prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Marine biologist Sylvia Earle has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades. Her groundbreaking work in the 1970s included leading the first...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Marine biologist Sylvia Earle has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades. Her groundbreaking work in the 1970s included leading the first team of female aquanauts. Many of the _____ of underwater ecosystems have become foundational texts in oceanography.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

scientists detailed study's

B

scientist's detailed studies

C

scientist's detailed study's

D

scientists detailed studies

Solution

Sentence Structure

  • Marine biologist Sylvia Earle
    • has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades.
  • Her groundbreaking work in the 1970s
    • included leading the first team of female aquanauts.
  • Many of the (?) of underwater ecosystems
    • have become foundational texts in oceanography.
  • Where (?): scientist's/scientists + detailed + study's/studies

Understanding the Meaning

The passage introduces us to Sylvia Earle:

  • A marine biologist who has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades
  • Her work in the 1970s included leading the first team of female aquanauts

Now we get to the sentence with the blank:

  • "Many of the _____ of underwater ecosystems have become foundational texts in oceanography."

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • A. scientists detailed study's
  • B. scientist's detailed studies
  • C. scientist's detailed study's
  • D. scientists detailed studies

To see what works here, let's read and really understand what this sentence is telling us!

The sentence is saying that:

  • "Many" of something have become foundational texts (plural books/papers)
  • These are texts "in oceanography" - the field of ocean science

What are these "many" things?

Let's think about the structure: "Many of the _____ of underwater ecosystems"

Breaking this down:

  • We need something that can be "many" (plural)
  • These things are "of underwater ecosystems" (about underwater ecosystems)
  • They belong to someone (the scientist - Earle, from context)

What do we notice about what we need here?

  • First, "many" tells us we need a plural noun at the end
    • "studies" works with "many" ✓
    • "study's" (singular possessive) cannot work with "many" ✗
  • Second, we need to show possession - whose studies?
    • The scientist's studies (belonging to the scientist - Earle)
    • So we need "scientist's" (with apostrophe + s showing possession)
  • Third, "detailed" is the adjective describing what kind of studies

So the complete phrase should be:

  • "the scientist's detailed studies"
    • = the detailed studies belonging to the scientist (Earle)

The complete meaning:

  • Many of Earle's detailed studies of underwater ecosystems have become foundational texts in the field of oceanography.

The correct answer is Choice B: scientist's detailed studies


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using Possessive Apostrophes with Singular Nouns

When you want to show that something belongs to a singular person or thing, you add apostrophe + s to the noun. Then the noun that follows must match any quantity words in the sentence.

Pattern:

  • Singular possessive: scientist + 's = scientist's (the scientist's work, the scientist's studies)
  • This shows ownership: the studies belonging to the scientist

Key principle: Match the final noun to quantity words

  • "Many of the scientist's studies" ✓ (many requires plural "studies")
  • "Many of the scientist's study's" ✗ (study's is singular possessive - can't work with "many")

In this question:

  • We need: "the scientist's detailed studies"
  • "scientist's" = possessive showing the studies belong to the scientist (Earle)
  • "studies" = plural noun matching "many"
  • "detailed" = adjective describing the studies

Common mistake to avoid:

  • Don't confuse plural (scientists) with possessive (scientist's)
  • "scientists studies" = unclear (just plural, no possession shown)
  • "scientist's studies" = clear (shows ownership + plural)
Answer Choices Explained
A

scientists detailed study's

✗ Incorrect

  • "scientists" without an apostrophe is just plural, not possessive - it doesn't show that the studies belong to anyone
  • "study's" is singular possessive, which cannot work with "many" - you can't say "many of the study's"
  • This creates grammatical confusion
B

scientist's detailed studies

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

C

scientist's detailed study's

✗ Incorrect

  • "scientist's" is correct (showing possession)
  • But "study's" is singular possessive, which doesn't work with "many"
  • You cannot say "many of the study's" - that's grammatically incorrect
D

scientists detailed studies

✗ Incorrect

  • "scientists" is plural but not possessive (no apostrophe)
  • Without the apostrophe, this doesn't show ownership - we don't know whose studies these are
  • The phrase "scientists detailed studies" is ambiguous and grammatically incomplete
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.