For decades, astronomers could only theorize about the existence of black holes through indirect observations of their gravitational effects. Recent...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
For decades, astronomers could only theorize about the existence of black holes through indirect observations of their gravitational effects. Recent technological breakthroughs have changed _____ the Event Horizon Telescope captured the first direct image of a black hole in 2019.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
that though,
that, though:
that. Though:
that though:
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- For decades,
- astronomers
- could only theorize about the existence of black holes
- through indirect observations
- of their gravitational effects.
- through indirect observations
- could only theorize about the existence of black holes
- astronomers
- Recent technological breakthroughs
- have changed that[?, though?]
- the Event Horizon Telescope
- captured the first direct image of a black hole
- in 2019.
- captured the first direct image of a black hole
- the Event Horizon Telescope
- have changed that[?, though?]
Understanding the Meaning
Let's read from the beginning to understand what this passage is telling us.
The first sentence sets up the historical situation:
- 'For decades, astronomers could only theorize about the existence of black holes through indirect observations of their gravitational effects.'
- Astronomers couldn't actually see black holes directly
- They could only make theories based on observing gravitational effects
Now the second sentence begins:
- 'Recent technological breakthroughs have changed that'
- 'That' refers to the old limitation
- Technology has changed the situation - astronomers can now do more than just theorize
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- All choices have 'that' followed by 'though'
- What varies is the punctuation:
- Comma or no comma after 'that'
- Different punctuation after 'though' (comma, colon, or both)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying:
- 'the Event Horizon Telescope captured the first direct image of a black hole in 2019'
- This gives us a specific, concrete example
- It shows exactly HOW the breakthroughs changed things
Now let's understand what we have structurally:
- 'Recent technological breakthroughs have changed that'
- This is a complete thought on its own
- 'the Event Horizon Telescope captured the first direct image of a black hole in 2019'
- This is also a complete thought
- But it's providing a specific example of the first part
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have two complete thoughts where the second one gives a specific example of the first
- This is exactly when we use a colon - to introduce an explanation or example
- The word 'though' in this context works as a transitional element
- It adds a conversational tone, like 'here's what I mean'
- Transitional elements need to be set off with commas
So we need: a comma after 'that' to set off 'though,' then a colon after 'though' to introduce the specific example.
The correct answer is B: 'that, though:'
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Colons to Introduce Explanations with Transitional Elements
When you have two complete thoughts and the second one provides a specific example or explanation of the first, you can use a colon to connect them. If you include a transitional word (like 'though,' 'namely,' or 'specifically') before the colon, that transitional element needs to be set off with a comma:
Pattern: Complete thought + comma + transitional word + colon + explanatory example
Example 1:
- Without transition: 'The experiment confirmed our hypothesis: the bacteria grew faster in warmer temperatures.'
- With transition: 'The experiment confirmed our hypothesis, specifically: the bacteria grew faster in warmer temperatures.'
Example 2:
- 'The museum acquired several new pieces, though: a Monet painting arrived just yesterday.'
- 'The museum acquired several new pieces, though' = complete thought
- comma sets off 'though'
- colon introduces the specific example
- 'a Monet painting arrived just yesterday' = the specific example
In our question:
- 'Recent technological breakthroughs have changed that, though: the Event Horizon Telescope captured the first direct image of a black hole in 2019.'
- First part: complete thought about change
- 'though' adds conversational transition
- Colon introduces the concrete example of that change
The key is recognizing when the second clause provides an example or explanation (use a colon) and properly punctuating any transitional elements (use commas).
that though,
✗ Incorrect
- Missing the comma after 'that' that's needed to set off the transitional word 'though'
- Using only a comma after 'though' creates a comma splice - you can't join two complete independent clauses with just a comma
- Doesn't properly establish the explanatory relationship between the two parts
that, though:
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
that. Though:
✗ Incorrect
- The period breaks this into separate sentences unnecessarily
- Starting a sentence with 'Though:' is awkward and non-standard
- Disrupts the natural flow of the explanation
that though:
✗ Incorrect
- Missing the comma after 'that' that's needed to set off 'though'
- While the colon is correct for introducing the example, the transitional element 'though' must be separated with a comma