Many films from the early 1900s have been lost. These losses include several films by the first wave of Black...
GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions
Many films from the early 1900s have been lost. These losses include several films by the first wave of Black women filmmakers. We know about these lost movies only from small pieces of evidence. For example, an advertisement for Jennie Louise Touissant Welcome's documentary Doing Their Bit still exists. There's a reference in a magazine to Tressie Souders's film A Woman's Error. And Maria P. Williams's The Flames of Wrath is mentioned in a letter and a newspaper article, and one image from the movie was discovered in the 1990s.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
The text identifies a complex problem, then presents examples of unsuccessful attempts to solve that problem.
The text summarizes a debate among researchers, then gives reasons for supporting one side in that debate.
The text describes a general situation, then illustrates that situation with specific examples.
The text discusses several notable individuals, then explains commonly overlooked differences between those individuals.
Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage
Part A: Passage Analysis Table
| Text from Passage | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Many films from the early 1900s have been lost. |
|
| These losses include several films by the first wave of Black women filmmakers. |
|
| We know about these lost movies only from small pieces of evidence. |
|
| For example, an advertisement for Jennie Louise Touissant Welcome's documentary Doing Their Bit still exists. |
|
| There's a reference in a magazine to Tressie Souders's film A Woman's Error. |
|
| And Maria P. Williams's The Flames of Wrath is mentioned in a letter and a newspaper article, and one image from the movie was discovered in the 1990s. |
|
Part B: Passage Architecture & Core Elements
Main Point: We know about lost films by early Black women filmmakers only through small surviving pieces of evidence.
Argument Flow: The text starts with a broad historical issue (lost early films), then focuses on one affected group (Black women filmmakers), explains how we learn about these losses (through evidence fragments), and demonstrates this with three specific examples of the types of evidence that survive.
Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely
What's being asked? The overall structure of the entire text
What type of answer do we need? A description of how the passage is organized from beginning to end
Any limiting keywords? Overall structure means we need to capture the big-picture organization, not focus on details
Step 3: Prethink the Answer
- This passage moves from general to specific
- It starts with a broad statement about lost films, narrows to Black women filmmakers specifically, explains our knowledge limitation, then gives us three concrete examples of the evidence we do have
- The right answer should recognize this general-to-specific pattern and identify that the examples serve to illustrate the broader situation described at the beginning
The text identifies a complex problem, then presents examples of unsuccessful attempts to solve that problem.
- This suggests the examples are unsuccessful attempts to solve the problem of lost films
- The examples aren't attempts to solve anything—they're just pieces of evidence that survived
The text summarizes a debate among researchers, then gives reasons for supporting one side in that debate.
- There's no debate among researchers mentioned anywhere in the passage
- The text doesn't take sides or present opposing viewpoints—it simply states facts about what evidence exists
The text describes a general situation, then illustrates that situation with specific examples.
- This perfectly matches our analysis: general situation (films lost, particularly Black women's films, known only through fragments) followed by specific examples (Welcome's ad, Souders's magazine reference, Williams's multiple pieces of evidence)
The text discusses several notable individuals, then explains commonly overlooked differences between those individuals.
- While the text mentions three individual filmmakers, it doesn't explain differences between them
- The focus is on what evidence survives for each, not on contrasting the filmmakers themselves