Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O. Like many of Ay-O's paintings, Butterfly, which portrays a swimmer...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O. Like many of Ay-O's paintings, Butterfly, which portrays a swimmer performing the butterfly stroke, attempts to make use of the entire visual light _______ sporting rainbow-striped goggles, the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
spectrum
spectrum:
spectrum while
spectrum, while
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O.
- Like many of Ay-O's paintings,
- Butterfly,
- which portrays a swimmer performing the butterfly stroke,
- attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum[?]
- sporting rainbow-striped goggles,
- the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water.
Understanding the Meaning
The first sentence gives us background:
- 'Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O.'
- So we're talking about a specific work of art.
Now the second sentence tells us something about this painting:
- 'Like many of Ay-O's paintings,'
- This painting is similar to the artist's other work.
- 'Butterfly, which portrays a swimmer performing the butterfly stroke,'
- Quick note: the painting shows someone swimming the butterfly stroke.
- 'attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum'
- This is the key point - the painting tries to use the full range of colors in the visible spectrum.
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- A: spectrum (nothing)
- B: spectrum: (colon)
- C: spectrum while
- D: spectrum, while
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- 'sporting rainbow-striped goggles, the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water.'
Now let's really understand what this part is telling us:
- 'sporting rainbow-striped goggles'
- describes the swimmer - wearing goggles with rainbow stripes
- 'the rainbow-hued swimmer'
- the swimmer is colored with rainbow colors
- 'splashes through a wavy rainbow of water'
- even the water is depicted as a rainbow
So the complete picture is:
- The painting shows a swimmer who is rainbow-colored, wearing rainbow goggles, splashing through rainbow water.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- Before the blank: 'Butterfly attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum'
- This is a complete thought - it has a subject (Butterfly) and tells us what the painting does.
- After the blank: 'the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water'
- This is also a complete thought - it has a subject (swimmer) and verb (splashes).
But here's the key relationship:
- The second part is showing us exactly HOW the painting uses the visual spectrum
- It's not just telling us it uses the spectrum - it's demonstrating it by describing all the rainbow elements
- Rainbow goggles + rainbow swimmer + rainbow water = using the full spectrum!
When you have one complete thought that explains or illustrates what the previous complete thought said, you need a colon.
So we need spectrum: (Choice B).
The colon introduces the explanation of how the painting achieves its goal of using the entire visual spectrum.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using a Colon to Introduce an Explanation or Illustration
When you have a complete thought followed by another complete thought that explains, illustrates, or provides examples of what you just said, you can use a colon (called an explanatory colon in grammar terms) to connect them:
Pattern:
- First complete thought: Makes a statement or claim
- Colon
- Second complete thought: Explains, illustrates, or provides examples
Example 1:
- Statement: "The storm caused serious damage"
- Colon introducing explanation: "The storm caused serious damage: three houses lost their roofs and the power was out for days."
- The second part shows specifically what "serious damage" means
Example 2:
- Statement: "She had one goal for the summer"
- Colon introducing explanation: "She had one goal for the summer: she would learn to play the guitar."
- The second part reveals what that goal is
In this question:
- Statement: "Butterfly attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum"
- Colon introducing illustration: "sporting rainbow-striped goggles, the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water"
- The second part demonstrates exactly HOW the painting uses the spectrum - by depicting rainbow elements throughout
spectrum
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a run-on sentence by putting two complete thoughts together with no punctuation
- "Butterfly attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum sporting rainbow-striped goggles" reads incorrectly - it sounds like "Butterfly" (the painting itself) is sporting the goggles
- We need punctuation to separate these two complete thoughts
spectrum:
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
spectrum while
✗ Incorrect
- "While" suggests contrast or things happening at the same time
- But the second part isn't contrasting with the first part - it's explaining and illustrating it
- The relationship is explanatory (showing HOW), not contrastive
spectrum, while
✗ Incorrect
- Has the same logical problem as Choice C - "while" doesn't capture the explanatory relationship between these two parts
- "While" is the wrong word to show that the second part is demonstrating what the first part claims