In 2018, the innovative works of Congolese sculptor and architect Bodys Isek ______ were featured in City Dreams, a solo...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 2018, the innovative works of Congolese sculptor and architect Bodys Isek ______ were featured in City Dreams, a solo exhibition at New York's Museum of Modern Art.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
In 2018, the innovative works of Congolese sculptor and architect Bodys Isek Kingelez [?] were featured in City Dreams, a solo exhibition at New York's Museum of Modern Art.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning: In 2018, the innovative works of Congolese sculptor and architect Bodys Isek Kingelez...
So we're being told about certain works - specifically, the innovative works made by Bodys Isek Kingelez, who was a Congolese sculptor and architect.
Now we've reached the blank. This is where we need to decide what punctuation, if any, should come after "Kingelez." Let's look at our choices:
- A semicolon (;)
- A comma (,)
- No punctuation
- A colon (:)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
...were featured in City Dreams, a solo exhibition at New York's Museum of Modern Art.
So the sentence is telling us what happened to these works - they were featured in an exhibition called City Dreams at the Museum of Modern Art.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "The innovative works of Bodys Isek Kingelez" = the subject
- This is what the sentence is about
- "were featured in City Dreams..." = the verb and where it happened
- This tells us what happened to those works
The subject flows naturally into the verb - they're the two essential parts that need to connect smoothly. There's nothing between them that needs to be separated or set off with punctuation.
So we need no punctuation after "Kingelez." The answer is C.
Grammar Concept Applied
Connecting Subjects to Verbs Without Punctuation
One of the fundamental principles in English sentence structure is that the subject (what the sentence is about) flows directly into the verb (what's happening) without punctuation between them:
Pattern:
- Subject + Verb (no punctuation between)
Examples:
- Incorrect: The students, arrived late.
Correct: The students arrived late. - Incorrect: My favorite book by that author; won several awards.
Correct: My favorite book by that author won several awards. - Incorrect: The new policies regarding remote work: take effect next month.
Correct: The new policies regarding remote work take effect next month.
In this question:
- Subject: "The innovative works of Congolese sculptor and architect Bodys Isek Kingelez"
- Verb: "were featured"
- These must connect directly without any punctuation interrupting their natural relationship
Note: This rule applies even when the subject is long or contains descriptive phrases (called modifying phrases in grammar terms). The length doesn't change the rule - subject and verb still connect without punctuation.
- A semicolon separates two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as sentences
- "The innovative works of Congolese sculptor and architect Bodys Isek Kingelez" is not a complete thought - it's just a subject with no verb
- This would create a fragment before the semicolon, which is incorrect
- A comma here would separate the subject from its verb
- In Standard English, we don't put a comma between a subject and its verb unless there's an intervening element (like a descriptive clause) that needs to be set off
- This disrupts the natural flow from what we're talking about (the works) to what happened to them (were featured)
Correct as explained in the solution above.
- A colon introduces something that follows - typically a list, an explanation, or an elaboration
- "were featured in City Dreams" doesn't explain or elaborate on the works; it tells us the main action that happened to them
- A colon would incorrectly suggest that what follows is defining or listing something, when it's actually the main action of the sentence