Compared to that of alumina glass, ________ silica glass atoms are so far apart that they are unable to re-form...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Compared to that of alumina glass, ________ silica glass atoms are so far apart that they are unable to re-form bonds after being separated.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
silica glass is at a significant disadvantage due to its more dispersed atomic arrangement
silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement, resulting in a significant disadvantage
a significant disadvantage of silica glass is that its atomic arrangement is more dispersed
silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed, resulting in a significant disadvantage
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Compared to that of alumina glass, [?]
- silica glass atoms are so far apart
- that they are unable to re-form bonds
- after being separated.
Understanding the Meaning
- Let's start reading from the beginning: 'Compared to that of alumina glass,'
- This opening phrase sets up a comparison:
- 'That' is standing in for something about alumina glass
- Most likely referring to alumina glass's atomic arrangement
- So we're comparing the atomic arrangement of alumina glass to something
- This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- Choice A: "silica glass is at a significant disadvantage..."
- Choice B: "silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement..."
- Choice C: "a significant disadvantage of silica glass is..."
- Choice D: "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed..."
- To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
- The sentence continues: 'silica glass atoms are so far apart that they are unable to re-form bonds after being separated.'
- This is giving us specific information:
- Silica glass atoms are very far apart from each other
- They're so far apart that once separated, they can't re-form bonds
- This is explaining a physical property and its consequence
- Now, what do we notice about the structure here?
- The opening phrase "Compared to that of alumina glass" creates a comparison:
- "That" = the atomic arrangement of alumina glass
- So we're comparing: the atomic arrangement of alumina glass to [something]
- For this comparison to work properly, we need to compare like things to like things:
- We can't compare "the atomic arrangement" to just "silica glass" (the material itself)
- We need to compare "the atomic arrangement of alumina glass" to "the atomic arrangement of silica glass"
- Looking at our choices:
- Choice D says "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed"
- This compares: atomic arrangement TO atomic arrangement
- This maintains parallel structure in the comparison
- The other choices break this parallelism:
- Choices A and B compare "silica glass" (the material) to "that of alumina glass" (the arrangement)
- Choice C compares "a disadvantage" to "that of alumina glass" (the arrangement)
- Choice D says "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed"
- So we need Choice D: "silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed, resulting in a significant disadvantage:"
- This properly compares the two atomic arrangements, then the rest of the sentence explains specifically how this dispersed arrangement creates a problem (atoms too far apart to re-form bonds).
Grammar Concept Applied
Maintaining Parallel Structure in Comparisons
When you set up a comparison using phrases like "compared to," you must compare equivalent things - the same types of nouns or noun phrases on both sides of the comparison. This is called maintaining parallel structure (or parallelism in grammar terms).
The Pattern:
- Compared to X, Y [rest of sentence]
- X and Y must be the same type of thing
Examples:
- Incorrect: "Compared to the speed of light, sound moves much more slowly"
- Comparing "the speed of light" to "sound" (not parallel)
- Correct: "Compared to the speed of light, the speed of sound is much slower"
- Comparing "the speed of light" to "the speed of sound" (parallel)
In this question:
- "Compared to that of alumina glass" = compared to the atomic arrangement of alumina glass
- Must compare to: "silica glass's atomic arrangement" (Choice D)
- NOT to: "silica glass" (the material) or "a disadvantage"
The pronoun "that" stands in for "the atomic arrangement," so you need to explicitly name the corresponding element for silica glass: "silica glass's atomic arrangement."
silica glass is at a significant disadvantage due to its more dispersed atomic arrangement
✗ Incorrect
"silica glass is at a significant disadvantage due to its more dispersed atomic arrangement:"
- This compares "silica glass" (the material itself) to "that of alumina glass" (which refers to the atomic arrangement)
- You're comparing a material to an arrangement, which breaks parallel structure
- The comparison should be arrangement-to-arrangement, not material-to-arrangement
silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement, resulting in a significant disadvantage
✗ Incorrect
"silica glass has a more dispersed atomic arrangement, resulting in a significant disadvantage:"
- Same fundamental problem as Choice A
- "Silica glass" is being compared to "that of alumina glass" (the atomic arrangement)
- This breaks parallelism because you need to compare atomic arrangements directly
a significant disadvantage of silica glass is that its atomic arrangement is more dispersed
✗ Incorrect
"a significant disadvantage of silica glass is that its atomic arrangement is more dispersed:"
- This compares "a significant disadvantage" to "that of alumina glass" (the atomic arrangement)
- This makes no logical sense - you can't compare a disadvantage to an atomic arrangement
- Completely destroys the comparison structure
silica glass's atomic arrangement is more dispersed, resulting in a significant disadvantage
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.