prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Founded in Germany in 1919, the Bauhaus was a revolutionary art school that ______ modernist principles by combining fine arts...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Founded in Germany in 1919, the Bauhaus was a revolutionary art school that ______ modernist principles by combining fine arts with practical crafts and industrial design.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

to champion

B

championed

C

championing

D

having championed

Solution

Sentence Structure

  • Founded in Germany in 1919,
    • the Bauhaus
      • was a revolutionary art school
        • that [?] modernist principles
          • by combining fine arts with practical crafts and industrial design.
  • Where [?] represents what varies in the choices:
    • A. to champion
    • B. championed
    • C. championing
    • D. having championed

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start reading from the beginning:

  • 'Founded in Germany in 1919,'
    • This gives us background – when and where the Bauhaus was founded.
  • 'the Bauhaus'
    • This is what we're talking about – our subject.
  • 'was a revolutionary art school'
    • So the Bauhaus was a type of school, one that was revolutionary.

Now we come to: 'that ______ modernist principles'

  • This phrase starting with 'that' is telling us more about this art school.
  • It's describing what the school DID with modernist principles.

Here's where we need to fill in the blank. Let's look at our choices:

  • We're deciding between different forms of the verb "champion"
  • The blank comes after 'that' in a phrase that's describing the art school

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • 'That ______ modernist principles' is a relative clause
    • It's giving us more information about the art school
    • 'That' refers back to the art school (the Bauhaus)
  • Within this clause, we need a complete verb
    • The clause is telling us what action the school took
    • We're describing historical fact – what this school did back then

So we need a complete verb in the past tense: championed.

Now let's read the rest to see the complete picture:

  • 'by combining fine arts with practical crafts and industrial design'
    • This tells us HOW the Bauhaus championed modernist principles
    • It combined different types of art and design together

The complete meaning: The Bauhaus was a revolutionary art school that promoted modernist principles by bringing together fine arts, crafts, and industrial design.


Grammar Concept Applied

Finite Verbs in Relative Clauses

When you have a relative clause (a clause that starts with words like "that," "which," or "who" and provides additional information about something), you need a finite verb – a complete verb form that shows tense and can function as the main verb of that clause.

Here's the pattern:

Relative pronoun + finite verb:

  • The school that championed modernist principles... (checkmark)
  • "that" = relative pronoun
  • "championed" = finite verb (past tense)

What doesn't work:

  • The school that to champion... (cross) (infinitive cannot be main verb)
  • The school that championing... (cross) (participle alone cannot be main verb)
  • The school that having championed... (cross) (perfect participle cannot be main verb of relative clause)

In this question:

  • The relative clause "that _______ modernist principles" describes the art school
  • "That" is the subject of the clause (referring to the Bauhaus)
  • We need a finite verb to complete the clause: "championed"
  • Since we're describing historical fact, past tense is appropriate
Answer Choices Explained
A

to champion

✗ Incorrect

  • The infinitive form "to champion" cannot serve as the main verb in a relative clause
  • This would create an incomplete structure – the clause "that to champion modernist principles" doesn't work grammatically
  • You need a complete verb form after "that," not an infinitive
B

championed

✓ Correct

  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
C

championing

✗ Incorrect

  • The present participle "championing" by itself cannot be the main verb of the clause
  • This would leave the clause without a complete verb, making it a fragment
  • You would need a helping verb (like "was championing") for this to work, but we don't have one
D

having championed

✗ Incorrect

  • The perfect participle "having championed" is used to show one action completed before another action, typically in descriptive phrases
  • It cannot serve as the main verb in a relative clause like this
  • This creates an awkward and grammatically incorrect structure
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.