During the decades-long movement to codify the rights of Latinos in the US, certain events were pivotal: the founding of...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
During the decades-long movement to codify the rights of Latinos in the US, certain events were pivotal: the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in ________ Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
1929. For one, the
1929, for one, the
1929 for one, the
1929, for one. The
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- During the decades-long movement
- to codify the rights of Latinos in the US,
- certain events
- were pivotal:
- the founding of social justice group
- the League of United Latin American Citizens
- in [?]Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966,
- which affirmed the rights of Latino voters,
- is another such event.
- Where [?] represents: 1929[punctuation?]for one[punctuation?][The/the]
Understanding the Meaning
Let's read from the beginning:
"During the decades-long movement to codify the rights of Latinos in the US, certain events were pivotal:"
- The passage is about a long movement to establish Latino rights in the US
- Certain events were pivotal (extremely important) in this movement
- The colon signals that examples are coming
"the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in 1929"
- This is one example of a pivotal event
- The League of United Latin American Citizens was founded in 1929
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- They vary in punctuation after "1929" and "for one"
- They vary in whether "for one" and "The" are capitalized
To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what it's saying:
"Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event."
- This mentions a different event - a court decision from 1966
- This decision affirmed (supported/confirmed) Latino voting rights
- This IS "another such event" - another pivotal event
Now let's understand what we have structurally:
First part after the colon:
- "the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in 1929"
- This is a noun phrase - it's describing something
- But it's NOT a complete sentence on its own
- There's no verb making a statement about this founding
Second part:
- "Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event"
- Subject: "Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters"
- Verb: "is"
- This IS a complete sentence - it can stand alone
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have a noun phrase example (the founding...) followed by a complete sentence (the Katzenbach decision... is another event)
- These are two separate structural units that need proper separation
- The phrase "for one" means "as one example"
- It makes sense attached to the first example: "the founding... in 1929, for one"
- This parenthetical expression should be set off by commas
- Then we need to start a new sentence about the other example
So we need: comma before "for one," period after "for one," and capital "The" to start the new sentence
The correct answer is Choice D: "1929, for one. The"
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Separating Complete Sentences from Noun Phrases
When you have a noun phrase (a group of words centered around a noun but without a verb making a complete statement) followed by a complete sentence (subject + verb making a complete thought), you need to separate them properly:
Noun phrase example:
- "the founding of social justice group the League of United Latin American Citizens in 1929, for one"
- This describes something but doesn't make a complete statement
- The parenthetical "for one" (set off by commas) adds the meaning "as one example"
Complete sentence:
- "The Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision in 1966, which affirmed the rights of Latino voters, is another such event"
- Subject: the court decision (with its modifiers)
- Verb: is
- This makes a complete statement
The punctuation rule:
- When a complete sentence follows a noun phrase or fragment, use a period to end the first unit and start the new sentence with a capital letter
- Parenthetical expressions like "for one" should be set off by commas
In this question:
- The noun phrase ends: "...in 1929, for one."
- The new sentence begins: "The Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision..."
1929. For one, the
✗ Incorrect
- This places "For one" at the beginning of the second sentence
- This creates: "For one, the Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision... is another such event"
- This is awkward and illogical - the sentence already identifies itself as "another such event," so starting with "For one" is redundant and doesn't make grammatical sense
- "For one" should modify the first example, not introduce the second
1929, for one, the
✗ Incorrect
- This tries to keep everything as one sentence
- The resulting structure: "certain events were pivotal: the founding... in 1929, for one, the Katzenbach v. Morgan court decision... is another such event"
- This creates a grammatical problem - you have two noun phrases but only the second one has a verb ("is")
- The first noun phrase (the founding...) has no verb connecting it properly to the sentence structure
1929 for one, the
✗ Incorrect
- This is missing punctuation after "1929"
- "For one" is a parenthetical expression that needs to be set off by punctuation on both sides
- Without the comma after "1929," this creates a run-on with awkward flow
1929, for one. The
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.