In December 2004, the Huygens probe descended through Titan's dense ______ detached from the Cassini orbiter three weeks earlier, the...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In December 2004, the Huygens probe descended through Titan's dense ______ detached from the Cassini orbiter three weeks earlier, the probe transmitted detailed data that transformed scientists' understanding of Saturn's largest moon.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
atmosphere. Having
atmosphere, having
atmosphere and having
atmosphere having
Sentence Structure
- In December 2004,
- the Huygens probe
- descended through Titan's dense atmosphere
- [?] detached from the Cassini orbiter
- three weeks earlier,
- [?] detached from the Cassini orbiter
- descended through Titan's dense atmosphere
- the probe
- transmitted detailed data
- that transformed scientists' understanding of Saturn's largest moon.
- transmitted detailed data
- the Huygens probe
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading:
In December 2004,
the Huygens probe descended through Titan's dense atmosphere
This tells us:
- A space probe called Huygens
- Made a descent through the atmosphere of Titan (Saturn's largest moon)
- This happened in December 2004
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- They differ in punctuation before 'having'
- Period and capital H
- Comma and lowercase h
- 'and' with lowercase h
- No punctuation with lowercase h
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- 'detached from the Cassini orbiter three weeks earlier'
- This is background information
- The probe had separated from the larger Cassini spacecraft
- This happened three weeks before the descent
Then:
- 'the probe transmitted detailed data that transformed scientists' understanding of Saturn's largest moon'
- This is another main action
- The probe sent back data
- This data changed how scientists understood Titan
What do we notice about the structure here?
We actually have TWO complete thoughts (independent clauses):
- First: 'the Huygens probe descended through Titan's dense atmosphere'
- Subject = the probe
- Main verb = descended
- Second: 'the probe transmitted detailed data...'
- Subject = the probe
- Main verb = transmitted
Between these two complete thoughts, we have:
- 'Having detached from the Cassini orbiter three weeks earlier'
- This provides background information
- It tells us something that happened before the main events
- It's not a complete thought on its own - it's a descriptive phrase
Here's the key: Two independent clauses (complete thoughts) cannot be joined by just a comma - that creates a run-on sentence. They need a stronger separation.
The correct structure is:
- First complete thought ends with a period
- Then the background phrase 'Having detached...' introduces the second sentence
- This phrase is followed by a comma, then the second complete thought
So we need: atmosphere. Having
This creates two proper sentences:
- Sentence 1: 'In December 2004, the Huygens probe descended through Titan's dense atmosphere.'
- Sentence 2: 'Having detached from the Cassini orbiter three weeks earlier, the probe transmitted detailed data...'
Grammar Concept Applied
Separating Independent Clauses and Using Introductory Phrases
When you have two independent clauses (complete thoughts that could stand alone as sentences), you cannot join them with just a comma. You need:
- A period (or semicolon) to create separate sentences, OR
- A comma + coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, etc.)
When you use a period to create two sentences, the second sentence can begin with an introductory phrase (called a participial phrase in grammar terms) that provides background information:
Pattern:
- Independent clause 1. [Period creates sentence boundary]
- [Introductory phrase providing background], independent clause 2.
Example 1:
- The team celebrated their victory. Having trained for months, they felt the win was well-deserved.
- First complete thought: 'The team celebrated their victory'
- Period separates
- 'Having trained for months' = background information about the team
- Second complete thought: 'they felt the win was well-deserved'
Example 2:
- The detective solved the case. Having examined all the evidence carefully, she identified the culprit.
In our question:
- First complete thought: 'the Huygens probe descended through Titan's dense atmosphere'
- Period separates (Choice A)
- 'Having detached from the Cassini orbiter three weeks earlier' = background about when the probe separated
- Second complete thought: 'the probe transmitted detailed data...'
The word 'Having' signals that this action (detaching) happened before the main action (transmitting data), providing important context.
atmosphere. Having
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
atmosphere, having
✗ Incorrect
- This joins two independent clauses with only a comma
- 'The probe descended' is a complete thought and 'the probe transmitted' is another complete thought
- Two complete thoughts cannot be connected by just a comma - this creates a run-on sentence
- We need a period to properly separate these independent clauses
atmosphere and having
✗ Incorrect
- The word 'and' would make 'descended' and 'having detached' seem like parallel, coordinated actions
- But they're not the same type of grammatical element
- 'Descended' is the main verb telling what happened, while 'having detached' is background information
- This creates an illogical and ungrammatical structure
atmosphere having
✗ Incorrect
- Without any punctuation, this creates a confusing run-on
- The relationship between the parts becomes unclear
- We need punctuation to show where one complete thought ends and the next begins