In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia. Over two centuries later,...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia. Over two centuries later, in 1993, ______ added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register as a document of global historical significance.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
they were
some were
this was
it was
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- In 1776,
- Thomas Jefferson
- drafted a detailed manuscript
- outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia.
- drafted a detailed manuscript
- Thomas Jefferson
- Over two centuries later,
- in 1993,
- [?]
- added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register
- as a document of global historical significance.
- added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register
- [?]
- in 1993,
- Where [?] = they were / some were / this was / it was
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start by reading the first sentence:
'In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia.'
So we have:
- Thomas Jefferson wrote a manuscript in 1776
- This manuscript was about religious freedom in Virginia
Now the second sentence begins:
'Over two centuries later, in 1993...'
- 'Over two centuries later' means about 200+ years after 1776
- So this is jumping forward to 1993
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- A: they were
- B: some were
- C: this was
- D: it was
So we're deciding which pronoun works here. To understand what pronoun fits, let's read the rest of the sentence:
'______ added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register as a document of global historical significance.'
Now let's understand what this is telling us:
- Something was added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 1993
- It was recognized as historically significant
What do we notice?
The second sentence is talking about what happened to Jefferson's manuscript:
- The first sentence tells us: Jefferson drafted "a detailed manuscript"
- The second sentence tells us: this manuscript was added to a UNESCO register in 1993
We need a pronoun that refers back to "a detailed manuscript":
- "Manuscript" is singular
- We need a singular pronoun to match
- "It" is the correct pronoun for referring to a singular object (the manuscript)
So the correct answer is D: it was.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Pronouns Must Agree with What They Refer To
When you use a pronoun, it must match its antecedent (the noun it refers back to) in number—singular or plural. This is especially important when the pronoun and antecedent are in different sentences.
The pattern:
- Singular antecedent → singular pronoun
- "The scientist made a discovery. It changed everything."
- "discovery" (singular) → "it" (singular) (tick mark)
- Plural antecedent → plural pronoun
- "The scientists made discoveries. They changed everything."
- "discoveries" (plural) → "they" (plural) (tick mark)
What doesn't work:
- Singular antecedent → plural pronoun (cross)
- "The scientist made a discovery. They changed everything."
- "discovery" (singular) → "they" (plural) (cross)
In this question:
- Antecedent: "a detailed manuscript" (singular)
- Correct pronoun: "it" (singular)
- "In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript... in 1993, it was added to UNESCO's register."
The pronoun "it" correctly refers back to the singular noun "manuscript" from the previous sentence.
they were
✗ Incorrect
- "They" is a plural pronoun
- But "manuscript" is singular
- There's no plural noun in the first sentence for "they" to refer to
- This creates a number disagreement error
some were
✗ Incorrect
- "Some" is also plural and vague
- The first sentence mentions only one manuscript, not multiple things
- There's no logical plural antecedent for "some" to refer to
- This creates both a number disagreement and a clarity problem
this was
✗ Incorrect
- While "this" is technically singular, it's not the best choice here
- "This" is typically used to refer to broader ideas or situations mentioned previously
- When referring back to a specific object (like a manuscript) mentioned in the previous sentence, "it" is the standard, more precise pronoun
- "It" creates a clearer, more direct reference to the manuscript
it was
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.