prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Compared to that of alumina glass, ________ silica glass atoms are so far apart that they are unable to re-form...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Compared to that of alumina glass, ________ silica glass atoms are so far apart that they are unable to re-form bonds after being separated.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

silica glass is at a significant disadvantage due to its more dispersed atomic arrangement

B

silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement, resulting in a significant disadvantage

C

a significant disadvantage of silica glass is that its atomic arrangement is more dispersed

D

silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed, resulting in a significant disadvantage

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Compared to that of alumina glass, [?]
  • silica glass atoms are so far apart
  • that they are unable to re-form bonds
  • after being separated.

Understanding the Meaning

  • Let's start reading from the beginning: 'Compared to that of alumina glass,'
  • This opening phrase sets up a comparison:
    • 'That' is standing in for something about alumina glass
    • Most likely referring to alumina glass's atomic arrangement
    • So we're comparing the atomic arrangement of alumina glass to something
  • This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
    • Choice A: "silica glass is at a significant disadvantage..."
    • Choice B: "silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement..."
    • Choice C: "a significant disadvantage of silica glass is..."
    • Choice D: "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed..."
  • To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
  • The sentence continues: 'silica glass atoms are so far apart that they are unable to re-form bonds after being separated.'
    • This is giving us specific information:
    • Silica glass atoms are very far apart from each other
    • They're so far apart that once separated, they can't re-form bonds
    • This is explaining a physical property and its consequence
  • Now, what do we notice about the structure here?
    • The opening phrase "Compared to that of alumina glass" creates a comparison:
    • "That" = the atomic arrangement of alumina glass
    • So we're comparing: the atomic arrangement of alumina glass to [something]
  • For this comparison to work properly, we need to compare like things to like things:
    • We can't compare "the atomic arrangement" to just "silica glass" (the material itself)
    • We need to compare "the atomic arrangement of alumina glass" to "the atomic arrangement of silica glass"
  • Looking at our choices:
    • Choice D says "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed"
      • This compares: atomic arrangement TO atomic arrangement
      • This maintains parallel structure in the comparison
    • The other choices break this parallelism:
      • Choices A and B compare "silica glass" (the material) to "that of alumina glass" (the arrangement)
      • Choice C compares "a disadvantage" to "that of alumina glass" (the arrangement)
  • So we need Choice D: "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed, resulting in a significant disadvantage:"
  • This properly compares the two atomic arrangements, then the rest of the sentence explains specifically how this dispersed arrangement creates a problem (atoms too far apart to re-form bonds).



Grammar Concept Applied

Maintaining Parallel Structure in Comparisons

When you set up a comparison using phrases like "compared to," you must compare equivalent things - the same types of nouns or noun phrases on both sides of the comparison. This is called maintaining parallel structure (or parallelism in grammar terms).

The Pattern:

  • Compared to X, Y [rest of sentence]
  • X and Y must be the same type of thing

Examples:

  • Incorrect: "Compared to the speed of light, sound moves much more slowly"
    • Comparing "the speed of light" to "sound" (not parallel)
  • Correct: "Compared to the speed of light, the speed of sound is much slower"
    • Comparing "the speed of light" to "the speed of sound" (parallel)

In this question:

  • "Compared to that of alumina glass" = compared to the atomic arrangement of alumina glass
  • Must compare to: "silica glass's atomic arrangement" (Choice D)
  • NOT to: "silica glass" (the material) or "a disadvantage"

The pronoun "that" stands in for "the atomic arrangement," so you need to explicitly name the corresponding element for silica glass: "silica glass's atomic arrangement."

Answer Choices Explained
A

silica glass is at a significant disadvantage due to its more dispersed atomic arrangement

✗ Incorrect

"silica glass is at a significant disadvantage due to its more dispersed atomic arrangement:"

  • This compares "silica glass" (the material itself) to "that of alumina glass" (which refers to the atomic arrangement)
  • You're comparing a material to an arrangement, which breaks parallel structure
  • The comparison should be arrangement-to-arrangement, not material-to-arrangement
B

silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement, resulting in a significant disadvantage

✗ Incorrect

"silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement, resulting in a significant disadvantage:"

  • Same fundamental problem as Choice A
  • "Silica glass" is being compared to "that of alumina glass" (the atomic arrangement)
  • This breaks parallelism because you need to compare atomic arrangements directly
C

a significant disadvantage of silica glass is that its atomic arrangement is more dispersed

✗ Incorrect

"a significant disadvantage of silica glass is that its atomic arrangement is more dispersed:"

  • This compares "a significant disadvantage" to "that of alumina glass" (the atomic arrangement)
  • This makes no logical sense - you can't compare a disadvantage to an atomic arrangement
  • Completely destroys the comparison structure
D

silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed, resulting in a significant disadvantage

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.