prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia. Over two centuries later,...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia. Over two centuries later, in 1993, ______ added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register as a document of global historical significance.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

they were

B

some were

C

this was

D

it was

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • In 1776,
    • Thomas Jefferson
      • drafted a detailed manuscript
        • outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia.
  • Over two centuries later,
    • in 1993,
      • [?]
        • added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register
          • as a document of global historical significance.
  • Where [?] = they were / some were / this was / it was

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start by reading the first sentence:

'In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript outlining his vision for religious freedom in Virginia.'

So we have:

  • Thomas Jefferson wrote a manuscript in 1776
  • This manuscript was about religious freedom in Virginia

Now the second sentence begins:

'Over two centuries later, in 1993...'

  • 'Over two centuries later' means about 200+ years after 1776
  • So this is jumping forward to 1993

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • A: they were
  • B: some were
  • C: this was
  • D: it was

So we're deciding which pronoun works here. To understand what pronoun fits, let's read the rest of the sentence:

'______ added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register as a document of global historical significance.'

Now let's understand what this is telling us:

  • Something was added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 1993
  • It was recognized as historically significant

What do we notice?

The second sentence is talking about what happened to Jefferson's manuscript:

  • The first sentence tells us: Jefferson drafted "a detailed manuscript"
  • The second sentence tells us: this manuscript was added to a UNESCO register in 1993

We need a pronoun that refers back to "a detailed manuscript":

  • "Manuscript" is singular
  • We need a singular pronoun to match
  • "It" is the correct pronoun for referring to a singular object (the manuscript)

So the correct answer is D: it was.




GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Pronouns Must Agree with What They Refer To

When you use a pronoun, it must match its antecedent (the noun it refers back to) in number—singular or plural. This is especially important when the pronoun and antecedent are in different sentences.

The pattern:

  • Singular antecedentsingular pronoun
    • "The scientist made a discovery. It changed everything."
    • "discovery" (singular) → "it" (singular) (tick mark)
  • Plural antecedentplural pronoun
    • "The scientists made discoveries. They changed everything."
    • "discoveries" (plural) → "they" (plural) (tick mark)

What doesn't work:

  • Singular antecedentplural pronoun (cross)
    • "The scientist made a discovery. They changed everything."
    • "discovery" (singular) → "they" (plural) (cross)

In this question:

  • Antecedent: "a detailed manuscript" (singular)
  • Correct pronoun: "it" (singular)
  • "In 1776, Thomas Jefferson drafted a detailed manuscript... in 1993, it was added to UNESCO's register."

The pronoun "it" correctly refers back to the singular noun "manuscript" from the previous sentence.

Answer Choices Explained
A

they were

✗ Incorrect

  • "They" is a plural pronoun
  • But "manuscript" is singular
  • There's no plural noun in the first sentence for "they" to refer to
  • This creates a number disagreement error
B

some were

✗ Incorrect

  • "Some" is also plural and vague
  • The first sentence mentions only one manuscript, not multiple things
  • There's no logical plural antecedent for "some" to refer to
  • This creates both a number disagreement and a clarity problem
C

this was

✗ Incorrect

  • While "this" is technically singular, it's not the best choice here
  • "This" is typically used to refer to broader ideas or situations mentioned previously
  • When referring back to a specific object (like a manuscript) mentioned in the previous sentence, "it" is the standard, more precise pronoun
  • "It" creates a clearer, more direct reference to the manuscript
D

it was

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.