The groundbreaking discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena ______ have revolutionized our understanding of coral reef regeneration in warming oceans...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The groundbreaking discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena ______ have revolutionized our understanding of coral reef regeneration in warming oceans.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Vasquez,
Vasquez
Vasquez;
Vasquez:
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
• The groundbreaking discoveries
• of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez[?]
• have revolutionized our understanding
• of coral reef regeneration
• in warming oceans.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
'The groundbreaking discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez...'
This is where we have the blank - right after the name.
Let's look at the choices:
- We're deciding whether to put a comma, no punctuation, a semicolon, or a colon after "Vasquez."
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues: 'have revolutionized our understanding of coral reef regeneration in warming oceans.'
Now let's understand what the complete sentence is telling us:
- 'The groundbreaking discoveries'
- This is what the sentence is fundamentally about - some important discoveries
- 'of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez'
- This tells us whose discoveries these are
- This phrase is describing and identifying which discoveries we're talking about
- It's not extra bonus information - it's essential to knowing what the subject is
- 'have revolutionized our understanding of coral reef regeneration in warming oceans'
- This tells us what those discoveries did - they changed how we understand coral reefs
What do we notice about the structure here?
- The complete subject of the sentence is:
- "The groundbreaking discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez"
- This whole phrase is ONE unit - it all works together to tell us what we're talking about
- The verb is "have revolutionized"
- The phrase "of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez" is an essential part of the subject
- It flows naturally as part of identifying whose discoveries these are
- It's not additional information being added on - it's built into the subject
The key principle: You don't put punctuation between a subject and its verb. The sentence needs to flow naturally from the complete subject to what it's doing.
So we need no punctuation after Vasquez. The correct answer is B.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Subject-Verb Connection: Don't Separate with Punctuation
One of the fundamental rules in English grammar is that you should not put punctuation between a subject and its verb. The subject and verb form the core of the sentence, and they need to flow together naturally.
The Pattern:
- Subject + Verb + rest of sentence
- No punctuation between subject and verb
Even when the subject is long or contains descriptive phrases:
- Long Subject Example:
- Subject: "The discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez"
- Verb: "have revolutionized"
- ✓ CORRECT: "The discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez have revolutionized..."
- ✗ INCORRECT: "The discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez, have revolutionized..."
In our question:
- Subject: "The groundbreaking discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez"
- This whole phrase (including "of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez") is the subject
- The phrase "of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez" is an essential part that identifies whose discoveries
- Verb: "have revolutionized"
- Because the subject flows directly to the verb, no punctuation should interrupt this connection
Key Understanding: Just because a name appears in the subject doesn't mean you need punctuation after it. If the name is part of a descriptive phrase that's essential to the subject, let it flow naturally to the verb.
Vasquez,
✗ Incorrect
- Putting a comma here would incorrectly separate the subject from its verb "have revolutionized"
- A comma would break up the natural flow from what the sentence is about (the discoveries) to what they did (revolutionized)
- The comma would also incorrectly suggest that "of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez" is optional extra information, when it's actually an essential part of identifying the subject
Vasquez
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
Vasquez;
✗ Incorrect
- A semicolon is used to connect two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as sentences
- "The groundbreaking discoveries of marine biologist Dr. Elena Vasquez" is not a complete thought - it has no verb
- This would create a fragment before the semicolon, which is grammatically incorrect
Vasquez:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration of what came before
- What follows "Vasquez" is the verb phrase "have revolutionized our understanding..." - this is telling us what the discoveries DID, not explaining or elaborating on what they are
- A colon doesn't fit the logical relationship between these parts