prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Dr. Sarah Kim and biochemist Dr. Anton Petrov developed their groundbreaking cancer treatment through an effective ______ that combined Kim's...

GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions

Source: Prism
Craft and Structure
Words in Context
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Dr. Sarah Kim and biochemist Dr. Anton Petrov developed their groundbreaking cancer treatment through an effective ______ that combined Kim's pharmaceutical expertise with Petrov's innovative laboratory research methods.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?

A

collaboration

B

disagreement

C

investigation

D

rivalry

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Dr. Sarah Kim and biochemist Dr. Anton Petrov developed their groundbreaking cancer treatment through an effective"
  • What it says: Dr. Kim + Dr. Petrov created cancer breakthrough via effective [something].
  • What it does: Introduces two scientists who created something important together.
  • What it is: Context/setup
[MISSING WORD]
  • What it is: Missing logical connector
"that combined Kim's pharmaceutical expertise with Petrov's innovative laboratory research methods."
  • What it says: Combined Kim's pharma skills + Petrov's lab methods.
  • What it does: Explains how their different specialties were brought together.
  • What it is: Explanation of mechanism

Part B: Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: Two scientists with different expertise areas worked together effectively to develop an important cancer treatment.

Argument Flow: The passage establishes that two scientists achieved something significant, then explains that this achievement happened by bringing together their complementary skill sets.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The right answer should describe how two people with different expertise worked together
  • It should indicate a positive, productive relationship since they achieved a groundbreaking result
  • It must make sense with combining pharmaceutical expertise with laboratory research methods
  • The word should capture the cooperative nature that allowed them to merge their different skills effectively
Answer Choices Explained
A

collaboration

✓ Correct
  • Collaboration means working together cooperatively toward a shared goal
  • Perfectly matches our prethinking about a productive partnership
  • Makes logical sense: an effective collaboration that combined their expertise
B

disagreement

✗ Incorrect
  • Disagreement suggests conflict or opposing views
  • Contradicts the successful outcome described
C

investigation

✗ Incorrect
  • Investigation describes what they might have done during their research
  • Does not capture the interpersonal working relationship between the two scientists
D

rivalry

✗ Incorrect
  • Rivalry suggests competition between the scientists
  • Contradicts the idea of combining expertise harmoniously
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.