Like other amphibians, the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) is unable to generate its own heat, so during periods of subfreezing...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Like other amphibians, the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) is unable to generate its own heat, so during periods of subfreezing temperatures, it ________ by producing large amounts of glucose, a sugar that helps prevent damaging ice from forming inside its cells.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
had survived
survived
would survive
survives
Sentence Structure
- Like other amphibians,
- the wood frog (Rana sylvatica)
- is unable to generate its own heat,
- the wood frog (Rana sylvatica)
- so during periods of subfreezing temperatures,
- it (?)
- by producing large amounts of glucose,
- a sugar that helps prevent damaging ice
- from forming inside its cells.
- a sugar that helps prevent damaging ice
- by producing large amounts of glucose,
- it (?)
- Where (?) = had survived / survived / would survive / survives
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning:
- 'Like other amphibians, the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) is unable to generate its own heat'
- This tells us a basic biological fact about wood frogs
- They can't produce their own body heat
- Notice the verb here: 'is unable' - present tense
- This is describing a general characteristic, not a one-time event
The sentence continues:
- 'so during periods of subfreezing temperatures, it ______'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- had survived (past perfect)
- survived (simple past)
- would survive (conditional/hypothetical)
- survives (simple present)
So we're deciding which tense of 'survive' fits. To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
- 'by producing large amounts of glucose, a sugar that helps prevent damaging ice from forming inside its cells'
- This explains HOW the frog survives the cold
- It makes a type of sugar that protects its cells from ice damage
What do we notice about the whole sentence?
- The entire sentence is describing a general biological process
- Not a specific event that happened once in the past
- Not a hypothetical "what if" scenario
- But a repeated, ongoing fact about what wood frogs do
- The opening establishes this with 'is unable' (present tense)
- This signals we're talking about general characteristics
- A timeless fact about the species
- The blank describes what happens when cold temperatures occur
- This happens repeatedly - every time it gets cold
- It's part of the frog's regular biological response
For general truths and repeated actions - facts that are always true - we use simple present tense.
So we need: survives (Choice D)
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Simple Present Tense for General Truths and Facts
When describing scientific facts, general truths, or habitual actions that happen repeatedly (rather than specific one-time events), we use simple present tense. This is especially important in scientific writing:
General biological fact:
- "The wood frog is unable to generate its own heat"
- Not "was unable" - because it's always true
Habitual action that repeats:
- "During cold periods, it survives by producing glucose"
- Not "survived" or "would survive" - because this happens every time
Why this matters in this question:
The sentence begins with "is unable" (present tense), establishing that we're discussing general characteristics of wood frogs. Everything that follows must maintain this timeframe. The verb "survives" continues describing what the frog does as a regular biological process - not a one-time past event or hypothetical scenario, but a repeated, ongoing fact about the species.
Think of it like this: If you're writing "Water freezes at 32°F," you wouldn't say "Water froze at 32°F" or "Water would freeze at 32°F" - because you're stating a fact that's always true. The same principle applies here with the wood frog's survival mechanism.
had survived
Choice A
✗ Incorrect
- This is past perfect tense, which is used for something that was completed before another past action
- The sentence isn't describing a specific completed past event - it's describing a general biological ability that happens repeatedly
- Creates a tense mismatch with "is unable" (present tense) and disrupts the factual tone
survived
Choice B
✗ Incorrect
- This is simple past tense, suggesting a one-time event that happened in the past
- The sentence is describing what the frog does habitually whenever temperatures drop, not what it did once
- Creates inconsistency with the present tense "is unable" and suggests the survival happened in the past but we don't know about now
would survive
Choice C
✗ Incorrect
- This is conditional form, suggesting something hypothetical or uncertain
- The sentence is stating a definitive biological fact, not a possibility
- Creates doubt where the passage is presenting established scientific knowledge about the species
survives
Choice D
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.