prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

During the decades-long movement to codify the rights of Latinos in the US, certain events were pivotal: the founding of...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Official
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

During the decades-long movement to codify the rights of Latinos in the US, certain events were pivotal: the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in ________ Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

1929. For one, the

B

1929, for one, the

C

1929 for one, the

D

1929, for one. The

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • During the decades-long movement
  • to codify the rights of Latinos in the US,
  • certain events
  • were pivotal:
  • the founding of social justice group
  • the League of United Latin American Citizens
  • in [?]Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966,
  • which affirmed the rights of Latino voters,
  • is another such event.

  • Where [?] represents: 1929[punctuation?]for one[punctuation?][The/the]

Understanding the Meaning

Let's read from the beginning:

"During the decades-long movement to codify the rights of Latinos in the US, certain events were pivotal:"

  • The passage is about a long movement to establish Latino rights in the US
  • Certain events were pivotal (extremely important) in this movement
  • The colon signals that examples are coming

"the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in 1929"

  • This is one example of a pivotal event
  • The League of United Latin American Citizens was founded in 1929

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • They vary in punctuation after "1929" and "for one"
  • They vary in whether "for one" and "The" are capitalized

To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what it's saying:

"Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event."

  • This mentions a different event - a court decision from 1966
  • This decision affirmed (supported/confirmed) Latino voting rights
  • This IS "another such event" - another pivotal event

Now let's understand what we have structurally:

First part after the colon:

  • "the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in 1929"
    • This is a noun phrase - it's describing something
    • But it's NOT a complete sentence on its own
    • There's no verb making a statement about this founding

Second part:

  • "Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event"
    • Subject: "Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters"
    • Verb: "is"
    • This IS a complete sentence - it can stand alone

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • We have a noun phrase example (the founding...) followed by a complete sentence (the Katzenbach decision... is another event)
  • These are two separate structural units that need proper separation
  • The phrase "for one" means "as one example"
    • It makes sense attached to the first example: "the founding... in 1929, for one"
    • This parenthetical expression should be set off by commas
  • Then we need to start a new sentence about the other example

So we need: comma before "for one," period after "for one," and capital "The" to start the new sentence

The correct answer is Choice D: "1929, for one. The"


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Separating Complete Sentences from Noun Phrases

When you have a noun phrase (a group of words centered around a noun but without a verb making a complete statement) followed by a complete sentence (subject + verb making a complete thought), you need to separate them properly:

Noun phrase example:

  • "the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in 1929, for one"
    • This describes something but doesn't make a complete statement
    • The parenthetical "for one" (set off by commas) adds the meaning "as one example"

Complete sentence:

  • "The Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event"
    • Subject: the court decision (with its modifiers)
    • Verb: is
    • This makes a complete statement

The punctuation rule:

  • When a complete sentence follows a noun phrase or fragment, use a period to end the first unit and start the new sentence with a capital letter
  • Parenthetical expressions like "for one" should be set off by commas

In this question:

  • The noun phrase ends: "...in 1929, for one."
  • The new sentence begins: "The Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision..."
Answer Choices Explained
A

1929. For one, the

✗ Incorrect

  • This places "For one" at the beginning of the second sentence
  • This creates: "For one, the Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision... is another such event"
  • This is awkward and illogical - the sentence already identifies itself as "another such event," so starting with "For one" is redundant and doesn't make grammatical sense
  • "For one" should modify the first example, not introduce the second
B

1929, for one, the

✗ Incorrect

  • This tries to keep everything as one sentence
  • The resulting structure: "certain events were pivotal: the founding... in 1929, for one, the Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision... is another such event"
  • This creates a grammatical problem - you have two noun phrases but only the second one has a verb ("is")
  • The first noun phrase (the founding...) has no verb connecting it properly to the sentence structure
C

1929 for one, the

✗ Incorrect

  • This is missing punctuation after "1929"
  • "For one" is a parenthetical expression that needs to be set off by punctuation on both sides
  • Without the comma after "1929," this creates a run-on with awkward flow
D

1929, for one. The

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.