Occupying a significant part of modern-day Nigeria, the Kingdom of Benin was one of the major powers in West Africa...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Occupying a significant part of modern-day Nigeria, the Kingdom of Benin was one of the major powers in West Africa between the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries. It ________ ruled by Oba Ewuare I from 1440 to 1473.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
is
will be
has been
was
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of these sentences. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentences as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
Sentence 1:
- Occupying a significant part of modern-day Nigeria,
- the Kingdom of Benin
- was one of the major powers in West Africa
- between the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries.
- was one of the major powers in West Africa
Sentence 2:
- It [?] ruled by Oba Ewuare I
- from 1440 to 1473.
Understanding the Meaning
The first sentence tells us about the Kingdom of Benin:
- It occupied a significant part of what is now Nigeria.
- It WAS one of the major powers in West Africa.
- This was during a specific time period:
- the 13th through 19th centuries (that's the 1200s through the 1800s).
Now here's where we need to fill in the blank in the second sentence:
- "It ______ ruled by Oba Ewuare I from 1440 to 1473."
Let's look at our choices:
- We're deciding between different verb tenses:
- is, will be, has been, or was.
What do we know from the sentence?
- The time frame is very specific: "from 1440 to 1473"
- These are dates from the past - over 500 years ago!
- The first sentence already established we're talking about
- historical events (13th-19th centuries).
What do we notice about the time markers here?
- "From 1440 to 1473" tells us exactly when this happened.
- These specific dates in the distant past signal
- that this is a completed historical event.
- When something happened at a specific time in the past
- and is completely finished, we need simple past tense.
So we need was.
The sentence is saying: The Kingdom of Benin was ruled by Oba Ewuare I during that specific period from 1440 to 1473.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Matching Verb Tense to Time Markers
When a sentence includes specific time markers - especially dates or time periods - your verb tense must match that time context:
Pattern 1: Specific past dates → Simple past tense
- The kingdom was ruled by Oba Ewuare I from 1440 to 1473.
- Time marker: "from 1440 to 1473" (specific past dates)
- Verb needed: simple past "was"
Pattern 2: Present/current time markers → Present tense
- The museum is open today from 9 AM to 5 PM.
- Time marker: "today" (present)
- Verb needed: present "is"
Pattern 3: Future time markers → Future tense
- The exhibition will be on display next month.
- Time marker: "next month" (future)
- Verb needed: future "will be"
Application to this question:
The dates "from 1440 to 1473" are clear time markers indicating when something happened in the past. This completed historical event requires simple past tense: "was ruled."
is
✗ Incorrect
- Present tense would mean the kingdom IS being ruled by Oba Ewuare I right now, at this moment.
- But the dates given are "from 1440 to 1473" - clearly in the past!
- This creates an impossible time mismatch: the verb says "now" but the dates say "over 500 years ago."
will be
✗ Incorrect
- Future tense would mean the kingdom WILL BE ruled by Oba Ewuare I at some future time.
- But the dates are "from 1440 to 1473" - these are past dates, not future ones.
- You can't use future tense to describe something that already happened centuries ago.
has been
✗ Incorrect
- This tense connects the past to the present - suggesting something that happened before but still has relevance now.
- But this is about a kingdom that existed centuries ago and a ruler who reigned from 1440-1473.
- These are completed historical events with no ongoing connection to the present moment.
- For such clearly distant, finished historical events, simple past tense (was) is correct, not "has been."
was
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.