prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Overgrazing by purple sea urchins has caused many kelp forests along North America's west coast to be replaced by urchin...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Information and Ideas
Inferences
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Overgrazing by purple sea urchins has caused many kelp forests along North America's west coast to be replaced by urchin barrens—areas stripped of vegetation and covered in purple sea urchins. Urchins in barrens persist in a state of starvation that lessens their nutritional value—and thus their appeal—to many predators. Sarah Gravem and colleagues placed sunflower sea stars, a once-abundant predator species suffering massive population declines in recent years, in aquariums that each contained a nutritionally poor and a nutritionally rich purple sea urchin. The researchers found that the sea stars selected the nutritionally rich urchin in \(42.7\%\) of trials and the nutritionally poor urchin in \(37.5\%\) of trials, suggesting that ______

Which choice most logically completes the text?

A

sunflower sea stars are willing to hunt sea urchins, but if given a choice, they will prey on other more nutritious marine animals instead.

B

sunflower sea stars are reluctant to feed on both nutritionally poor and nutritionally rich sea urchins and are therefore unlikely to thrive in kelp forests.

C

sunflower sea stars are less likely to consume sea urchins in barrens than other species of sea stars are, putting sunflower sea stars at a high risk of extinction.

D

sunflower sea stars do not always avoid foraging on nutritionally poor sea urchins, making sunflower sea star population recovery a potentially important tool for controlling urchin barrens.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
Overgrazing by purple sea urchins has caused many kelp forests along North America's west coast to be replaced by urchin barrens—areas stripped of vegetation and covered in purple sea urchins.
  • What it says: Purple urchins destroyed kelp forests creating urchin barrens.
  • What it does: Introduces the environmental problem.
  • What it is: Context/background
Urchins in barrens persist in a state of starvation that lessens their nutritional value—and thus their appeal—to many predators.
  • What it says: Starving urchins have low nutrition and less predator appeal.
  • What it does: Explains why the problem persists.
  • What it is: Mechanism/explanation
Sarah Gravem and colleagues placed sunflower sea stars, a once-abundant predator species suffering massive population declines in recent years, in aquariums that each contained a nutritionally poor and a nutritionally rich purple sea urchin.
  • What it says: Researchers tested sunflower stars with poor vs rich urchins.
  • What it does: Presents experimental setup.
  • What it is: Method/study design
The researchers found that the sea stars selected the nutritionally rich urchin in 42.7% of trials and the nutritionally poor urchin in 37.5% of trials
  • What it says: Rich urchin selected \(\mathrm{42.7\%}\), poor urchin \(\mathrm{37.5\%}\).
  • What it does: Provides key data.
  • What it is: Results/evidence

Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: An experiment tested whether sunflower sea stars show strong preference for nutritionally rich over poor sea urchins, finding a modest difference in selection rates.

Argument Flow: The passage sets up an environmental problem, explains why it persists, then presents experimental data about predator behavior.


Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.


Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The key insight is that sunflower sea stars chose the nutritionally rich urchin only slightly more often (\(\mathrm{42.7\%}\) vs \(\mathrm{37.5\%}\) - just a \(\mathrm{5.2}\) percentage point difference)
  • This shows these predators don't strongly avoid nutritionally poor urchins
  • They still eat them over one-third of the time, which has implications for controlling urchin populations
Answer Choices Explained
A

sunflower sea stars are willing to hunt sea urchins, but if given a choice, they will prey on other more nutritious marine animals instead.

✗ Incorrect

  • Claims sea stars prefer other marine animals instead
  • The experiment only tested urchin choices - no data about other animals
  • Goes beyond study scope
B

sunflower sea stars are reluctant to feed on both nutritionally poor and nutritionally rich sea urchins and are therefore unlikely to thrive in kelp forests.

✗ Incorrect

  • Says sea stars are reluctant to feed on both types
  • The data shows active selection (\(80.2\%\) combined selection rate)
  • Misinterprets evidence
C

sunflower sea stars are less likely to consume sea urchins in barrens than other species of sea stars are, putting sunflower sea stars at a high risk of extinction.

✗ Incorrect

  • Compares to other sea star species
  • Study only examined sunflower sea stars
  • Introduces absent information
D

sunflower sea stars do not always avoid foraging on nutritionally poor sea urchins, making sunflower sea star population recovery a potentially important tool for controlling urchin barrens.

✓ Correct

  • Correctly states sea stars do not always avoid nutritionally poor urchins (\(37.5\%\) selection proves this) and connects to population recovery as a tool for controlling barrens
  • Matches evidence and broader context
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.