Marine biologist Sylvia Earle has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades. Her groundbreaking work in the 1970s included leading the first...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Marine biologist Sylvia Earle has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades. Her groundbreaking work in the 1970s included leading the first team of female aquanauts. Many of the _____ of underwater ecosystems have become foundational texts in oceanography.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
scientists detailed study's
scientist's detailed studies
scientist's detailed study's
scientists detailed studies
Sentence Structure
- Marine biologist Sylvia Earle
- has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades.
- Her groundbreaking work in the 1970s
- included leading the first team of female aquanauts.
- Many of the (?) of underwater ecosystems
- have become foundational texts in oceanography.
- Where (?): scientist's/scientists + detailed + study's/studies
Understanding the Meaning
The passage introduces us to Sylvia Earle:
- A marine biologist who has pioneered deep-sea exploration for decades
- Her work in the 1970s included leading the first team of female aquanauts
Now we get to the sentence with the blank:
- "Many of the _____ of underwater ecosystems have become foundational texts in oceanography."
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- A. scientists detailed study's
- B. scientist's detailed studies
- C. scientist's detailed study's
- D. scientists detailed studies
To see what works here, let's read and really understand what this sentence is telling us!
The sentence is saying that:
- "Many" of something have become foundational texts (plural books/papers)
- These are texts "in oceanography" - the field of ocean science
What are these "many" things?
Let's think about the structure: "Many of the _____ of underwater ecosystems"
Breaking this down:
- We need something that can be "many" (plural)
- These things are "of underwater ecosystems" (about underwater ecosystems)
- They belong to someone (the scientist - Earle, from context)
What do we notice about what we need here?
- First, "many" tells us we need a plural noun at the end
- "studies" works with "many" ✓
- "study's" (singular possessive) cannot work with "many" ✗
- Second, we need to show possession - whose studies?
- The scientist's studies (belonging to the scientist - Earle)
- So we need "scientist's" (with apostrophe + s showing possession)
- Third, "detailed" is the adjective describing what kind of studies
So the complete phrase should be:
- "the scientist's detailed studies"
- = the detailed studies belonging to the scientist (Earle)
The complete meaning:
- Many of Earle's detailed studies of underwater ecosystems have become foundational texts in the field of oceanography.
The correct answer is Choice B: scientist's detailed studies
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Possessive Apostrophes with Singular Nouns
When you want to show that something belongs to a singular person or thing, you add apostrophe + s to the noun. Then the noun that follows must match any quantity words in the sentence.
Pattern:
- Singular possessive: scientist + 's = scientist's (the scientist's work, the scientist's studies)
- This shows ownership: the studies belonging to the scientist
Key principle: Match the final noun to quantity words
- "Many of the scientist's studies" ✓ (many requires plural "studies")
- "Many of the scientist's study's" ✗ (study's is singular possessive - can't work with "many")
In this question:
- We need: "the scientist's detailed studies"
- "scientist's" = possessive showing the studies belong to the scientist (Earle)
- "studies" = plural noun matching "many"
- "detailed" = adjective describing the studies
Common mistake to avoid:
- Don't confuse plural (scientists) with possessive (scientist's)
- "scientists studies" = unclear (just plural, no possession shown)
- "scientist's studies" = clear (shows ownership + plural)
scientists detailed study's
✗ Incorrect
- "scientists" without an apostrophe is just plural, not possessive - it doesn't show that the studies belong to anyone
- "study's" is singular possessive, which cannot work with "many" - you can't say "many of the study's"
- This creates grammatical confusion
scientist's detailed studies
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
scientist's detailed study's
✗ Incorrect
- "scientist's" is correct (showing possession)
- But "study's" is singular possessive, which doesn't work with "many"
- You cannot say "many of the study's" - that's grammatically incorrect
scientists detailed studies
✗ Incorrect
- "scientists" is plural but not possessive (no apostrophe)
- Without the apostrophe, this doesn't show ownership - we don't know whose studies these are
- The phrase "scientists detailed studies" is ambiguous and grammatically incomplete