prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

In a study of the cognitive abilities of white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus imitator), researchers neglected to control for the physical...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Information and Ideas
Inferences
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

In a study of the cognitive abilities of white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus imitator), researchers neglected to control for the physical difficulty of the tasks they used to evaluate the monkeys. The cognitive abilities of monkeys given problems requiring little dexterity, such as sliding a panel to retrieve food, were judged by the same criteria as were those of monkeys given physically demanding problems, such as unscrewing a bottle and inserting a straw. The results of the study, therefore, ______

Which choice most logically completes the text?

A

could suggest that there are differences in cognitive ability among the monkeys even though such differences may not actually exist.

B

are useful for identifying tasks that the monkeys lack the cognitive capacity to perform but not for identifying tasks that the monkeys can perform.

C

should not be taken as indicative of the cognitive abilities of any monkey species other than C. imitator.

D

reveal more about the monkeys' cognitive abilities when solving artificial problems than when solving problems encountered in the wild.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"In a study of the cognitive abilities of white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus imitator), researchers neglected to control for the physical difficulty of the tasks they used to evaluate the monkeys."
  • What it says: Study = cognitive abilities, but researchers didn't control for physical difficulty of tasks.
  • What it does: Introduces a methodological flaw in the research design.
  • What it is: Problem setup
"The cognitive abilities of monkeys given problems requiring little dexterity, such as sliding a panel to retrieve food, were judged by the same criteria as were those of monkeys given physically demanding problems, such as unscrewing a bottle and inserting a straw."
  • What it says: Easy tasks (sliding panel) + hard tasks (unscrewing bottle/straw) = judged by same standards.
  • What it does: Explains the specific nature of the methodological flaw with concrete examples.
  • What it is: Evidence/elaboration
"The results of the study, therefore, ______"
  • What it says: [MISSING CONCLUSION].
  • What it does: Sets up the logical consequence of the flawed methodology.
  • What it is: Missing logical conclusion

Part B: Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: A study of monkey cognitive abilities failed to control for the physical difficulty of tasks, creating a methodological problem that affects the validity of the results.

Argument Flow: The passage presents a research study, identifies a specific methodological flaw (not controlling for physical task difficulty), provides examples of easy versus difficult tasks that were judged equally, and sets up the logical consequence of this flawed approach.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The key issue is that cognitive ability and physical dexterity are different things
  • When researchers don't control for physical difficulty, monkeys might appear to have different cognitive abilities when the real difference is in their physical skills or the physical demands of their tasks
  • The right answer should explain that the results might show apparent cognitive differences that don't actually reflect real differences in cognitive ability
Answer Choices Explained
A

could suggest that there are differences in cognitive ability among the monkeys even though such differences may not actually exist.

✓ Correct

  • This perfectly captures the logical consequence of the methodological flaw
  • When physical task difficulty isn't controlled, performance differences might reflect physical challenges rather than cognitive differences
B

are useful for identifying tasks that the monkeys lack the cognitive capacity to perform but not for identifying tasks that the monkeys can perform.

✗ Incorrect

  • Claims the results are useful for identifying what monkeys can't do but not what they can do
  • This doesn't logically follow from the setup about uncontrolled physical difficulty
C

should not be taken as indicative of the cognitive abilities of any monkey species other than C. imitator.

✗ Incorrect

  • Focuses on generalizability to other species
  • The passage's concern is about the methodology within this study, not about applying results to other species
D

reveal more about the monkeys' cognitive abilities when solving artificial problems than when solving problems encountered in the wild.

✗ Incorrect

  • Contrasts artificial versus wild problems
  • The passage doesn't distinguish between artificial and natural tasks - the real issue is physical difficulty, not the artificial nature of the tasks
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.