In 1994, almost 200 years after the death of Wang Zhenyi, the International Astronomical _______ the contributions of the barrier-breaking...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 1994, almost 200 years after the death of Wang Zhenyi, the International Astronomical _______ the contributions of the barrier-breaking 18th-century astronomer and author of 'Dispute of the Procession of the Equinoxes,' naming a crater on Venus after her.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Union would finally acknowledge
Union to finally acknowledge
Union, having finally acknowledged
Union, finally acknowledging
Sentence Structure
- In 1994,
- almost 200 years after the death of Wang Zhenyi,
- the International Astronomical Union [?]
- the contributions of the barrier-breaking 18th-century astronomer
- and author of 'Dispute of the Procession of the Equinoxes,'
- the contributions of the barrier-breaking 18th-century astronomer
- naming a crater on Venus after her.
- the International Astronomical Union [?]
- almost 200 years after the death of Wang Zhenyi,
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning and understand what this sentence is telling us:
The sentence opens with time context:
- 'In 1994'
- Sets when this event happened
- 'almost 200 years after the death of Wang Zhenyi'
- Adds more time context - emphasizing how long after her death this was
Then we get the subject:
- 'the International Astronomical Union'
- This is who did something in 1994
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices to see what we're deciding:
- A: would finally acknowledge (a complete verb)
- B: to finally acknowledge (an infinitive - "to" + verb)
- C: having finally acknowledged (a form ending in -ing with "having")
- D: finally acknowledging (a form ending in -ing)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- 'the contributions of the barrier-breaking 18th-century astronomer and author of 'Dispute of the Procession of the Equinoxes,'
- This is what the Union did something with - they did something about her contributions
- The phrase gives us details about Wang Zhenyi - she broke barriers, wrote this important work
- 'naming a crater on Venus after her'
- This tells us HOW they recognized her contributions
- They named a crater after her
So the complete picture is:
- In 1994, the International Astronomical Union recognized Wang Zhenyi's contributions by naming a Venus crater after her - nearly 200 years after her death.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have a subject: 'the International Astronomical Union'
- This subject needs a verb - it needs to DO something
- The phrase 'naming a crater on Venus after her' is describing or providing details about HOW they recognized her
- But it's not the main action itself
- It's additional information about the manner of recognition
- So we need a complete verb that can tell us what the Union DID
- Not just a verb-like form, but an actual verb that can serve as the main action
Looking at our choices with this understanding:
- Only Choice A 'would finally acknowledge' gives us a complete verb
- 'Would acknowledge' is a full verb phrase that can serve as the main action
- The other choices are verb-like forms (infinitives or -ing forms) that can't be the main verb on their own
So we need Choice A: 'would finally acknowledge' - this provides the main verb the sentence requires.
Grammar Concept Applied
Complete Sentences Need Main Verbs (Not Just Verb-Like Forms)
Every complete sentence needs a subject and a main verb - a verb form that can actually perform the action of the sentence. Some verb forms that look like verbs cannot function as the main verb:
Main verb forms (CAN be the main verb):
- Simple forms: acknowledge, acknowledged
- With helping verbs (called modals): would acknowledge, can acknowledge, should acknowledge
- Progressive with "be": is acknowledging, was acknowledging
Verb-like forms (CANNOT be the main verb alone):
- Infinitives: to acknowledge
- Participles: acknowledging, having acknowledged
Pattern in this question:
- Subject: the International Astronomical Union
- Needs: main verb - "would finally acknowledge" ✓
- Not: infinitive - "to finally acknowledge" ✗
- Not: participles - "having finally acknowledged" or "finally acknowledging" ✗
The sentence structure is: [Subject] + [Main Verb] + [Object], with "naming a crater..." providing additional descriptive information about how the acknowledgment happened.
Union would finally acknowledge
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
Union to finally acknowledge
✗ Incorrect
"Union to finally acknowledge"
- "To finally acknowledge" is an infinitive form (to + verb)
- Infinitives cannot serve as the main verb of a sentence
- This would leave the sentence without a main verb, creating a fragment
- The subject "Union" would have no action to perform
Union, having finally acknowledged
✗ Incorrect
"Union, having finally acknowledged"
- "Having finally acknowledged" is a perfect participle form
- Participles cannot serve as the main verb on their own
- This would create a sentence fragment with no main verb
- Additionally, "having acknowledged" suggests the acknowledgment happened before some other past action, but there's no such subsequent action in this sentence
Union, finally acknowledging
✗ Incorrect
"Union, finally acknowledging"
- "Finally acknowledging" is a present participle form
- Like other participles, it cannot be the main verb on its own
- This would turn the entire sentence into just one long descriptive phrase with no main action
- The subject "Union" would have no complete verb