prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Embraced by leading financial institutions, the Compliance Transparency Initiative represents a regulatory framework that guarantees whistleblower com...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Prism
Information and Ideas
Inferences
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Embraced by leading financial institutions, the Compliance Transparency Initiative represents a regulatory framework that guarantees whistleblower compensation whenever their disclosures of regulatory breaches result in enforcement proceedings. However, this initiative contains significant flaws. In particular, it allows financial institutions to demand that their settlement arrangements and compliance correction strategies be maintained as classified regulatory data. As a result, certain financial regulatory watchdogs express concern that this initiative might unintentionally lead to ________

Which choice most logically completes the text?

A

reducing the financial compensation that whistleblowers might obtain from their reports of regulatory violations.

B

preventing external auditors from assessing whether settlement agreements ensure adequate remediation of reported violations.

C

limiting the compliance training that banks conduct following whistleblower reports of regulatory violations.

D

discouraging whistleblowers from developing new approaches to detecting regulatory violations through bank cooperation.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Embraced by leading financial institutions, the Compliance Transparency Initiative represents a regulatory framework that guarantees whistleblower compensation whenever their disclosures of regulatory breaches result in enforcement proceedings."
  • What it says: Initiative = guaranteed money for whistleblowers when disclosures lead to enforcement.
  • What it does: Introduces the regulatory framework and its key benefit.
  • What it is: Context/background information
"However, this initiative contains significant flaws."
  • What it says: Initiative has problems.
  • What it does: Signals a shift to identify problems with what was just described.
  • What it is: Transition to criticism
"In particular, it allows financial institutions to demand that their settlement arrangements and compliance correction strategies be maintained as classified regulatory data."
  • What it says: Banks can keep settlements and fixes secret/classified.
  • What it does: Provides the specific flaw being criticized.
  • What it is: Evidence/example of the flaw
"As a result, certain financial regulatory watchdogs express concern that this initiative might unintentionally lead to ________"
  • What it says: Watchdogs worried about unintended consequence.
  • What it does: Sets up the logical conclusion about what problem this secrecy creates.
  • What it is: Incomplete conclusion requiring inference

Provide Passage Architecture and Core Elements

  • Main Point: The Compliance Transparency Initiative, while protecting whistleblowers financially, creates concerns because it allows institutions to classify their settlement information.
  • Argument Flow: The passage presents a regulatory framework with a positive feature (whistleblower protection), then pivots to reveal a significant flaw (allowing secrecy around settlements), leading to concerns about what negative consequence this secrecy might create.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

What's being asked? We need to complete the logical thought about what unintended consequence the secrecy provision might create.

What type of answer do we need? A logical inference about what problem could result from allowing settlement arrangements and compliance strategies to be kept classified.

Any limiting keywords? None specified.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The key issue is that settlement arrangements and compliance correction strategies can be kept classified
  • This secrecy would logically prevent outside parties from being able to review or evaluate these settlements
  • The concern would be that if settlements are secret, no one external can verify whether they're actually adequate or effective
  • This creates a transparency problem where the adequacy of remediation cannot be assessed by independent parties
Answer Choices Explained
A

reducing the financial compensation that whistleblowers might obtain from their reports of regulatory violations.

✗ Incorrect

  • Suggests reducing whistleblower compensation
  • The passage explicitly states the initiative guarantees whistleblower compensation, so this directly contradicts a stated benefit
B

preventing external auditors from assessing whether settlement agreements ensure adequate remediation of reported violations.

✓ Correct

  • Identifies that external auditors could not assess settlement adequacy
  • Directly follows from our analysis: if settlement arrangements are classified, external parties cannot review them to verify they provide adequate remediation
C

limiting the compliance training that banks conduct following whistleblower reports of regulatory violations.

✗ Incorrect

  • Focuses on limiting compliance training
  • The classified information provision does not logically connect to reducing training programs
D

discouraging whistleblowers from developing new approaches to detecting regulatory violations through bank cooperation.

✗ Incorrect

  • About discouraging whistleblower innovation in detection methods
  • The secrecy provision affects post-disclosure settlements, not the detection process itself
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.