In 1903, environmentalist John Muir guided President Theodore Roosevelt on a scenic, sprawling trip through California's Yosemite Valley. Upon returni...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 1903, environmentalist John Muir guided President Theodore Roosevelt on a scenic, sprawling trip through California's Yosemite Valley. Upon returning from the three-day excursion, Roosevelt ________ to conserve the nation's wilderness areas, a vow he upheld for his remaining six years in office.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
is vowing
vowed
will vow
vows
Sentence Structure
- In 1903,
- environmentalist John Muir
- guided President Theodore Roosevelt
- on a scenic, sprawling trip
- through California's Yosemite Valley.
- on a scenic, sprawling trip
- guided President Theodore Roosevelt
- Upon returning from the three-day excursion,
- Roosevelt [?]
- to conserve the nation's wilderness areas,
- a vow
- he upheld
- for his remaining six years in office.
- he upheld
- a vow
- to conserve the nation's wilderness areas,
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
The first sentence tells us:
- In 1903, John Muir (an environmentalist)
- guided President Roosevelt on a trip through Yosemite Valley.
This establishes we're talking about historical events from 1903.
The second sentence continues the story:
- "Upon returning from the three-day excursion"
- So after they got back from this trip
Now here's where we need to fill in the blank:
- "Roosevelt ______ to conserve the nation's wilderness areas"
Let's look at our choices:
- A. is vowing (present progressive - happening now)
- B. vowed (past tense)
- C. will vow (future tense)
- D. vows (present tense)
What do we know so far?
- The passage starts with "In 1903" - a specific time in the past
- The first sentence uses "guided" - past tense
- We're reading about what Roosevelt did after returning from a historical trip
So we need past tense to match this historical narrative: vowed is correct.
Now let's read the rest to see the complete picture:
- "a vow he upheld for his remaining six years in office"
- This confirms Roosevelt already kept this promise during the rest of his presidency
- "upheld" is also past tense
- This all happened in the past - it's history we're recounting
What do we notice about the structure here?
- The entire passage is a historical narrative set in 1903
- All the verbs describing these events are in past tense:
- "guided" (what Muir did)
- "upheld" (what Roosevelt did with the vow)
- The blank describes what Roosevelt did upon returning - another past action
The correct answer is B. vowed because this is a historical event that happened in 1903, and it needs to match the past tense established throughout the passage.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Maintaining Verb Tense Consistency in Narratives
When you're writing about events, all verbs describing actions within the same time frame should use the same tense. Time markers and other verbs in the passage help you identify what tense to use.
For past narratives (like historical events):
- Time marker present: "In 1903" signals we're in the past
- Other verbs: "guided" (past), "upheld" (past)
- Therefore: Any verb describing actions in this same time period → past tense
- In this question: "vowed" correctly matches the past time frame
The pattern to follow:
- Look for time markers (dates, "yesterday," "last year," etc.)
- Notice what tense the other verbs use
- Check that events follow a logical sequence
- Make sure your verb matches the established time frame
Why this matters:
- "Roosevelt vowed" (1903) → "he upheld" (for six years after) = Logical past sequence ✓
- "Roosevelt will vow" (future) → "he upheld" (past) = Illogical timeline ✗
In this question, the clear past markers ("In 1903," "guided," "upheld") and the completed time reference ("his remaining six years in office") all signal that we're recounting finished historical events, so past tense is required throughout.
is vowing
- This is present progressive tense, which indicates an action happening right now
- But the passage is about events from 1903, not current events
- Creates a jarring tense mismatch with "In 1903," "guided," and "upheld"
- Makes no logical sense in a historical narrative
vowed
Correct as explained in the solution above.
will vow
- This is future tense, suggesting Roosevelt will make this promise at some future time
- But the passage already tells us he "upheld" this vow for six years
- You can't uphold something in the past that you'll promise to do in the future
- Violates the logical sequence of events
vows
- This is simple present tense, used for general truths or habitual actions
- Doesn't fit with the specific historical event being described
- Clashes with the past tense frame established by "In 1903," "guided," and "upheld"
- Makes the sentence sound like it's stating a general fact rather than narrating a historical event