prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Text 1Educational research has consistently shown that students learn most effectively through direct instruction, where teachers present information ...

GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions

Source: Prism
Craft and Structure
Cross-Text Connections
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query
Text 1

Educational research has consistently shown that students learn most effectively through direct instruction, where teachers present information in structured, sequential lessons. This traditional approach, supported by decades of classroom studies, holds that clear teacher guidance and systematic content delivery are essential for academic achievement, regardless of individual student preferences or learning styles.


Text 2

However, Dr. Sarah Chen and her research team conducted a study examining student engagement across different instructional methods. When students were allowed to choose their own learning pathways and set personal goals within the curriculum, test scores improved significantly compared to traditional direct instruction groups. The researchers found that student autonomy in learning increased both motivation and retention rates.

Based on the texts, how would Dr. Chen and her research team (Text 2) most likely respond to the traditional approach discussed in Text 1?

A

By arguing that direct instruction fails to produce any measurable academic gains in modern classrooms

B

By suggesting that effective learning may not be exclusively dependent on teacher-directed systematic instruction

C

By acknowledging that structured lessons work well but proposing that they should be supplemented with technology

D

By disputing the validity of decades of classroom studies that support traditional teaching methods

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Educational research has consistently shown that students learn most effectively through direct instruction, where teachers present information in structured, sequential lessons."
  • What it says: Research shows direct instruction is most effective with structured lessons
  • What it does: Introduces the research consensus on effective teaching
  • What it is: Opening claim with research backing
"This traditional approach, supported by decades of classroom studies, holds that clear teacher guidance and systematic content delivery are essential for academic achievement,"
  • What it says: Traditional method supported by decades of studies with teacher guidance being essential
  • What it does: Reinforces the claim with additional evidence
  • What it is: Supporting evidence
"regardless of individual student preferences or learning styles."
  • What it says: Student preferences do not matter
  • What it does: Emphasizes universality of direct instruction
  • What it is: Qualifying detail
"However, Dr. Sarah Chen and her research team conducted a study examining student engagement across different instructional methods."
  • What it says: Chen's team studied different teaching methods
  • What it does: Introduces contrasting research
  • What it is: Transition to alternative perspective
"When students were allowed to choose their own learning pathways and set personal goals within the curriculum, test scores improved significantly compared to traditional direct instruction groups."
  • What it says: Student choice and personal goals led to better test scores than traditional method
  • What it does: Presents findings that contradict previous claims
  • What it is: Key research finding
"The researchers found that student autonomy in learning increased both motivation and retention rates."
  • What it says: Student autonomy increases motivation and retention
  • What it does: Provides additional benefits of student-choice approach
  • What it is: Supporting evidence

Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: Two contrasting research perspectives exist on effective teaching - traditional direct instruction versus student-autonomy approaches.

Argument Flow: Text 1 establishes the traditional research consensus that direct instruction works best for all students. Text 2 then presents Dr. Chen's research showing that giving students autonomy and choice actually produces better results than the traditional approach, challenging the established view.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

What's being asked? How Dr. Chen and her team would most likely respond to the traditional approach from Text 1

What type of answer do we need? A prediction of their likely reaction or argument based on their research findings

Any limiting keywords? "most likely" indicates we need the most reasonable response given their research findings

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • Dr. Chen's team found that student autonomy produces better results than traditional direct instruction
  • Their response would likely challenge the idea that direct instruction is the only effective method
  • They would suggest that alternative approaches can be more effective
  • They would point to their evidence showing student choice works better
  • They would not completely dismiss traditional methods but show they are not the exclusive answer
Answer Choices Explained
A

By arguing that direct instruction fails to produce any measurable academic gains in modern classrooms

Claims direct instruction produces NO measurable gains
✗ Incorrect

  • Too extreme, Chen's study showed their method was better but did not claim traditional methods are completely useless
B

By suggesting that effective learning may not be exclusively dependent on teacher-directed systematic instruction

Suggests effective learning is not exclusively dependent on teacher-directed instruction
✓ Correct

  • Perfectly matches Chen's findings that student autonomy can be more effective and aligns with their evidence showing alternatives work better
C

By acknowledging that structured lessons work well but proposing that they should be supplemented with technology

Mentions supplementing with technology
✗ Incorrect

  • Chen's research focused on student autonomy and choice, not technology
D

By disputing the validity of decades of classroom studies that support traditional teaching methods

Claims Chen would dispute the validity of decades of studies
✗ Incorrect

  • Chen's team presented new findings but did not attack the credibility of previous research
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.