prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen has made significant contributions to our understanding of coral reef ecosystems. While researching the effects...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen has made significant contributions to our understanding of coral reef ecosystems. While researching the effects of ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef _____ Chen developed a new method for measuring pH levels in real-time. This technique has since been adopted by research institutions worldwide.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

(2021), and

B

(2021) and

C

(2021)

D

(2021),

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen
  • has made significant contributions
  • to our understanding
  • of coral reef ecosystems.
  • While researching the effects of ocean acidification
  • in the Great Barrier Reef (2021) [?] Chen
  • developed a new method
  • for measuring pH levels in real-time.
  • This technique
  • has since been adopted
  • by research institutions worldwide.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start reading to understand what this is telling us.

The first sentence introduces our subject:

  • Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen has made significant contributions to understanding coral reef ecosystems.

Now the second sentence gives us a specific example of her work:

  • "While researching the effects of ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef (2021)..."

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at our choices:

  • Choice A: (2021), and
  • Choice B: (2021) and
  • Choice C: (2021)
  • Choice D: (2021),

So we're deciding what punctuation (if any) should come after "(2021)".

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

The sentence continues: "Chen developed a new method for measuring pH levels in real-time."

Now let's really understand the structure here:

  • "While researching the effects of ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef (2021)"
    • This opening part is giving us context or background information
    • It's setting up the circumstances under which something happened
    • Notice it starts with "While" – this makes it depend on what comes next
    • It can't stand alone as a complete thought
  • "Chen developed a new method for measuring pH levels in real-time"
    • This is the main statement
    • It tells us what actually happened: Chen developed a new method
    • This CAN stand alone as a complete thought
    • Subject: Chen
    • Action: developed a new method

What do we notice about this structure?

  • We have an opening part that sets the scene (starting with "While")
    • followed by the main statement of what happened
  • This opening part is providing background for the main action
  • When a sentence starts with this kind of background clause (beginning with words like "while," "although," "because," etc.),
    • we need to separate it from the main statement with a comma
  • We need JUST A COMMA – not "and"
    • "And" would be used to connect two complete, equal statements
    • But our opening part isn't a complete statement on its own
    • It's dependent background information, not an equal partner

So we need just a comma after "(2021)" to separate the background information from the main statement.

The correct answer is D: (2021),


Grammar Concept Applied

Using Commas After Introductory Background Clauses

When a sentence begins with background information or context introduced by words like "while," "although," "because," "when," or "if" (called subordinating conjunctions in grammar terms), you need to place a comma after that opening part before moving to the main statement:

Pattern:

  • [Background clause starting with while/although/because/etc.], [main statement].

Example 1:

  • With comma (correct): While studying marine life in 2021, Chen made an important discovery.
  • Background: "While studying marine life in 2021"
  • Main statement: "Chen made an important discovery"
  • The comma separates the two parts

Example 2:

  • With comma (correct): Although the research was challenging, the team completed it successfully.
  • Background: "Although the research was challenging"
  • Main statement: "the team completed it successfully"

In our question:

  • Background clause: "While researching the effects of ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef (2021)"
  • Main statement: "Chen developed a new method for measuring pH levels in real-time"
  • We need the comma after "(2021)" to properly separate these two parts

Important distinction: We use JUST a comma here, not ", and" because:

  • "And" is used to connect two complete, independent statements that are equal partners
  • But our opening part starting with "While" is dependent background information, not an independent statement
  • It needs the main statement to complete its meaning
Answer Choices Explained
A

(2021), and

✗ Incorrect

  • Adding "and" after the comma suggests we're connecting two equal, complete statements
  • But "While researching the effects of ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef" is NOT a complete statement – it's dependent background information
  • "And" is used to join equal elements, not to connect background information to a main statement
  • This creates a structural error
B

(2021) and

✗ Incorrect

  • The same fundamental problem as Choice A – "and" doesn't work here
  • The opening "While..." part isn't a complete statement, so we can't use "and" to connect it to the main clause
  • Additionally, even if "and" were appropriate, you'd typically need a comma before it when connecting lengthy clauses
  • This creates incorrect structure
C

(2021)

✗ Incorrect

  • Without any punctuation, the sentence runs together incorrectly
  • When you start a sentence with background information like this (introduced by "while," "although," etc.), you need to mark where that background part ends and the main statement begins
  • Without the comma, it reads awkwardly: "...Great Barrier Reef (2021) Chen developed..."
  • This creates a run-on effect and violates the comma rule for introductory clauses
D

(2021),

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.