prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen spent three years observing coral reef ecosystems in the Caribbean. Her detailed field notes about...

GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions

Source: Prism
Craft and Structure
Words in Context
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen spent three years observing coral reef ecosystems in the Caribbean. Her detailed field notes about symbiotic relationships between different species eventually _____ her groundbreaking research methodology. For instance, Chen developed her innovative multi-species tracking system after noticing how certain fish species consistently followed predictable patterns around coral formations.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?

A

shaped

B

complicated

C

delayed

D

contradicted

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Marine biologist Dr. Sarah Chen spent three years observing coral reef ecosystems in the Caribbean."
  • What it says: Chen = marine biologist, 3 yrs studying Caribbean reefs
  • What it does: Introduces the researcher and her long-term fieldwork
  • What it is: Background context
"Her detailed field notes about symbiotic relationships between different species eventually ______ her groundbreaking research methodology."
  • What it is: Missing logical connector
"For instance, Chen developed her innovative multi-species tracking system after noticing how certain fish species consistently followed predictable patterns around coral formations."
  • What it says: Chen created new tracking system from fish behavior patterns
  • What it does: Provides specific example of how observations led to methodological innovation
  • What it is: Supporting example

Part B: Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Visual Structure Map: [RESEARCHER BACKGROUND] Chen's 3-year Caribbean reef study → [MAIN RELATIONSHIP] Field notes [MISSING CONNECTOR] research methodology → [CONCRETE EXAMPLE] Fish patterns → New tracking system

Main Point: Dr. Chen's detailed field observations influenced the development of her innovative research methods.

Argument Flow: The passage establishes Chen as a dedicated researcher, then indicates her field notes had some important relationship to her methodology, and finally provides a concrete example showing how her observations directly led to methodological innovations.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • Looking at our passage analysis, we need a word that describes what Chen's field notes did to her research methodology
  • The key evidence comes from the example: Chen developed her tracking system "after noticing" fish patterns
  • This shows her observations directly influenced and formed her methods
  • The relationship we need is: detailed observations → influenced/formed → innovative methodology
  • So the right answer should indicate that her field notes influenced, formed, or guided the development of her research methodology
Answer Choices Explained
A

shaped

✓ Correct

  • "Shaped" means influenced the development or form of something
  • This perfectly captures how Chen's detailed observations influenced and formed her research methodology
  • Matches our prethinking that her notes guided the development of her methods
B

complicated

✗ Incorrect

  • Would suggest her notes made her methodology more difficult or complex
  • Contradicts the positive tone and the example showing productive innovation
  • What trap this represents: Students might think detailed notes naturally make research more complicated, but the passage shows the opposite - they led to breakthrough innovations
C

delayed

✗ Incorrect

  • Would suggest her notes postponed or held back her methodology development
  • Contradicts the word "eventually" which implies progression, not obstruction
  • The example shows notes leading to innovation, not delays
D

contradicted

✗ Incorrect

  • Would suggest her notes went against or opposed her methodology
  • Makes no logical sense - why would a researcher's own observations contradict their methods?
  • The example clearly shows notes supporting methodological development
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.