prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

On March 3, 1991, Switzerland's government lowered the minimum voting age for its citizens from 20 to 18 years old....

GMAT Expression of Ideas : (Expression) Questions

Source: Official
Expression of Ideas
Transitions
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

On March 3, 1991, Switzerland's government lowered the minimum voting age for its citizens from 20 to 18 years old. _____ many people in Switzerland gained a new opportunity to participate in their country's political process.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?

A

Nevertheless,

B

As a result,

C

By contrast,

D

Similarly,

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"On March 3, 1991, Switzerland's government lowered the minimum voting age for its citizens from 20 to 18 years old."
  • What it says: Swiss government lowered voting age from 20 to 18 in 1991
  • What it does: Introduces a specific government policy change
  • What it is: Context/background action
[MISSING TRANSITION]
  • What it is: Missing logical connector
"many people in Switzerland gained a new opportunity to participate in their country's political process."
  • What it says: More Swiss people gained voting opportunity
  • What it does: Describes the outcome of the policy change
  • What it is: Result/consequence

Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: Switzerland's decision to lower the voting age expanded political participation opportunities for its citizens.

Argument Flow: The passage presents a straightforward cause-and-effect sequence. First, we learn about a specific government action (lowering the voting age), and then we see what happened as a direct result of that action (more people gained voting opportunities).

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • From our analysis, we can see that the first sentence describes a government action (lowering the voting age), and the second sentence describes what happened because of that action (more people got voting opportunities)
  • We need a transition that shows this cause-and-effect relationship
  • The right answer should signal that the second sentence is a direct consequence or result of the first sentence
  • It should connect the government's policy change to the outcome for Swiss citizens
Answer Choices Explained
A

Nevertheless,

Nevertheless,
✗ Incorrect

  • "Nevertheless" signals contrast or opposition
  • This would suggest the expanded voting opportunities happened despite the age change, not because of it
B

As a result,

As a result,
✓ Correct

  • This phrase directly signals cause and effect
  • It perfectly connects the government action (lowering voting age) to its consequence (more people can vote)
  • Matches our prethinking exactly - we need a connector showing that the second sentence flows logically from the first
C

By contrast,

By contrast,
✗ Incorrect

  • "By contrast" signals comparison or difference
  • This would suggest the expanded voting opportunities are different from or opposite to the age change
  • Makes no logical sense since both sentences are about the same policy and its effects
D

Similarly,

Similarly,
✗ Incorrect

  • "Similarly" suggests likeness or comparison to something else
  • There's nothing in the first sentence for the second sentence to be "similar" to
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.