During the 1970s, the National Archives undertook a massive preservation initiative, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
During the 1970s, the National Archives undertook a massive preservation initiative, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War _____ thousands of photographs and letters required immediate conservation treatment.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
documents motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records:
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records,
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records;
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- During the 1970s,
- the National Archives
- undertook a massive preservation initiative,
- motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of
- Civil War documents [? punctuation and possible additional text]
- motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of
- undertook a massive preservation initiative,
- the National Archives
- thousands of photographs and letters
- required immediate conservation treatment.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
- 'During the 1970s, the National Archives undertook a massive preservation initiative'
- This tells us about a big preservation project in the 1970s
- 'motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War documents'
- This explains WHY they did this initiative - the Civil War documents were falling apart
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at our choices:
- Choices B, C, and D all have: "documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records"
- They differ in what punctuation comes at the end
- Choice A is structured differently (no comma after documents, uses colon)
To see what punctuation works here, let's read what comes next and understand what the complete sentence is saying!
The sentence continues:
- 'thousands of photographs and letters required immediate conservation treatment'
Let me break down what this part means:
- 'thousands of photographs and letters' = the subject (what we're talking about)
- 'required' = the action/verb
- 'immediate conservation treatment' = what was needed
So this part is telling us: thousands of items NEEDED conservation treatment right away.
Now let's understand what comes before (using choice C as our guide):
- 'the National Archives undertook a massive preservation initiative, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records'
Wait - this has "motivated" twice! Let me reconsider the structure.
Actually, looking more carefully at the choices, the phrase "motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records" appears to be part of what fills the blank. So the structure is:
FIRST COMPLETE THOUGHT:
- 'During the 1970s, the National Archives undertook a massive preservation initiative, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War documents'
- Subject: the National Archives
- Verb: undertook
- Object: initiative
- Additional info: this initiative was motivated by deteriorating documents
SECOND COMPLETE THOUGHT:
- 'thousands of photographs and letters required immediate conservation treatment'
- Subject: thousands of photographs and letters
- Verb: required
- Object: treatment
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have TWO independent clauses - two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as sentences
- First: Archives undertook an initiative
- Second: thousands of items required treatment
- These two complete thoughts need proper punctuation between them
- When you have two independent clauses that are closely related, you can connect them with a semicolon
So we need: Choice C with the semicolon
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Connecting Two Independent Clauses with Semicolons
When you have two complete thoughts (called independent clauses in grammar terms) - meaning each part has its own subject and verb and could stand alone as a sentence - you need to connect them with appropriate punctuation.
Correct ways to connect independent clauses:
- Semicolon - when the clauses are closely related:
- First clause: "The museum opened a new exhibit"
- Second clause: "hundreds of visitors attended the first day"
- Connected: "The museum opened a new exhibit; hundreds of visitors attended the first day."
- Period - when you want complete separation:
- "The museum opened a new exhibit. Hundreds of visitors attended."
- Comma + coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, nor, for, so, yet):
- "The museum opened a new exhibit, and hundreds of visitors attended."
Incorrect ways (errors to avoid):
- Just a comma - creates a comma splice:
- "The museum opened a new exhibit, hundreds of visitors attended."
- No punctuation - creates a run-on sentence:
- "The museum opened a new exhibit hundreds of visitors attended."
How this applies to our question:
- First independent clause: "the National Archives undertook a massive preservation initiative, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War documents"
- Second independent clause: "thousands of photographs and letters required immediate conservation treatment"
- These are closely related thoughts about preservation needs, so a semicolon perfectly connects them
documents motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records:
documents motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records:
✗ Incorrect
- This choice is missing the comma after "documents," which would properly set off the descriptive phrase that follows
- The colon at the end is not the appropriate punctuation for connecting these two independent clauses
- While colons can connect clauses, they're typically used when the second clause explains or elaborates on the first in a specific way, which isn't the case here
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records,
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records,
✗ Incorrect
- This creates a comma splice - using just a comma to connect two independent clauses
- This is a grammatical error; you cannot connect two complete thoughts with only a comma
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records;
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records
documents, motivated largely by the deteriorating condition of Civil War records
✗ Incorrect
- This creates a run-on sentence - two independent clauses with no punctuation between them at all
- The two complete thoughts run together without proper separation, which is grammatically incorrect