prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Occupying a significant part of modern-day Nigeria, the Kingdom of Benin was one of the major powers in West Africa...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Official
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Occupying a significant part of modern-day Nigeria, the Kingdom of Benin was one of the major powers in West Africa between the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries. It ________ ruled by Oba Ewuare I from 1440 to 1473.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

is

B

will be

C

has been

D

was

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of these sentences. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentences as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

Sentence 1:

  • Occupying a significant part of modern-day Nigeria,
  • the Kingdom of Benin
    • was one of the major powers in West Africa
      • between the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries.

Sentence 2:

  • It [?] ruled by Oba Ewuare I
    • from 1440 to 1473.

Understanding the Meaning

The first sentence tells us about the Kingdom of Benin:

  • It occupied a significant part of what is now Nigeria.
  • It WAS one of the major powers in West Africa.
  • This was during a specific time period:
    • the 13th through 19th centuries (that's the 1200s through the 1800s).

Now here's where we need to fill in the blank in the second sentence:

  • "It ______ ruled by Oba Ewuare I from 1440 to 1473."

Let's look at our choices:

  • We're deciding between different verb tenses:
    • is, will be, has been, or was.

What do we know from the sentence?

  • The time frame is very specific: "from 1440 to 1473"
  • These are dates from the past - over 500 years ago!
  • The first sentence already established we're talking about
    • historical events (13th-19th centuries).

What do we notice about the time markers here?

  • "From 1440 to 1473" tells us exactly when this happened.
  • These specific dates in the distant past signal
    • that this is a completed historical event.
  • When something happened at a specific time in the past
    • and is completely finished, we need simple past tense.

So we need was.

The sentence is saying: The Kingdom of Benin was ruled by Oba Ewuare I during that specific period from 1440 to 1473.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Matching Verb Tense to Time Markers

When a sentence includes specific time markers - especially dates or time periods - your verb tense must match that time context:

Pattern 1: Specific past dates → Simple past tense

  • The kingdom was ruled by Oba Ewuare I from 1440 to 1473.
  • Time marker: "from 1440 to 1473" (specific past dates)
  • Verb needed: simple past "was"

Pattern 2: Present/current time markers → Present tense

  • The museum is open today from 9 AM to 5 PM.
  • Time marker: "today" (present)
  • Verb needed: present "is"

Pattern 3: Future time markers → Future tense

  • The exhibition will be on display next month.
  • Time marker: "next month" (future)
  • Verb needed: future "will be"

Application to this question:
The dates "from 1440 to 1473" are clear time markers indicating when something happened in the past. This completed historical event requires simple past tense: "was ruled."

Answer Choices Explained
A

is

✗ Incorrect

  • Present tense would mean the kingdom IS being ruled by Oba Ewuare I right now, at this moment.
  • But the dates given are "from 1440 to 1473" - clearly in the past!
  • This creates an impossible time mismatch: the verb says "now" but the dates say "over 500 years ago."
B

will be

✗ Incorrect

  • Future tense would mean the kingdom WILL BE ruled by Oba Ewuare I at some future time.
  • But the dates are "from 1440 to 1473" - these are past dates, not future ones.
  • You can't use future tense to describe something that already happened centuries ago.
C

has been

✗ Incorrect

  • This tense connects the past to the present - suggesting something that happened before but still has relevance now.
  • But this is about a kingdom that existed centuries ago and a ruler who reigned from 1440-1473.
  • These are completed historical events with no ongoing connection to the present moment.
  • For such clearly distant, finished historical events, simple past tense (was) is correct, not "has been."
D

was

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.