As cheesemaking practices spread throughout Europe and Asia during and after the Neolithic, divergent strategies for preserving milk ________ whereas...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
As cheesemaking practices spread throughout Europe and Asia during and after the Neolithic, divergent strategies for preserving milk ________ whereas rennet-coagulated cheesemaking became key to milk preservation in Europe and Southwest Asia, acid-heat coagulation methods became common among nomadic herding populations of the northeastern Eurasian steppe.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
emerged
emerged and
emerged:
emerged,
Sentence Structure
- As cheesemaking practices spread
- throughout Europe and Asia
- during and after the Neolithic,
- divergent strategies for preserving milk emerged [?]
- whereas rennet-coagulated cheesemaking became key to milk preservation
- in Europe and Southwest Asia,
- acid-heat coagulation methods became common
- among nomadic herding populations
- of the northeastern Eurasian steppe.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
'As cheesemaking practices spread throughout Europe and Asia during and after the Neolithic,'
- This sets up the time period and context
- During and after the Neolithic era (when humans were developing agriculture)
- Cheesemaking was spreading across Europe and Asia
Now we get to the main point:
'divergent strategies for preserving milk emerged'
- Different methods or approaches for preserving milk developed
This is where we have the blank.
Let's look at our choices:
- A: emerged (no punctuation)
- B: emerged and
- C: emerged: (colon)
- D: emerged, (comma)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
'whereas rennet-coagulated cheesemaking became key to milk preservation in Europe and Southwest Asia, acid-heat coagulation methods became common among nomadic herding populations of the northeastern Eurasian steppe.'
Now let's understand what this is telling us:
- This part gives us the TWO specific divergent strategies that emerged:
- First strategy: 'rennet-coagulated cheesemaking became key to milk preservation in Europe and Southwest Asia'
- One method used rennet (an enzyme) to make cheese
- This became the main preservation method in Europe and Southwest Asia
- Second strategy: 'acid-heat coagulation methods became common among nomadic herding populations of the northeastern Eurasian steppe'
- A different method using acid and heat
- This was used by nomadic herders in the northeastern Eurasian steppe
- First strategy: 'rennet-coagulated cheesemaking became key to milk preservation in Europe and Southwest Asia'
- The word 'whereas' signals a contrast between these two approaches
So the complete picture is:
- The sentence first states that different strategies emerged
- Then it explains exactly what those different strategies were
What do we notice about the structure here?
- 'Divergent strategies for preserving milk emerged' is a complete thought
- It can stand alone as a sentence
- What comes after the blank provides the specific details explaining what those divergent strategies actually were
- It's not just adding more information
- It's directly answering the implicit question: "What were these divergent strategies?"
When you have a complete thought followed by a specific explanation or elaboration of what you just said, you need a colon.
The correct answer is C: emerged:
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using a Colon to Introduce an Explanation or Elaboration
When you have a complete independent clause (a thought that could stand alone as a sentence), and you want to follow it with specific details, examples, or an explanation that elaborates on what you just said, you use a colon. The colon signals to the reader: "here comes the specific information about what I just mentioned."
The pattern:
- Complete thought: The committee reached a decision
- Add colon + explanation: The committee reached a decision: they would postpone the vote until next month
- "they would postpone..." explains what the decision was
- Complete thought: The scientist made a surprising discovery
- Add colon + specific details: The scientist made a surprising discovery: the bacteria could survive in temperatures exceeding 200 degrees
- What follows the colon specifies what the discovery was
In our sentence:
- Complete thought: "divergent strategies for preserving milk emerged"
- Colon + explanation: : whereas rennet-coagulated cheesemaking became key in Europe and Southwest Asia, acid-heat coagulation became common among nomadic herding populations
- What follows the colon tells us exactly what those divergent strategies were
The colon is perfect here because the part after it directly explains and elaborates on the "divergent strategies" mentioned before it.
emerged
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a run-on sentence by joining independent clause elements without proper punctuation
- Leaves no signal for the reader that an explanation is coming
- Grammatically incorrect
emerged and
✗ Incorrect
- The word "and" suggests simply adding another parallel action
- But what follows isn't structured to work as a coordinate clause
- "And" doesn't capture the crucial relationship that what follows is an explanation of the strategies mentioned
- The "whereas..." structure doesn't flow naturally after "and"
emerged:
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
emerged,
✗ Incorrect
- A comma alone creates a comma splice - you can't properly connect these parts with just a comma
- More importantly, a comma doesn't signal the explanatory relationship
- The colon is specifically needed to show "here's what I mean by divergent strategies"