In the 1950s, novel audio technologies allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing ________ relatively quiet instrument,...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
In the 1950s, novel audio technologies allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing ________ relatively quiet instrument, its full range of sound was finally audible alongside the blaring brass instruments of the time, allowing flautists like Bennie Maupin and Bobbi Humphrey to perform with other jazz greats.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
music, the flute, a
music. The flute, a
music; the flute, a
music: the flute. A
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- In the 1950s,
- novel audio technologies
- allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing music [?]
- the flute [?]
- [a/A] relatively quiet instrument,
- the flute [?]
- its full range of sound
- was finally audible alongside the blaring brass instruments of the time,
- allowing flautists like Bennie Maupin and Bobbi Humphrey
- to perform with other jazz greats.
- allowing flautists like Bennie Maupin and Bobbi Humphrey
- was finally audible alongside the blaring brass instruments of the time,
- allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing music [?]
Understanding the Meaning
The passage is telling us about a development in jazz music in the 1950s:
- 'In the 1950s, novel audio technologies allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing music...'
- New sound technology made it possible to add an instrument that couldn't be heard well before.
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- We're deciding how to punctuate after "music" (comma, period, semicolon, or colon)
- How to punctuate after "flute" (comma or period)
- Whether to capitalize "a" or use lowercase "a"
To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what it's saying!
- 'the flute, a relatively quiet instrument'
- This tells us the flute is the instrument being added
- And gives us a key detail: it's quiet
- 'its full range of sound was finally audible alongside the blaring brass instruments of the time'
- Now the flute could be heard even next to loud brass instruments
- This explains WHY the new technology mattered
- 'allowing flautists like Bennie Maupin and Bobbi Humphrey to perform with other jazz greats'
- Because the flute could now be heard, flute players could perform in jazz bands
Now let's understand what we notice about the structure here:
- The first part makes a general statement:
- "technologies allowed the addition of another instrument"
- Then "the flute" specifies WHICH instrument
- This is a perfect use for a colon - introducing a specific example that explains the general statement
- So: "...jazz and swing music: the flute"
- But we have two substantial, complete ideas:
- First idea: The flute was added to jazz music (thanks to new technology)
- Second idea: Because the flute was quiet, this technology finally made its full sound audible next to brass instruments
- Looking at the second idea:
- "A relatively quiet instrument" - this descriptive phrase sets up the explanation
- "its full range of sound was finally audible..." - this is a complete thought with its own subject and verb
- This is substantial enough to be its own sentence
So we need: music: the flute. A
- Colon after "music" to introduce the specific instrument
- Period after "flute" to complete the first sentence
- Capital "A" to start the new sentence
The correct answer is Choice D.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Colons to Introduce Specific Examples and Creating Clear Sentence Boundaries
When you make a general statement and want to specify exactly what you mean with a concrete example, a colon can introduce that specification (this is sometimes called using a colon for elaboration):
Pattern 1: General Statement : Specific Example
- "The committee selected one candidate: Maria Rodriguez."
- General: one candidate was selected
- Specific: Maria Rodriguez
- "Scientists identified the cause of the outbreak: contaminated water."
- General: the cause was identified
- Specific: contaminated water
- In our question: "...allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing music: the flute."
- General: another instrument was added
- Specific: the flute
Pattern 2: When to Separate into Multiple Sentences
When you have two complete, substantial ideas that are related but distinct, create separate sentences rather than stringing them together with commas:
- Two distinct ideas in our question:
- Idea 1: "In the 1950s, novel audio technologies allowed the addition of another instrument to jazz and swing music: the flute."
- Idea 2: "A relatively quiet instrument, its full range of sound was finally audible alongside the blaring brass instruments of the time..."
- Each idea has its own subject-verb structure and makes a complete point
- The second sentence begins with a descriptive phrase ("A relatively quiet instrument") that sets up the main clause ("its full range of sound was finally audible")
music, the flute, a
- Creates a run-on sentence with too many comma-separated phrases
- The string "music, the flute, a relatively quiet instrument, its full range of sound was finally audible" is confusing and hard to parse
- Buries the main clause ("its full range of sound was finally audible") among multiple descriptive phrases without proper structure
- Fails to show the relationship between the general statement and the specific example
music. The flute, a
- Starts a new sentence too early with just "music."
- Creates awkward structure where "The flute, a relatively quiet instrument," seems to be the subject, but then shifts to "its full range of sound" without proper connection
- The comma after "instrument" creates a fragment before the actual subject-verb combination
- Doesn't establish the explanatory relationship between the flute and the music mentioned before
music; the flute, a
- Misuses the semicolon - semicolons should connect two independent clauses
- What follows the semicolon ("the flute, a relatively quiet instrument, its full range of sound was finally audible...") is not properly structured as an independent clause
- The comma placement makes it unclear where the main subject-verb combination begins
- Creates confusion about the sentence structure
music: the flute. A
- Correct as explained in the solution above.