prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

In 1922, Howard Carter's groundbreaking discovery transformed the field of Egyptology. His meticulous documentation of artifacts in the burial chamber...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

In 1922, Howard Carter's groundbreaking discovery transformed the field of Egyptology. His meticulous documentation of artifacts in the burial chamber, an unprecedented collection containing over 5,000 objects of extraordinary craftsmanship (many of which had remained sealed for three millennia), _____ essential to establishing modern protocols for archaeological preservation.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

was

B

were

C

have been

D

are

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • In 1922,
    • Howard Carter's groundbreaking discovery transformed the field of Egyptology.
  • His meticulous documentation of artifacts in the burial chamber,
    • an unprecedented collection
      • containing over 5,000 objects
        • of extraordinary craftsmanship
          • (many of which had remained
            • sealed for three millennia),
    • [was/were/have been/are] essential to establishing modern protocols
      • for archaeological preservation.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start reading from the beginning:

The first sentence tells us:

  • In 1922, Howard Carter's groundbreaking discovery transformed the field of Egyptology.
    • This sets up the historical context - we're talking about something that happened in 1922
    • Carter made an important discovery that changed Egyptology

Now the second sentence begins:

  • 'His meticulous documentation of artifacts in the burial chamber'
    • 'His' refers back to Carter
    • He carefully documented (recorded/catalogued) artifacts
    • These artifacts were in the burial chamber

Then we get additional descriptive information:

  • 'an unprecedented collection containing over 5,000 objects of extraordinary craftsmanship'
    • This describes what was in the burial chamber - an unprecedented collection
    • 'unprecedented' means never seen before
    • The collection contained over 5,000 objects
    • These objects showed extraordinary craftsmanship

The parenthetical adds even more detail:

  • '(many of which had remained sealed for three millennia)'
    • Many of these objects had been sealed away for three thousand years

Now here's where we need to fill in the blank:

  • 'His meticulous documentation _____ essential to establishing modern protocols'

Let's look at our choices:

  • The choices are asking us to pick between:
    • was (singular, past)
    • were (plural, past)
    • have been (present perfect)
    • are (present)

What do we need? Let's trace back to find the subject:

  • The sentence is telling us that "His meticulous documentation" did something
  • The core subject is "documentation"
    • "of artifacts in the burial chamber" is a prepositional phrase that describes which documentation
    • "an unprecedented collection..." is additional descriptive information about what was in the chamber
    • But these don't change the subject itself
  • "Documentation" is singular - it's one thing (his documentation)
  • For tense, we're talking about 1922 - this is a historical event
    • The first sentence uses "transformed" (past tense)
    • We're discussing what happened back then

So we need: was - singular to match "documentation," and past tense to match the 1922 context.

The complete meaning is:

  • Carter's careful documentation of these 5,000+ objects (that had been sealed for 3,000 years) was essential to establishing modern protocols for how archaeologists preserve artifacts.

GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Finding the True Subject When Phrases Come Between Subject and Verb

When a sentence has descriptive phrases between the subject and the verb, you need to identify the core subject to make the verb agree properly. Here's the pattern:

The Setup:

  • Subject + [descriptive phrases] + Verb

The Rule:

  • The verb must agree with the core subject, not with nouns in the intervening phrases
  • Prepositional phrases (like "of artifacts") don't change the subject
  • Descriptive phrases (called appositives in grammar terms) that add information don't change the subject

Examples:

  1. With prepositional phrase:
    • The box of chocolates is on the table.
    • Subject: "box" (singular)
    • "of chocolates" is a prepositional phrase
    • Verb: "is" (singular) matches "box"
  2. With descriptive phrase:
    • The director, along with all the actors, was present at the premiere.
    • Subject: "director" (singular)
    • "along with all the actors" is a descriptive phrase
    • Verb: "was" (singular) matches "director"

In our question:

  • Subject: "His meticulous documentation" (singular)
  • Intervening phrases:
    • "of artifacts in the burial chamber" (prepositional phrase)
    • "an unprecedented collection containing over 5,000 objects..." (descriptive phrase)
  • Verb needed: "was" (singular) to match "documentation"
  • Plus past tense to match the 1922 historical context

The key is to mentally strip away the descriptive layers and identify: What is the core noun doing the action? That's your subject, and your verb must agree with it.

Answer Choices Explained
A

was

✓ Correct

  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
B

were

✗ Incorrect

  • This is a plural verb, but the subject "documentation" is singular
  • Creates a subject-verb agreement error
  • You might be tempted by this because there are plural nouns nearby ("artifacts," "objects"), but those are in descriptive phrases, not the main subject
C

have been

✗ Incorrect

  • This is present perfect tense, which suggests something that started in the past and continues to the present
  • But we're discussing a specific historical event from 1922 as a completed past action
  • Inconsistent with the simple past tense "transformed" used in the first sentence
  • The passage treats this as historical fact, not ongoing action
D

are

✗ Incorrect

  • This is present tense, but we're talking about events from 1922
  • The historical context (1922) and the past tense verb "transformed" establish that we're discussing the past
  • Present tense doesn't fit this historical timeline
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.