Designed to identify new compounds with antibiotic properties in extreme environments, ______ involved collecting microbial samples from thermal vents...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Designed to identify new compounds with antibiotic properties in extreme environments, ______ involved collecting microbial samples from thermal vents in Yellowstone National Park. The analysis revealed three previously unknown bacterial species with promising pharmaceutical applications.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
biochemist Dr. Maria Chen's investigation
microbial samples from thermal vents were collected and the work
the collection of microbial samples from thermal vents
a research project funded by the National Science Foundation
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Designed to identify new compounds
- with antibiotic properties
- in extreme environments,
- with antibiotic properties
- [?]
- involved collecting microbial samples
- from thermal vents
- in Yellowstone National Park.
- from thermal vents
- involved collecting microbial samples
- The analysis
- revealed three previously unknown bacterial species
- with promising pharmaceutical applications.
- revealed three previously unknown bacterial species
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
'Designed to identify new compounds with antibiotic properties in extreme environments,'
This opening phrase is telling us the PURPOSE of something:
- Something was designed (created/planned)
- Its goal was to identify new compounds
- Specifically compounds with antibiotic properties
- Found in extreme environments
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- A. biochemist Dr. Maria Chen's investigation
- B. microbial samples from thermal vents were collected and the work
- C. the collection of microbial samples from thermal vents
- D. a research project funded by the National Science Foundation
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues: 'involved collecting microbial samples from thermal vents in Yellowstone National Park.'
So whatever fills the blank:
- was designed to identify new antibiotic compounds
- AND involved collecting microbial samples from Yellowstone
The second sentence adds: 'The analysis revealed three previously unknown bacterial species with promising pharmaceutical applications.'
This confirms we're talking about a scientific research study.
What do we notice about the structure here?
The opening phrase 'Designed to identify new compounds...' is a MODIFIER - it's describing whatever comes right after the comma.
- In English, when you start with a describing phrase followed by a comma,
- that phrase must logically describe the noun that comes right after
- So we need to ask: What can logically be "designed to identify" compounds?
Let's think through the choices:
- Can microbial samples be "designed to identify" something?
- No - samples don't identify things; they're what you collect
- Can "the collection" be designed?
- Awkward - plus it creates redundancy ("collection... involved collecting")
- Can a biochemist's investigation be designed?
- Awkward phrasing - investigations are conducted, not designed
- Can a research project be designed?
- YES! Research projects ARE designed with specific purposes
So we need Choice D: "a research project funded by the National Science Foundation"
This makes perfect sense: A research project can be designed to identify compounds, and a research project involves collecting samples.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Introductory Modifying Phrases Must Match What Follows
When a sentence begins with a descriptive phrase followed by a comma, that phrase must logically describe the noun that comes immediately after the comma. This is sometimes called a dangling modifier error (in grammar terms) when done incorrectly.
The Pattern:
- [Modifying phrase], [noun being modified] [rest of sentence]
Examples:
✓ Correct: "Designed to reduce energy costs, the new building features solar panels."
- "The new building" can logically be "designed" → makes sense
✗ Incorrect: "Designed to reduce energy costs, solar panels were installed in the new building."
- "Solar panels" cannot be "designed to reduce energy costs" (the building was designed; the panels were just part of it) → doesn't make logical sense
✓ Correct: "Hoping to improve test scores, the teacher created extra study sessions."
- "The teacher" can logically be "hoping" → makes sense
✗ Incorrect: "Hoping to improve test scores, extra study sessions were created."
- "Extra study sessions" cannot be "hoping" → doesn't make logical sense
In this question:
- The opening phrase "Designed to identify new compounds..." must describe something that can logically be "designed"
- Only "a research project" fits this requirement
- Research projects are things that ARE designed with specific purposes, making this the logical match
biochemist Dr. Maria Chen's investigation
"biochemist Dr. Maria Chen's investigation"
✗ Incorrect
- Creates awkward construction with the opening modifier
- Investigations are typically "conducted" or "carried out," not "designed"
- Doesn't work logically with "Designed to identify..."
microbial samples from thermal vents were collected and the work
"microbial samples from thermal vents were collected and the work"
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a logical impossibility: samples themselves cannot be "designed to identify" compounds
- Samples are what's being collected, not what's doing the designing or identifying
- Creates a confusing, grammatically incorrect run-on structure
the collection of microbial samples from thermal vents
"the collection of microbial samples from thermal vents"
✗ Incorrect
- Creates awkward redundancy: "Designed... the collection... involved collecting"
- Uses both "collection" and "collecting" in the same sentence awkwardly
- Less precise and clear than "research project"
a research project funded by the National Science Foundation
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.