prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Maria Santos and David Chang represent investigative journalists who ______ institutional secrecy. Their meticulous research and source verification s...

GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions

Source: Prism
Craft and Structure
Words in Context
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Maria Santos and David Chang represent investigative journalists who ______ institutional secrecy. Their meticulous research and source verification systematically reveals corruption and misconduct that corporate and government entities attempt to conceal.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?

A

exposing

B

preventing

C

ignoring

D

anticipating

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from Passage Analysis
'Maria Santos and David Chang represent investigative journalists who'
  • What it says: M.S. & D.C. = investigative journalists who [something]
  • What it does: Introduces two journalists and sets up description
  • What it is: Character introduction + setup
[MISSING WORD/PHRASE]
  • What it is: Missing logical connector describing their relationship to institutional secrecy
'institutional secrecy.'
  • What it says: institutional secrecy = target/subject
  • What it does: Completes the description of what these journalists do
  • What it is: Object of their action
'Their meticulous research and source verification systematically reveals corruption and misconduct that corporate and government entities attempt to conceal.'
  • What it says: their research + verification reveals corruption/misconduct that corps/gov try to hide
  • What it does: Explains how these journalists operate and what they uncover
  • What it is: Evidence/explanation of their methods and results

Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: Maria Santos and David Chang are investigative journalists whose work involves uncovering hidden institutional wrongdoing through careful research.

Argument Flow: The passage introduces two investigative journalists, describes their relationship to institutional secrecy (blank to be filled), then explains how their systematic research methods reveal corruption and misconduct that institutions try to hide.


Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.


Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The second sentence tells us these journalists use 'meticulous research and source verification' that 'systematically reveals corruption and misconduct that corporate and government entities attempt to conceal.' So these journalists are actively uncovering hidden wrongdoing.
  • The relationship between the journalists and 'institutional secrecy' should reflect this active work of uncovering hidden information. Since they reveal things that institutions try to conceal, they are working against secrecy - bringing hidden things into the light.
  • So the right answer should describe an action that involves revealing, uncovering, or bringing to light what institutions want to keep hidden.
Answer Choices Explained
A

exposing

✓ Correct

  • 'Exposing' means bringing hidden information into the open.
  • This perfectly matches how their research 'reveals corruption and misconduct that corporate and government entities attempt to conceal'.
  • Creates the logical flow: journalists expose secrets, their research reveals hidden corruption.
B

preventing

✗ Incorrect

  • 'Preventing' means stopping something from happening.
  • This does not fit because the passage shows they are actively investigating and revealing information, not trying to stop institutional secrecy from existing.
C

ignoring

✗ Incorrect

  • 'Ignoring' means paying no attention to something.
  • This directly contradicts the evidence that they do 'meticulous research' specifically focused on uncovering hidden institutional wrongdoing.
D

anticipating

✗ Incorrect

  • 'Anticipating' means expecting or predicting something.
  • This does not match the active, investigative work described - they are not just predicting secrecy, they are actively uncovering specific hidden corruption.
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.