In 2019, archaeologists excavating in Guatemala uncovered extensive evidence of a previously unknown Maya settlement dating to 600 CE. A...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In 2019, archaeologists excavating in Guatemala uncovered extensive evidence of a previously unknown Maya settlement dating to 600 CE. A densely populated urban center with elaborate stone temples and sophisticated agricultural systems, _____
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
the site demonstrated the advanced engineering capabilities of its inhabitants.
archaeologists determined that it demonstrated advanced engineering capabilities.
demonstrating advanced engineering capabilities was evident in the site.
when researchers studied the site, they found evidence of advanced engineering capabilities.
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
• In 2019,
• archaeologists excavating in Guatemala
• uncovered extensive evidence
• of a previously unknown Maya settlement
• dating to 600 CE.
• A densely populated urban center
• with elaborate stone temples
• and sophisticated agricultural systems,
• [?] demonstrated the advanced engineering capabilities
• of its inhabitants.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start with the first sentence:
In 2019,
archaeologists excavating in Guatemala
uncovered extensive evidence
of a previously unknown Maya settlement
dating to 600 CE.
This tells us about a discovery:
- Archaeologists in Guatemala found evidence
- They discovered a Maya settlement
- This settlement was previously unknown
- It dates to 600 CE
Now the second sentence begins:
A densely populated urban center
with elaborate stone temples
and sophisticated agricultural systems,
_____
This is where we have the blank.
Let's look at the choices to see what varies:
- A. the site demonstrated...
- B. archaeologists determined...
- C. demonstrating... was evident...
- D. when researchers studied...
They're giving us completely different subjects and structures.
To see what works here, let's understand what we're reading:
'A densely populated urban center with elaborate stone temples and sophisticated agricultural systems'
- This is a descriptive phrase at the start of the sentence
- It's followed by a comma
- It's describing something - giving us characteristics
What is it describing?
- It's describing the Maya settlement from the first sentence
- It's telling us what the settlement was like
What do we notice about the structure here?
- This opening phrase is a modifier - a descriptive element
- It comes at the beginning of the sentence
- It's followed by a comma
- It needs to be followed by the thing it's describing
- The thing being described is the settlement/site itself
- The phrase "a densely populated urban center" is describing what the settlement WAS
- So the word right after the comma must BE that settlement/site
Looking at our choices again:
- A. "the site" → This IS the settlement ✓
- B. "archaeologists" → These are people, not the settlement
- C. "demonstrating" → This is a verb form, not the site itself
- D. "when researchers studied" → This is about timing/action, not the site
The correct answer is A.
The opening modifier describes the settlement, so "the site" (which refers to the settlement) must come immediately after the comma. This makes the sentence mean: "The site - which was a densely populated urban center with elaborate stone temples and sophisticated agricultural systems - demonstrated the advanced engineering capabilities of its inhabitants."
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Introductory Descriptive Phrases (Modifiers)
When a sentence begins with a descriptive phrase followed by a comma, what comes immediately after that comma must be the specific thing being described (called an introductory appositive or noun phrase modifier in grammar terms).
The Pattern:
- Descriptive phrase: A prize-winning novelist
- Must be followed by: she has published twelve books
- "she" (the novelist) comes right after the comma
- Descriptive phrase: An innovative solution to urban traffic
- Must be followed by: the new subway system has reduced congestion by 40%
- "the subway system" (the solution) comes right after the comma
Why this matters:
The descriptive phrase at the beginning tells you characteristics or qualities. Whatever those characteristics apply to must be named immediately after the comma. If you put something else there, you create a mismatch - like saying "A brilliant scientist, the experiment was groundbreaking" (incorrect - the experiment isn't the scientist!).
In this question:
- Descriptive phrase: "A densely populated urban center with elaborate stone temples and sophisticated agricultural systems"
- Must describe: the site (the settlement)
- Incorrect if followed by: archaeologists, when researchers, or demonstrating
The phrase describes the settlement's characteristics, so "the site" must come right after the comma.
the site demonstrated the advanced engineering capabilities of its inhabitants.
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
archaeologists determined that it demonstrated advanced engineering capabilities.
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a modifier error by placing "archaeologists" immediately after the opening descriptive phrase
- The opening phrase "A densely populated urban center..." describes the settlement, not the archaeologists
- This would incorrectly suggest that the archaeologists (not the settlement) were "a densely populated urban center"
demonstrating advanced engineering capabilities was evident in the site.
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a structural problem by using "demonstrating" (a verb form) instead of a noun
- The opening phrase needs to be followed by the specific noun it's describing (the site)
- Also creates an awkward, unclear construction that obscures the meaning
when researchers studied the site, they found evidence of advanced engineering capabilities.
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a modifier error by placing a time clause ("when researchers studied") after the opening phrase
- The opening phrase describes what the site WAS, not when or how it was studied
- The site itself must come immediately after the descriptive phrase, not a clause about researchers