Dr. Rocío Paola Caballero-Gill is a paleoceanographer. This means that Dr. Caballero-Gill doesn't just study oceans as they are today....
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Dr. Rocío Paola Caballero-Gill is a paleoceanographer. This means that Dr. Caballero-Gill doesn't just study oceans as they are today. She uses chemistry and fossil evidence ________ oceans as they were in the past.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
has studied
to study
studied
studies
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Sentence 1:
- Dr. Rocío Paola Caballero-Gill is a paleoceanographer.
- Sentence 2:
- This means that
- Dr. Caballero-Gill doesn't just study oceans as they are today.
- This means that
- Sentence 3:
- She uses chemistry and fossil evidence [? has studied/to study/studied/studies] oceans as they were in the past.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning:
Sentence 1 tells us:
- Dr. Rocío Paola Caballero-Gill is a paleoceanographer.
- This establishes her profession.
Sentence 2 explains what that means:
- 'This means that Dr. Caballero-Gill doesn't just study oceans as they are today.'
- So being a paleoceanographer involves more than studying current oceans.
Now we get to Sentence 3, which tells us what else she does:
- 'She uses chemistry and fossil evidence _____ oceans as they were in the past.'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- has studied, to study, studied, studies
To see what works here, let's understand what this sentence is telling us!
The sentence structure is:
- 'She uses chemistry and fossil evidence'
- 'uses' is telling us the main action - what she does
- 'chemistry and fossil evidence' are the tools she uses
Now what comes next needs to tell us:
- WHY she uses these tools, or
- WHAT PURPOSE these tools serve
When we continue reading: '_____ oceans as they were in the past'
- This is telling us the purpose - studying ancient oceans
- We need a form that expresses purpose or intention
What do we notice about the structure here?
- 'Uses' is the main action
- We need something that explains what purpose those tools serve
- The pattern is: uses [tools] _____ [what she does with those tools]
When we want to express purpose - to explain WHY someone does something - we use the infinitive form:
- She uses chemistry and fossil evidence TO STUDY oceans
So we need Choice B: to study
This creates the complete meaning:
- She uses chemistry and fossil evidence (the tools)
- to study oceans as they were in the past (the purpose of using those tools)
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Infinitives to Express Purpose
When you want to explain WHY someone does something or WHAT PURPOSE an action serves, you use the infinitive form (called 'infinitive of purpose' in grammar terms) - that's 'to' plus the base form of a verb:
Pattern: [Subject] + [main verb] + [object] + [to + verb] + [additional information]
Examples:
Example 1:
- She uses tools to fix cars.
- Main action: uses tools
- Purpose: to fix cars (why she uses the tools)
Example 2:
- Scientists collect data to understand climate patterns.
- Main action: collect data
- Purpose: to understand climate patterns
In our question:
- She uses chemistry and fossil evidence to study oceans as they were in the past.
- Main action: uses chemistry and fossil evidence
- Purpose: to study oceans (what she does with those tools)
The infinitive 'to study' depends on the main verb 'uses' and tells us the purpose or intention behind the action. It's not competing as another main verb - it's providing crucial information about why the main action happens.
has studied
✗ Incorrect
- This would create a second main verb: 'She uses chemistry and fossil evidence has studied oceans'
- You can't have two main verbs (uses, has studied) placed together like this without proper connection
- Additionally, present perfect tense doesn't fit - we're describing what she does in general, not something completed in the past
to study
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
studied
✗ Incorrect
- This also tries to create a second main verb: 'She uses chemistry and fossil evidence studied oceans'
- The sentence structure doesn't support having both 'uses' and 'studied' as main verbs without proper coordination (like 'and' between them)
- This is grammatically incorrect
studies
✗ Incorrect
- This attempts to create another main verb: 'She uses chemistry and fossil evidence studies oceans'
- We can't have 'uses' and 'studies' both as main verbs in this structure
- This creates a grammatical error - two verbs competing as the main action