Paintings by the renowned twentieth-century US _____ were featured in Artist to Artist, an exhibition at the Smithsonian Art Museum...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Paintings by the renowned twentieth-century US _____ were featured in Artist to Artist, an exhibition at the Smithsonian Art Museum that paired the works of artists whose career trajectories intersected in meaningful ways.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
artists: Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock,
artists Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock
artists Thomas Hart Benton, and Jackson Pollock,
artists, Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Paintings by the renowned twentieth-century US artists [?]
- were featured in Artist to Artist,
- an exhibition at the Smithsonian Art Museum
- that paired the works of artists
- whose career trajectories intersected in meaningful ways.
- that paired the works of artists
- an exhibition at the Smithsonian Art Museum
Understanding the Meaning
The sentence starts by telling us what was featured in something:
- 'Paintings by the renowned twentieth-century US...'
Now here's where we need to fill in the blank. The sentence is identifying whose paintings these are - paintings by which artists?
Let's look at our choices:
- All choices include 'artists Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock'
- What varies is the punctuation around these names:
- A: colon before, comma after
- B: no punctuation
- C: comma before 'and,' comma after
- D: comma before the names
The key question is: what's the relationship between 'artists' and these two names?
- These names are telling us WHICH artists we're talking about
- They're not giving us extra, optional information about artists in general
- They're specifying the exact two artists whose paintings were featured
Think of it like this:
- 'My friend Sarah' - Sarah tells us which friend (essential information, no commas)
- 'My only friend, Sarah' - Sarah adds a detail about a friend already identified (additional information, use commas)
Here, 'Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock' are essential - they identify which specific artists. Without them, the sentence would mean something different (paintings by US artists in general, not these two particular ones).
What do we notice about the structure here?
- When names or identifiers are ESSENTIAL to specify what we're talking about, they integrate directly with the noun
- No punctuation separates them
- The names flow right after 'artists' because they're answering the question 'which artists?'
So we need: 'artists Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock' with no punctuation.
The correct answer is B.
Now let's read the rest to see the complete picture:
- 'were featured in Artist to Artist'
- This is the main action - these paintings were featured/displayed
- 'an exhibition at the Smithsonian Art Museum'
- This tells us what 'Artist to Artist' was - an exhibition at this museum
- 'that paired the works of artists whose career trajectories intersected in meaningful ways'
- This describes the nature of the exhibition - it paired artists whose careers connected in important ways
- Makes sense! Benton was actually Pollock's teacher, so their careers definitely intersected
The complete meaning: Paintings by these two specific twentieth-century US artists (Benton and Pollock) were featured in an exhibition that paired artists whose careers connected in meaningful ways.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Commas with Essential vs. Additional Information
When a noun is followed by identifying information, whether to use commas depends on whether that information is essential or additional:
Essential Information (Restrictive) - NO COMMAS:
- The information specifies WHICH thing/person you're talking about
- It cannot be removed without changing the core meaning
- It integrates directly with the noun
Examples:
- 'The artist Pablo Picasso revolutionized modern art'
- 'Pablo Picasso' specifies which artist (essential)
- No commas separate the name from 'artist'
- 'Students who study regularly perform better'
- 'who study regularly' specifies which students (not all students)
- No commas around this identifying phrase
Additional Information (Non-restrictive) - USE COMMAS:
- The information adds extra details about something already identified
- It could be removed without changing the core meaning
- It's set off with commas (or dashes/parentheses)
Examples:
- 'My grandmother, Maria, taught me to cook'
- I have one grandmother; 'Maria' adds her name but doesn't identify which one
- Commas set off the additional information
- 'The Mona Lisa, which hangs in the Louvre, is priceless'
- We already know which painting; the location is extra information
- Commas set off this additional detail
In this question:
- 'US artists Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock'
- The names are essential - they specify WHICH artists
- Therefore: no commas (Choice B is correct)
This grammatical relationship (called restrictive vs. non-restrictive modification in grammar terms) is crucial for comma usage in complex sentences!
artists: Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock,
✗ Incorrect
- The colon after 'artists' is incorrect because colons introduce lists or explanations that are set apart from the main sentence flow
- Here, the names are integrated into the sentence structure as part of the subject (the paintings are BY these artists)
- The comma after 'Pollock' incorrectly separates the complete subject ('Paintings by... Pollock') from its verb ('were featured')
artists Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
artists Thomas Hart Benton, and Jackson Pollock,
✗ Incorrect
- The comma before 'and' is incorrect - when you have only TWO items, you don't use a comma before 'and' (only with three or more items)
- The comma after 'Pollock' incorrectly separates the subject from the verb 'were featured'
artists, Thomas Hart Benton and Jackson Pollock
✗ Incorrect
- The comma after 'artists' treats the names as non-essential, additional information - as if they could be removed
- But removing the names would change the meaning: 'Paintings by the renowned twentieth-century US artists were featured' suggests paintings by US artists in general, not these two specific ones
- The names are essential identifiers that specify WHICH artists, so they shouldn't be set off with commas