In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old. These are...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old. These are some of the oldest ________ of pottery ever found.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
pieces:
pieces,
pieces
pieces—
Sentence Structure
Sentence 1:
- In 2009,
- researchers
- determined
- that pottery fragments from a cave in China
- were close to 18,000 years old.
- that pottery fragments from a cave in China
- determined
Sentence 2:
- These
- are some of the oldest pieces [?] of pottery ever found.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's read from the beginning to understand what's happening:
The first sentence tells us:
- In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old.
- So we have a discovery of very ancient pottery fragments
Now the second sentence:
- "These are some of the oldest"
- "These" refers back to those pottery fragments
- They're among the oldest of something
This is where we have the blank:
- "pieces [?] of pottery ever found"
Let's look at the choices:
- A adds a colon after "pieces"
- B adds a comma after "pieces"
- C has no punctuation after "pieces"
- D adds a dash after "pieces"
To see what works here, let's understand what this phrase is actually saying!
The complete phrase is: "the oldest pieces of pottery ever found"
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "pieces of pottery" works as a single unit
- "of pottery" tells us what kind of pieces we're talking about
- It answers the question: pieces of what?
- This "of pottery" part is essential to the meaning
- Without it, we'd just have "pieces" - but pieces of what?
- We NEED "of pottery" to know what these pieces are
- When describing information is essential (not extra), it flows directly without punctuation
- "of pottery" isn't bonus information we're adding
- It's a necessary part of identifying what the pieces are
So we need: no punctuation between "pieces" and "of pottery" - they flow together as one complete phrase.
The correct answer is C.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Essential Prepositional Phrases: When NOT to Use Punctuation
When you have a noun followed by a prepositional phrase (a phrase starting with words like "of," "in," "on," "with") that defines or specifies that noun, no punctuation separates them. The prepositional phrase is essential to the meaning:
Pattern: Noun + of + specifying information (no punctuation between them)
Examples:
- "a cup of coffee" (not: a cup, of coffee)
- "the cost of living" (not: the cost, of living)
- "pieces of pottery" (not: pieces, of pottery)
In our question:
- Noun: pieces
- Essential prepositional phrase: of pottery
- Why it's essential: Without "of pottery," we don't know what kind of pieces - the phrase is necessary to complete the meaning
- Result: No punctuation between them - they flow together as one complete noun phrase
This is different from extra, non-essential information (called non-restrictive information in grammar terms), which DOES get set off by commas or dashes. For example: "The fragments, discovered in 2009, were very old." Here, "discovered in 2009" is bonus information that could be removed, so it gets commas.
pieces:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration that follows
- Here, "of pottery ever found" isn't something being introduced or listed; it's the continuation of the noun phrase that started with "pieces"
- The colon creates an incorrect break in what should be a continuous phrase
pieces,
✗ Incorrect
- A comma here would separate "pieces" from "of pottery"
- But "of pottery" is essential information - we need it to know what kind of pieces we're discussing
- The comma incorrectly suggests that "of pottery" is extra, optional information when it's actually necessary to complete the meaning
pieces
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
pieces—
✗ Incorrect
- A dash is used to set off additional information or create emphasis for something being added
- Like the comma, this would incorrectly treat "of pottery" as supplementary information
- But "of pottery" isn't extra - it's an essential part of the noun phrase that identifies what the pieces are