prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O. Like many of Ay-O's paintings, Butterfly, which portrays a swimmer...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O. Like many of Ay-O's paintings, Butterfly, which portrays a swimmer performing the butterfly stroke, attempts to make use of the entire visual light _______ sporting rainbow-striped goggles, the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

spectrum

B

spectrum:

C

spectrum while

D

spectrum, while

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O.
  • Like many of Ay-O's paintings,
  • Butterfly,
    • which portrays a swimmer performing the butterfly stroke,
    • attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum[?]
      • sporting rainbow-striped goggles,
      • the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water.

Understanding the Meaning

The first sentence gives us background:

  • 'Butterfly is a 1988 painting by the Japanese artist Ay-O.'
    • So we're talking about a specific work of art.

Now the second sentence tells us something about this painting:

  • 'Like many of Ay-O's paintings,'
    • This painting is similar to the artist's other work.
  • 'Butterfly, which portrays a swimmer performing the butterfly stroke,'
    • Quick note: the painting shows someone swimming the butterfly stroke.
  • 'attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum'
    • This is the key point - the painting tries to use the full range of colors in the visible spectrum.

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • A: spectrum (nothing)
  • B: spectrum: (colon)
  • C: spectrum while
  • D: spectrum, while

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

The sentence continues:

  • 'sporting rainbow-striped goggles, the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water.'

Now let's really understand what this part is telling us:

  • 'sporting rainbow-striped goggles'
    • describes the swimmer - wearing goggles with rainbow stripes
  • 'the rainbow-hued swimmer'
    • the swimmer is colored with rainbow colors
  • 'splashes through a wavy rainbow of water'
    • even the water is depicted as a rainbow

So the complete picture is:

  • The painting shows a swimmer who is rainbow-colored, wearing rainbow goggles, splashing through rainbow water.

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • Before the blank: 'Butterfly attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum'
    • This is a complete thought - it has a subject (Butterfly) and tells us what the painting does.
  • After the blank: 'the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water'
    • This is also a complete thought - it has a subject (swimmer) and verb (splashes).

But here's the key relationship:

  • The second part is showing us exactly HOW the painting uses the visual spectrum
    • It's not just telling us it uses the spectrum - it's demonstrating it by describing all the rainbow elements
    • Rainbow goggles + rainbow swimmer + rainbow water = using the full spectrum!

When you have one complete thought that explains or illustrates what the previous complete thought said, you need a colon.

So we need spectrum: (Choice B).

The colon introduces the explanation of how the painting achieves its goal of using the entire visual spectrum.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using a Colon to Introduce an Explanation or Illustration

When you have a complete thought followed by another complete thought that explains, illustrates, or provides examples of what you just said, you can use a colon (called an explanatory colon in grammar terms) to connect them:

Pattern:

  • First complete thought: Makes a statement or claim
  • Colon
  • Second complete thought: Explains, illustrates, or provides examples

Example 1:

  • Statement: "The storm caused serious damage"
  • Colon introducing explanation: "The storm caused serious damage: three houses lost their roofs and the power was out for days."
  • The second part shows specifically what "serious damage" means

Example 2:

  • Statement: "She had one goal for the summer"
  • Colon introducing explanation: "She had one goal for the summer: she would learn to play the guitar."
  • The second part reveals what that goal is

In this question:

  • Statement: "Butterfly attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum"
  • Colon introducing illustration: "sporting rainbow-striped goggles, the rainbow-hued swimmer splashes through a wavy rainbow of water"
  • The second part demonstrates exactly HOW the painting uses the spectrum - by depicting rainbow elements throughout
Answer Choices Explained
A

spectrum

✗ Incorrect

  • Creates a run-on sentence by putting two complete thoughts together with no punctuation
  • "Butterfly attempts to make use of the entire visual light spectrum sporting rainbow-striped goggles" reads incorrectly - it sounds like "Butterfly" (the painting itself) is sporting the goggles
  • We need punctuation to separate these two complete thoughts
B

spectrum:

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

C

spectrum while

✗ Incorrect

  • "While" suggests contrast or things happening at the same time
  • But the second part isn't contrasting with the first part - it's explaining and illustrating it
  • The relationship is explanatory (showing HOW), not contrastive
D

spectrum, while

✗ Incorrect

  • Has the same logical problem as Choice C - "while" doesn't capture the explanatory relationship between these two parts
  • "While" is the wrong word to show that the second part is demonstrating what the first part claims
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.