Marine biologists studying the effects of ocean warming have discovered that while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Marine biologists studying the effects of ocean warming have discovered that while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature _____ the majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching when water temperatures rise beyond historical norms.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
changes:
changes;
changes,
changes
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Marine biologists
- studying the effects of ocean warming
- have discovered that
- while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience
- to temperature changes [?]
- the majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching
- when water temperatures rise beyond historical norms.
- while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience
Where [?] is:
- A: colon (:)
- B: semicolon (;)
- C: comma (,)
- D: nothing
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
'Marine biologists studying the effects of ocean warming have discovered that...'
So we're learning about a discovery that marine biologists made. What did they discover?
'...while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature changes...'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- We're deciding what punctuation (if any) should come after 'changes'
- The options are: colon, semicolon, comma, or nothing
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
'...the majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching when water temperatures rise beyond historical norms.'
Now let's understand the complete picture of what the biologists discovered:
- 'While some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature changes'
- This tells us one fact: some corals handle the warming surprisingly well
- 'The majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching when water temperatures rise beyond historical norms'
- This tells us a contrasting fact: most reef-building corals don't handle it well - they bleach
So the discovery has two parts that contrast with each other:
- Some corals are resilient (the surprising part)
- BUT most reef-building corals suffer bleaching (the concerning part)
What do we notice about the structure here?
- The word 'while' at the start of the first part is key
- 'While' introduces a subordinate thought - it's setting up background information or a contrast
- This 'while' part can't stand alone as a complete sentence
- The second part 'the majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching...'
- This IS a complete thought with its own subject and verb
- This is the main statement
- When you have a subordinate part (starting with 'while') that comes BEFORE the main statement, you need a comma to separate them
- The comma shows the reader: "Here's where the introductory/background information ends and the main point begins"
The correct answer is C: changes, (with comma).
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Commas After Introductory Subordinate Clauses
When a subordinate clause (also called a dependent clause in grammar terms) comes at the beginning of a sentence, you need a comma to separate it from the main clause. Subordinate clauses often start with words like "while," "although," "because," "when," "if," "since," or "as."
The Pattern:
- Subordinate clause (starts with subordinating word), main clause.
- Example: "While I enjoy summer, I prefer autumn."
- "While I enjoy summer" = subordinate clause (can't stand alone)
- "I prefer autumn" = main clause (complete thought)
- Comma separates them
Why the comma is needed:
- The comma acts as a signal to readers: "The introductory/background information is ending, and now the main point is starting"
- Without it, the sentence feels rushed and confusing
In our question:
- Subordinate clause: "while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature changes"
- Starts with "while"
- Provides contrasting background information
- Cannot stand alone
- Main clause: "the majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching when water temperatures rise beyond historical norms"
- Complete thought
- The primary statement being made
- Result: changes, the majority (comma needed)
Quick check: If you can move the subordinate clause to the end of the sentence without the comma, it confirms it's a subordinate clause:
- "The majority of reef-building corals show significant bleaching while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience" (no comma needed when subordinate clause comes second)
changes:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce something that explains or elaborates on what came before
- But the "while" part and the "majority of corals" part aren't in an introduction-explanation relationship
- They're two contrasting facts being presented together as the discovery
- The colon creates an incorrect relationship between these parts
changes;
✗ Incorrect
- A semicolon connects two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as full sentences
- But "while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature changes" cannot stand alone
- The word "while" makes it a subordinate/dependent clause - it needs to connect to a main clause
- Using a semicolon here is grammatically incorrect
changes,
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
changes
✗ Incorrect
- Without punctuation, the sentence becomes: "while some coral species demonstrate unexpected resilience to temperature changes the majority of reef-building corals show..."
- This creates a run-on where two clauses are jammed together
- Readers can't tell where one thought ends and the next begins
- Standard English requires punctuation to separate an introductory subordinate clause from the main clause