Mycelial networks, the underground fungal structures connecting plant roots, facilitate communication between trees through chemical ______ researcher...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Mycelial networks, the underground fungal structures connecting plant roots, facilitate communication between trees through chemical ______ researchers have documented these networks spanning hundreds of acres and linking entire forest ecosystems.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
signals
signals;
signals,
signals, which
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Mycelial networks,
- the underground fungal structures connecting plant roots,
- facilitate communication between trees
- through chemical signals [?]
- researchers have documented these networks spanning hundreds of acres
- and linking entire forest ecosystems.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning:
The sentence opens with 'Mycelial networks' – and immediately gives us more detail about what these are:
- 'the underground fungal structures connecting plant roots'
Then we learn what these networks do:
- 'facilitate communication between trees through chemical signals'
So the first part is telling us: these underground fungal networks help trees communicate with each other through chemical signals.
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- Choice A: no punctuation after 'signals'
- Choice B: semicolon after 'signals'
- Choice C: comma after 'signals'
- Choice D: comma + 'which' instead of just 'researchers'
To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what it's saying!
The second part tells us:
- 'researchers have documented these networks spanning hundreds of acres and linking entire forest ecosystems'
This is adding another piece of information – researchers have studied and recorded evidence of how vast these networks are (hundreds of acres) and how they connect entire forest systems.
Now, what do we notice about the structure here?
- The first part: 'Mycelial networks...facilitate communication between trees through chemical signals'
- This is a complete thought
- It has a subject (Mycelial networks) and a main verb (facilitate)
- This could stand alone as its own sentence
- The second part: 'researchers have documented these networks spanning hundreds of acres...'
- This is ALSO a complete thought
- It has its own subject (researchers) and verb (have documented)
- This could also stand alone as its own sentence
So we have two complete thoughts that are closely related in meaning (both about mycelial networks) but are grammatically independent of each other.
When we have two complete thoughts like this, we can't just run them together with no punctuation or with only a comma – we need stronger punctuation to properly connect them.
The correct answer is B: signals; (semicolon)
A semicolon is used to connect two complete thoughts that are closely related. It shows the reader: "These are two separate complete ideas, but they're connected in meaning, so I'm keeping them in one sentence."
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Connecting Two Complete Thoughts
When you have two complete thoughts (called independent clauses in grammar terms) that could each stand alone as sentences, you need proper punctuation to connect them. You have three options:
Option 1: Semicolon
- Use when the thoughts are closely related
- Shows connection while maintaining separation
- Example from our question:
- First complete thought: "Mycelial networks...facilitate communication between trees through chemical signals"
- Second complete thought: "researchers have documented these networks spanning hundreds of acres..."
- Connection: semicolon (because both are about mycelial networks)
Option 2: Period
- Use to separate them into two distinct sentences
- "These networks facilitate communication. Researchers have documented them."
Option 3: Comma + Coordinating Conjunction
- Use comma plus words like "and," "but," "or," "so"
- "These networks facilitate communication, and researchers have documented them."
What you CANNOT do:
- No punctuation = run-on sentence
- Comma alone = comma splice
In our question, the semicolon (Choice B) properly connects two related but complete thoughts, showing they're part of one cohesive statement about mycelial networks.
signals
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a run-on sentence by jamming two complete thoughts together with no punctuation
- The reader would hit "signals researchers" and be confused because two independent statements are incorrectly merged
- This violates the fundamental rule that complete thoughts need proper punctuation between them
signals;
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
signals,
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a comma splice – using just a comma to connect two complete sentences
- While a comma provides some pause, it's not strong enough punctuation to properly join two independent clauses
- This is a classic punctuation error on the SAT
signals, which
✗ Incorrect
- The word "which" would need to introduce a descriptive clause about whatever noun comes right before it
- Here, "which researchers have documented..." doesn't logically describe "chemical signals"
- The second part is making a separate statement about what researchers have done, not describing the signals themselves
- This creates an illogical and grammatically incorrect structure