In 1929, Edwin Herbert Land invented a polarizing filter that was featured in a number of products, from sunglasses to...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 1929, Edwin Herbert Land invented a polarizing filter that was featured in a number of products, from sunglasses to 3D movies. A decade later, Land ________ his technology to invent the world's first instant camera, the Polaroid Land camera.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
used
to have used
to use
using
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- In 1929,
- Edwin Herbert Land invented a polarizing filter
- that was featured in a number of products,
- from sunglasses to 3D movies.
- that was featured in a number of products,
- A decade later,
- Land [?] his technology
- to invent the world's first instant camera,
- the Polaroid Land camera.
- to invent the world's first instant camera,
Understanding the Meaning
The first sentence gives us background:
- 'In 1929, Edwin Herbert Land invented a polarizing filter'
- This tells us who (Edwin Herbert Land) and what he did (invented a special filter)
- 'that was featured in a number of products, from sunglasses to 3D movies'
- The filter was used in various products
- We get examples: sunglasses and 3D movies
Now the second sentence moves forward in time:
- 'A decade later'
- About ten years after 1929 - so around 1939
- 'Land ______ his technology'
- This is where we have the blank
- Land did something with his polarizing filter technology
Let's look at our choices. We need to fill in what Land did:
- used
- to have used
- to use
- using
Here's what we notice about the structure:
- 'Land' is the subject of the sentence
- We need to say what action Land took
- Every sentence needs a main verb - the action word that tells us what happened
- This verb needs to be in a form that shows when it happened (past, present, or future)
- Looking at our choices:
- "used" - this is a complete verb form (simple past tense)
- "to have used" - this is an infinitive form (to + verb)
- "to use" - this is also an infinitive form
- "using" - this is a participle form (verb + -ing)
- The key point: Infinitives (to + verb) and participles without helping verbs cannot serve as the main verb of a sentence
- They're incomplete verb forms
- They need other words around them to work
So we need: used - the simple past tense form that serves as the main verb.
The sentence reads: "A decade later, Land used his technology to invent the world's first instant camera, the Polaroid Land camera."
Let's verify this makes sense:
- "used" is the main action - what Land did with his technology
- "to invent" shows the PURPOSE - why he used it
- The sentence is complete and grammatically correct
Grammar Concept Applied
Finite Verbs as Main Verbs
Every complete sentence must have a finite verb - a verb form that shows tense (when the action happened) and can stand as the main action of the sentence. Infinitives and participles are non-finite forms (called this in grammar terms) that cannot serve as main verbs by themselves.
Finite verb forms (CAN be main verbs):
- Simple present: Land uses his technology
- Simple past: Land used his technology
- Future: Land will use his technology
Non-finite forms (CANNOT be main verbs alone):
- Infinitive: to use → needs a finite verb first ("Land wanted to use...")
- Participle: using → needs a helping verb ("Land was using...")
How this applies to our question:
- Subject: Land
- Needs: A finite verb showing past tense (historical context)
- "Used" = finite verb (simple past)
- "To have used" = infinitive
- "To use" = infinitive
- "Using" = participle without helping verb
The sentence structure is:
- Main action: Land used his technology (finite verb)
- Purpose: to invent the world's first instant camera (infinitive showing why)
used
to have used
(to have used):
✗ Incorrect
- This is an infinitive form (to + verb)
- Infinitives cannot serve as the main verb of a sentence
- Would create: "A decade later, Land to have used his technology..." - this is a sentence fragment, not a complete sentence
- Grammatically incomplete
to use
(to use):
✗ Incorrect
- This is also an infinitive form
- Cannot serve as the main verb
- Would create: "A decade later, Land to use his technology..." - another fragment
- Would need a finite verb before it, like "Land wanted to use" or "Land decided to use"
using
(using):
✗ Incorrect
- This is a participle form (verb + -ing)
- Without a helping verb like "was" or "had been," it cannot serve as the main verb
- Would create: "A decade later, Land using his technology..." - this is incomplete
- Could work as "Land was using..." but not "Land using..." alone