_____ decades of field observations across multiple continents, biologists have concluded that climate change is disrupting traditional migration patt...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
_____ decades of field observations across multiple continents, biologists have concluded that climate change is disrupting traditional migration patterns in numerous bird species.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
They compile
Compile
Compiling
To compile
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- [?] decades of field observations
- across multiple continents,
- biologists
- have concluded
- that climate change is disrupting traditional migration patterns
- in numerous bird species.
- that climate change is disrupting traditional migration patterns
- have concluded
Where [?] = They compile / Compile / Compiling / To compile
Understanding the Meaning
The sentence starts with the blank:
- '_____ decades of field observations across multiple continents,'
Then continues:
- 'biologists have concluded that climate change is disrupting traditional migration patterns in numerous bird species.'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- A. They compile
- B. Compile
- C. Compiling
- D. To compile
To see what works here, let's read the whole sentence and understand what it's saying!
The complete sentence is telling us:
- Biologists have reached a conclusion about climate change affecting bird migration.
- But HOW did they reach this conclusion?
- By compiling (gathering together) decades of field observations from multiple continents.
So the sentence structure is:
- [Something about compiling observations], biologists have concluded [their finding].
What do we notice about the structure here?
- 'biologists have concluded' is the main action of the sentence
- This is what the sentence is fundamentally telling us - biologists concluded something.
- The part before the comma is providing background information
- It's describing the METHOD or PROCESS by which they reached this conclusion.
- It's showing what they did in order to make this conclusion.
- Since 'have concluded' is already the main verb, we can't have another complete verb form in the blank.
- We need a form that creates a descriptive phrase, not a complete statement.
- The -ing form ('Compiling') creates exactly what we need here:
- It shows the ongoing process or method
- It connects to the main clause by describing how/why the conclusion was reached
- 'Compiling decades of field observations across multiple continents' becomes a phrase that sets up and leads into the main point.
So we need Choice C: Compiling
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Participles to Create Introductory Phrases
When you want to provide background information or show the method/process that led to the main action, you can use a participle (the -ing form of a verb, called a present participle in grammar terms) to create an introductory phrase:
Pattern:
- [Participle + object/details], [Subject + Main Verb + rest]
Example 1:
- Studying the data carefully, researchers discovered a new pattern.
- "Studying" = participle creating the introductory phrase
- "researchers discovered" = main subject and verb
- The studying is what led to the discovery
Example 2:
- Combining traditional methods with modern technology, the team achieved remarkable results.
- "Combining" = participle
- "the team achieved" = main action
- The combining is how they achieved the results
In our question:
- Compiling decades of field observations across multiple continents, biologists have concluded...
- "Compiling" = participle creating the introductory phrase
- "biologists have concluded" = main subject and verb
- The compiling is the process that led to the conclusion
The key is that the participial phrase provides context or method, while the main clause after the comma contains the primary action or statement of the sentence.
They compile
✗ Incorrect
- This creates a complete subject-verb statement: "They compile decades of field observations"
- When you connect this to another complete statement "biologists have concluded..." with just a comma, you create a comma splice - two complete thoughts incorrectly joined by only a comma
- Additionally, "they" doesn't have a clear reference - who is "they"?
Compile
✗ Incorrect
- This is a command form or bare verb that doesn't fit the sentence structure
- "Compile decades of field observations across multiple continents, biologists have concluded..." doesn't make grammatical sense
- You can't start with a command and then shift to a statement about what biologists concluded
Compiling
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
To compile
✗ Incorrect
- While "to compile" (infinitive form) can sometimes express purpose, it doesn't work here
- "To compile decades of field observations..., biologists have concluded..." would suggest that compiling is the purpose or goal, but that's backward
- The biologists already DID the compiling - that's how they reached their conclusion
- This creates an awkward and unclear meaning