prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old. These are...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old. These are some of the oldest ________ of pottery ever found.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

pieces:

B

pieces,

C

pieces

D

pieces—

Solution

Sentence Structure

Sentence 1:

  • In 2009,
  • researchers
    • determined
      • that pottery fragments from a cave in China
        • were close to 18,000 years old.

Sentence 2:

  • These
    • are some of the oldest pieces [?] of pottery ever found.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's read from the beginning to understand what's happening:

The first sentence tells us:

  • In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old.
    • So we have a discovery of very ancient pottery fragments

Now the second sentence:

  • "These are some of the oldest"
    • "These" refers back to those pottery fragments
    • They're among the oldest of something

This is where we have the blank:

  • "pieces [?] of pottery ever found"

Let's look at the choices:

  • A adds a colon after "pieces"
  • B adds a comma after "pieces"
  • C has no punctuation after "pieces"
  • D adds a dash after "pieces"

To see what works here, let's understand what this phrase is actually saying!

The complete phrase is: "the oldest pieces of pottery ever found"

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • "pieces of pottery" works as a single unit
    • "of pottery" tells us what kind of pieces we're talking about
    • It answers the question: pieces of what?
  • This "of pottery" part is essential to the meaning
    • Without it, we'd just have "pieces" - but pieces of what?
    • We NEED "of pottery" to know what these pieces are
  • When describing information is essential (not extra), it flows directly without punctuation
    • "of pottery" isn't bonus information we're adding
    • It's a necessary part of identifying what the pieces are

So we need: no punctuation between "pieces" and "of pottery" - they flow together as one complete phrase.

The correct answer is C.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Essential Prepositional Phrases: When NOT to Use Punctuation

When you have a noun followed by a prepositional phrase (a phrase starting with words like "of," "in," "on," "with") that defines or specifies that noun, no punctuation separates them. The prepositional phrase is essential to the meaning:

Pattern: Noun + of + specifying information (no punctuation between them)

Examples:

  • "a cup of coffee" (not: a cup, of coffee)
  • "the cost of living" (not: the cost, of living)
  • "pieces of pottery" (not: pieces, of pottery)

In our question:

  • Noun: pieces
  • Essential prepositional phrase: of pottery
  • Why it's essential: Without "of pottery," we don't know what kind of pieces - the phrase is necessary to complete the meaning
  • Result: No punctuation between them - they flow together as one complete noun phrase

This is different from extra, non-essential information (called non-restrictive information in grammar terms), which DOES get set off by commas or dashes. For example: "The fragments, discovered in 2009, were very old." Here, "discovered in 2009" is bonus information that could be removed, so it gets commas.

Answer Choices Explained
A

pieces:

✗ Incorrect

  • A colon is used to introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration that follows
  • Here, "of pottery ever found" isn't something being introduced or listed; it's the continuation of the noun phrase that started with "pieces"
  • The colon creates an incorrect break in what should be a continuous phrase
B

pieces,

✗ Incorrect

  • A comma here would separate "pieces" from "of pottery"
  • But "of pottery" is essential information - we need it to know what kind of pieces we're discussing
  • The comma incorrectly suggests that "of pottery" is extra, optional information when it's actually necessary to complete the meaning
C

pieces

✓ Correct

  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
D

pieces—

✗ Incorrect

  • A dash is used to set off additional information or create emphasis for something being added
  • Like the comma, this would incorrectly treat "of pottery" as supplementary information
  • But "of pottery" isn't extra - it's an essential part of the noun phrase that identifies what the pieces are
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.