word that introduces a dependent, conditional element
- It's telling us the condition or timing for when the leap second is added
- This part CANNOT stand alone – it needs the main statement to complete its meaning
- The "whenever" clause flows directly from the main statement
- It's providing essential information about when the action happens
- The word "whenever" itself signals this relationship
When a dependent clause like this comes after the main statement and starts with a word like "whenever," we don't need any punctuation between them. The connecting word does the job of showing the relationship.
So we need: no punctuation – the correct answer is D.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Connecting Dependent Clauses That Follow Main Statements
When you have a complete statement followed by a dependent clause (a clause introduced by words like "whenever," "because," "if," "when," "although," "since," etc. – called subordinating conjunctions in grammar terms), you typically don't need punctuation between them:
Pattern:
- Main statement + whenever/because/if/when clause = NO punctuation needed
Examples:
- With "whenever":
- Main statement: "The alarm sounds"
- Dependent clause: "whenever someone opens the door"
- Combined: "The alarm sounds whenever someone opens the door" ✓
- With "because":
- Main statement: "She stayed home"
- Dependent clause: "because she wasn't feeling well"
- Combined: "She stayed home because she wasn't feeling well" ✓
- With "if":
- Main statement: "Call me"
- Dependent clause: "if you need help"
- Combined: "Call me if you need help" ✓
In our question:
- Main statement: "an extra 'leap second' is added"
- Dependent clause: "whenever time based on the planet's rotation lags..."
- Combined correctly: "is added whenever time..."
Important note: The rule is DIFFERENT when the order is reversed. If the dependent clause comes FIRST, you DO need a comma:
- "Whenever time lags behind, a leap second is added" ✓
added, whenever
✗ Incorrect
- A comma before "whenever" creates an unnecessary pause
- When a dependent clause starting with "whenever" follows the main statement, no comma is needed
- The word "whenever" itself signals the connection between the parts
added; whenever
✗ Incorrect
- A semicolon is used to connect two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as sentences
- "Whenever time based on the planet's rotation lags..." is NOT a complete thought – it's a dependent clause that cannot stand alone
- Using a semicolon here is grammatically incorrect
added. Whenever
✗ Incorrect
- A period would split this into two sentences
- But "Whenever time based on the planet's rotation lags a full nine-tenths of a second behind time kept by precise atomic clocks" cannot stand alone as a sentence
- It's a fragment – a dependent clause that needs to be attached to a main statement
- This creates a sentence fragment error
added whenever
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.